Dr. Michael Brown in his 2015 book “Out Lasting the Gay Revolution: Where Homosexuality is Really Going and How To Turn The Tide” under principle #6 (page141-170), addresses in dept an important principle for countering the “gay” revolution that I have been endeavoring to follow even before I read his book. The title of that principle #6 is “KEEP PROPAGATING THE TRUTH UNTIL THE LIES ARE DISPELLED”. That is what we dedicated and true Christians must endeavor to do if we are going to break the strangle hold that the homosexual community seems to have on our society.
In this report I am going to examine the primary sources that have been responsible for the phenomenal deception and manipulation of the American public and many so called Christian leaders.
I am indebted Mass Resistance for their published material examining what appears to be a primary source for the modern homosexual agenda and largely responsible for the current acceptance and influence that the homosexual community has today.
I will be drawing mainly from two articles in their “Analysis of The Homosexual Agenda” series-“The Homosexual Propaganda Campaign in America’s media” here after referred to as THPCIAM and “STRATEGIES OF THE HOMOSEXUAL MOVEMENT: "The Overhauling of Straight America", hereafter referred to as SOTHM. I will also be referencing the book “After the Ball” by Harvard graduates Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen who combined psychiatric and public relations expertise in devising their strategy to influence the thinking of the American public, Kirk, a researcher in neuropsychiatry, and Madsen, a public relations consultant.
It is extremely important that you notice how these two intelligent homosexuals used their areas of expertise to influence public opinion, because that practice (using their skills to influence) has been at the center of the homosexual activist’s phenomenal success.
The first sentence of THPCIAM, describes the primary homosexual sources that the article examines with these words:
“The powerful, sophisticated psychological techniques that the homosexual movement has used to manipulate the public in the media”
Those sophisticated psychological techniques were meticulously laid out by homosexuals Marshall Kirk and Erastes Pill in their 1987 article that was published in the homosexual “Guide Magazine” titled: “The Overhauling of Straight America” which was described as the Bible of the homosexual community at that time. It was later expanded into the Book “After the Ball- How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90s”, which was published in 1989 by Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen.
The opening sentence in that THPCIAM article says it all:
“The first order of business is desensitization of the American public concerning gays and gay rights. To desensitize the public is to help it view homosexuality with indifference instead of with keen emotion. Ideally, we would have straights register differences in sexual preference the way they register different tastes for ice cream or sports games: she likes strawberry and I like vanilla; he follows baseball and I follow football. No big deal.”
This makes it clear that any American who now accepts homosexuality when they strongly objected to it years ago, most likely has been successfully programmed to see homosexuality differently, more favorably, by this successful campaign. (And you thought you were just being reasonable and more caring).
You should pay careful attention to how they carefully word their descriptions of those who rejected homosexuality. Notice the words “instead of with keen emotion”. No doubt, you missed their twist, rather than attribute our rejection to homosexuality to intelligent thought; they attribute it to keen “emotions”. That is a condescending remark that shows just how they are taught to think of us or rather how they wanted to convince the public that rejecting homosexuality was not intelligent but emotional. Even in that twist they were conning you.
If you still doubt that you have been conned, try this admission by their masterminds:
“At least in the beginning, we are seeking public desensitization and nothing more. We do not need and cannot expect a full "appreciation" or "understanding" of homosexuality from the average American. You can forget about trying to persuade the masses that homosexuality is a good thing. But if only you can get them to think that it is just another thing, with a shrug of their shoulders, then your battle for legal and social rights is virtually won. And to get to shoulder-shrug stage, gays as a class must cease to appear mysterious, alien, loathsome and contrary. A large-scale media campaign will be required in order to change the image of gays in America.” SOTHM (Emphasis mine).
So there is really no reason for any Christian who accepts homosexuality as a good thing to deny what really happened when they themselves have admitted this to us. They knew that as long as a person saw homosexuality for what it actually was, they would never change their opinion or convictions about it, so their goal was to “desensitize” them. Translated, that really means -programmed to think nothing of the matter by being over exposed to the best kind of images of the homosexual community and avoiding at all cost, any and all true definitive representations of them-. This was a brilliant plan since it was well known in the advertising community and in the media industry, that the thinking and actions of people could be influenced if they were not sufficient critical thinkers and the right tools were used. As stated, that “right tool” was the MEDIA.
And now you should understand why none of their sick behavior at their “PRIDE PARADES” ever seems to make it to the nightly news, only the tame, normal footage is presented to give the impression that the event is a wholesome display of innocent celebration. Our failure to expose this whitewash when it was happening, whenever it happened, helped their cause. If Christians would have used every media means at our disposal to mass publicize what the media was hiding, we would have spoiled their con. But we failed and they won.
You can be sure that if Kirk and Erastes Pill were laying out this strategy in 1987, that it was being talked about and implemented many years earlier. As documented by Dr. Michael Brown is his excellent book, “A Queer Thing Happened to America” pg. 154, this campaign of media take over had already been well under way. There Dr. Brown points out that the Washington Post stated “From TV today [meaning, 1976], the impression given of homosexuals is that they’re just like heterosexuals except they have no hang-ups.”Thus, by 1976 the takeover of media had already been well on it way.
Dr. Brown goes on to site homosexual historian Prof. David Eisenbach:
“One of the great achievements of the gay liberation movement was the display of the nonstereotypical, well-adjusted homosexual on the television in millions of American living rooms. More than any other medium, TV had the power to shape and manipulate the conscious and subconscious prejudices of the American public…By manipulating the media and forcing more sympathetic characterizations of homosexuals on television shows, the gay rights movement offered powerful challenges to common stereotypes.”
Dr. Brown also points out that Professor Eisenbach additionally said there are two primary factors that caused the media transformation. Stating that the first was simply cultural change, specifically a greater acceptance of homosexuality among a younger generation of media executives and screenwriters who matured in a more tolerant, sexually relaxed society. The second was homosexual activism.
While I take issue with the first, as my conviction is that homosexuals actually infiltrated the media and went up the ranks as closet homosexual and made changes in programming that favored their community, I could not agree more with the second. On this point, Dr. Brown gives Professor Eisenbach’s take:
“the more positive presentations of homosexuals were also the achievements of organizations like the Gay Activists Alliance and the National Gay Task Force, which monitored portrayals of homosexuals in media. TV executives discovered they could avoid zaps and bad publicity by having gay activists review scripts that dealt with homosexuality before they were aired. [“Zaps” were protests widely used in the 1970’s.]
This aspect of their tactical strategy to take over the media is not as well publicized as it needs to be. Their harassment tactics via demonstrations at the drop of a hat, which required excellent organization and cooperation as well as instant intercommunication, is arguably their most effective tools, and it no doubt made the many none homosexual network executives think that it would be to their advantage to hire homosexuals on their staff to ensure they were able to stay clear of such protests. And anyone knows that when homosexuals are hired and gain hiring power, they usually hire their closeted homosexual friends. So it should be no surprise that so many homosexuals are in media. And that number is greatly expanded when you take into account the many homosexual make-up artists and fashion experts that have been a part of Hollywood forever. Their control over media and Hollywood and the money they generate may never be recaptured by non-homosexuals, and that massive bankroll is daily being used by them to maintain their control, not only in Media and Hollywood, but in every other important area of mass influence, including government.
SOTHM then went on to list six things that a successful campaign to change the public mind must have to be successful. Please pay careful attention to their meticulous and calculating strategies.
STEP 1: TALK ABOUT GAYS AND GAYNESS AS LOUDLY AND AS OFTEN AS POSSIBLE.
This is what they called their “DESENSITIZATION” tactic. Plaster positive information about homosexuals everywhere so that the public will get so used to seeing and hearing about it that it will no longer be any big deal. Here is how they addressed it.
“The principle behind this advice is simple: almost any behavior begins to look normal if you are exposed to enough of it at close quarters and among your acquaintances. The acceptability of the new behavior will ultimately hinge on the number of one's fellows doing it or accepting it. One may be offended by its novelty at first-- many, in times past, were momentarily scandalized by "streaking,'' eating goldfish, and premarital sex. But as long as Joe Six-pack feels little pressure to perform likewise, and as long as the behavior in question presents little threat to his physical and financial security, he soon gets used to it and life goes on. The skeptic may still shake his head and think "people [are] crazy these days," but over time his objections are likely to become more reflective, more philosophical, less emotional.
The way to benumb raw sensitivities about homosexuality is to have a lot of people talk a great deal about the subject in a neutral or supportive way. Open and frank talk makes the subject seem less furtive, alien, and sinful, more above-board.”
In the Book “After the Ball” Kirk and Madsen further explained under the heading- “DESENSITIZATION”
“Apply this to the problem of homohatred. If gays present themselves-- or allow themselves to be presented--as overwhelmingly different and threatening, they will put straights on a triple-red alert, driving them to overt acts of political oppression or physical violence. If, however, gays can live alongside straights, visibly but as inoffensively as possible, they will arouse a low-grade alert only, which, though annoying to straights, will eventually diminish for purely physiological reasons. Straights will be desensitized. Put more simply, if you go out of your way to be unendurable, people will try to destroy you; otherwise, they might eventually get used to you. This commonsense axiom should make it clear that living down to the stereotype, a la Gender-Bending, is a very bad idea.
We can extract the following principle for our campaign to desensitize straights to gays and gayness, inundate them in a continuous flood of gay-related advertising, presented in the least offensive fashion possible. If straights can't shut off the shower, they may at least eventually get used to being wet.”
So there you have it from their own material, you were set up to accept them and you did not even know it. They played you and you took it, and they did it with craft, deception and manipulation. They out smarted you, and you think you were just being progressive and current and caring.
It is also very important to pay attention to the word “homohatred” and how they unashamedly label all dissenters as homohaters or some other equivalent, regardless of the soundness of their reasons. To homosexual activists, there is no sound reason for objecting to or rejecting homosexuality. Anyone who does not accept or agree with homosexuality must be viewed as a hater. This is discussed in their “step #5” which I will get to later.
Their next tactic listed in SOTHM as stated in “After the Ball” is listed as:
STEP 2: PORTRAY GAYS AS VICTIMS, NOT AS AGGRESSIVE CHALLENGERS.
Again, this is a crafty tactic that worked wonders on getting their ungodly standards accepted. Just read how meticulous they were about tricking people into accepting homosexuality.
“In any campaign to win over the public, gays must be cast as victims in need of protection so that straights will be inclined by reflex to assume the role of protector. If gays are presented, instead, as a strong and prideful tribe promoting a rigidly nonconformist and deviant lifestyle, they are more likely to be seen as a public menace that justifies resistance and oppression. For that reason, we must forego the temptation to strut our "gay pride" publicly when it conflicts with the Gay Victim image. And we must walk the fine line between impressing straights with our great numbers, on the one hand, and sparking their hostile paranoia--"They are all around us!"--on the other.
A media campaign to promote the Gay Victim image should make use of symbols which reduce the mainstream's sense of threat, which lower it's guard, and which enhance the plausibility of victimization. In practical terms, this means that jaunty mustachioed musclemen would keep very low profile in gay commercials and other public presentations, while sympathetic figures of nice young people, old people, and attractive women would be featured. (It almost goes without saying that groups on the farthest margin of acceptability such as NAMBLA, [Ed note -- North American Man-Boy Love Association] must play no part at all in such a campaign: suspected child-molesters will never look like victims.)”
This is just how much they thought of us, we could be manipulated if they only used the right combinations of tactics, even to the point of keeping their fellow man-boy “love” group NAMBLA out of the picture to prevent them from spoiling their con. Absolutely diabolical and amazing, but it gets even worst. They continued:
“Now, there are two different messages about the Gay Victim that are worth communicating. First, the mainstream should be told that gays are victims of fate, in the sense that most never had a choice to accept or reject their sexual preference. The message must read: "As far as gays can tell, they were born gay, just as you were born heterosexual or white or black or bright or athletic. Nobody ever tricked or seduced them; they never made a choice, and are not morally blameworthy. What they do isn't willfully contrary - it's only natural for them. This twist of fate could as easily have happened to you!"”
What calculating nerve, what blatant deception, but oh, what an effective tactic. People fell for it hook, line and sinker without an ounce of any kind of scientific proof from definitive research. It is now well established that there is no “gay gene” that they later claimed existed; nor is there any biological evidence that homosexuality is caused by biological conditions though some still cunningly or ignorantly attempt to incorporate it into their list of causes. While there are still homosexual and pro-homosexual scientists and medical professionals repeating propaganda about the biological causes for homosexuality, many without public or even professional rebuke, the vast majority have conceded that such claims are baseless and many of those who were once convinced that homosexuality was biologically caused have come to grips with the lack of scientific support. That may still change considering the billions of dollars that homosexuals now have through their control of Hollywood, government and corporate industries at their disposal to use in their continued misinformation campaign. With that kind of financial backing, just about any kind of lie can be sustained indefinitely. They continued:
“Straight viewers must be able to identify with gays as victims. Mr. and Mrs. Public must be given no extra excuses to say, "they are not like us." To this end, the persons featured in the public campaign should be decent and upright, appealing and admirable by straight standards, completely unexceptionable in appearance--in a word, they should be indistinguishable from the straights we would like to reach. (To return to the terms we have used in previous articles, spokesmen for our cause must be R-type "straight gays" rather than Q-type "homosexuals on display.") Only under such conditions will the message be read correctly: "These folks are victims of a fate that could have happened to me."
By the way, we realize that many gays will question an advertising technique, which might threaten to make homosexuality look like some dreadful disease, which strikes fated "victims". But the plain fact is that the gay community is weak and must manipulate the powers of the weak, including the play for sympathy. In any case, we compensate for the negative aspect of this gay victim appeal under Principle 4. (Below)”
This is diabolical deception and manipulation to the extreme and they were bold enough to put
this all is a book that could be read by anyone. Because we failed to stop it, this level of audacity will come back to haunt us all as they gain sufficient power. You will see deviance like you never thought possible in all aspects of society. The spirits that drive many of these people are not interested in morality, God or human benefit. They are lust driven, and delight in rebelling against God. That kind of mind and heart is capable of horrible acts of violence. And that is what will result if the public does not wakes up and starts thinking intelligently about homosexuality. Homosexual activists have been saying for years that they will not go back in the closet and some have made serious threats of all out war before they accept losing the ground they have gained by trickery and deception. But that is a topic for another day.
Notice their next tactic:
STEP 3: GIVE PROTECTORS A JUST CAUSE.
This step is so crafty that I think you will be even more surprised, but for clarity you should understand this tactic as “trick the straight public into thinking that they are protecting homosexuals from injustice:
“A media campaign that casts gays as society's victims and encourages straights to be their protectors must make it easier for those to respond to assert and explain their new protectiveness. Few straight women, and even fewer straight men, will want to defend homosexuality boldly as such. Most would rather attach their awakened protective impulse to some principle of justice or law, to some general desire for consistent and fair treatment in society. Our campaign should not demand direct support for homosexual practices, should instead take anti-discrimination as its theme. The right to free speech, freedom of beliefs, freedom of association, due process and equal protection of laws-these should be the concerns brought to mind by our campaign.”
And this crafty tactic is still to this day being successfully used on the public. People have been tricked for example into focusing on the Human Rights and Civil Rights aspects that has never been denied to any homosexual, while ignoring the manner in which they have twisted the issues and misapplied those rights to a sexual preference while making the public think they are just protecting their human and Civil rights. This is diabolical, but it demonstrates the power of manipulation when dealing with people who are so engrossed with media that their thinking can so easily be manipulated.
They even instruct their followers on how to counter our religious conviction by connecting their cause to laws and justice principles, knowing full well that their arguments for homosexuality could not stand on its own. Note the scheming mentality.
“It is especially important for the gay movement to hitch its cause to accepted standards of law and justice because its straight supporters must have at hand a cogent reply to the moral arguments of its enemies. The homophobes clothe their emotional revulsion in the daunting robes of religious dogma, so defenders of gay rights must be ready to counter dogma with principle.”
But you should know that what they call “principle”, is actually a twisted interpretation of the law to make that which is actually unjust, seem just. But there’s more, the next two tactics have noticeably been carried out in media for many years. Just about all of you can remember this if you just took a moment to think about programs you watched over the years on TV.
If you’re not feeling played, tricked, taken, hoodwinked and bamboozled at this point, then you may have already been so deceived about homosexuality that you don’t want to know the truth. I am going to keep trying though; your soul is worth it. Note tactic #4:
STEP 4: MAKE GAYS LOOK GOOD.
“In order to make a Gay Victim sympathetic to straights you have to portray him as Everyman. But an additional theme of the campaign should be more aggressive and upbeat: to offset the increasingly bad press that these times have brought to homosexual men and women, the campaign should paint gays as superior pillars of society. Yes, yes, we know--this trick is so old it creaks. Other minorities use it all the time in ads that announce proudly, "Did you know that this Great Man (or Woman) was _________?" But the message is vital for all those straights who still picture gays as "queer" people-- shadowy, lonesome, fail, drunken, suicidal, child- snatching misfits.
The honor roll of prominent gay or bisexual men and women is truly eyepopping. From Socrates to Shakespeare, from Alexander the Great to Alexander Hamilton, from Michelangelo to Walt Whitman, from Sappho to Gertrude Stein, the list is old hat to us but shocking news to heterosexual America. In no time, a skillful and clever media campaign could have the gay community looking like the veritable fairy godmother to Western Civilization.”
The trick here is not only to get the public to think in terms of homosexuals being normal everyday people (which many of them are), but also to get them to forget about their other side, the deviant behavior, the mental imbalance, substance abuse, violence against each other and the obsessions with perversion etc. This aspect of homosexuality is still the most dangerous and potent of their way of life, and it will become more pronounced as they gain power. What must be remembered is that homosexuality is wrong, sinful and perverse no matter how many famous people participated in it. “Celebrity” does not cancel out sin, perversion or deviance. But if you are caught off guard and allow the spin of media to influence your thinking, sooner or later, you will be thinking just as they want you to, focusing only on what they want you to. This has been their greatest power and it has blinded many people from their true nature. It should also be noted that some famous people that they list as homosexual were never homosexuals, but to just make the public think they were, gains them more influence. Lying and deception has been use as a very effective tool by them.
The next tactic is also one that you will recognize immediately as having been well carried out in media.
STEP 5: MAKE THE VICTIMIZERS LOOK BAD.
How often have you seen this on TV? Well here is why:
“At a later stage of the media campaign for gay rights-long after other gay ads have become commonplace-it will be time to get tough with remaining opponents. To be blunt, they must be vilified. (This will be all the more necessary because, by that time, the entrenched enemy will have quadrupled its output of vitriol and disinformation.) Our goal is here is twofold. First, we seek to replace the mainstream's self-righteous pride about its homophobia with shame and guilt. Second, we intend to make the antigays look so nasty that average Americans will want to dissociate themselves from such types.
The public should be shown images of ranting homophobes whose secondary traits and beliefs disgust middle America. These images might include: the Ku Klux Klan demanding that gays be burned alive or castrated; bigoted southern ministers drooling with hysterical hatred to a degree that looks both comical and deranged; menacing punks, thugs, and convicts speaking coolly about the "fags" they have killed or would like to kill; a tour of Nazi concentration camps where homosexuals were tortured and gassed.
A campaign to vilify the victimizers is going to enrage our most fervid enemies, of course. But what else can we say? The shoe fits, and we should make them try it on for size, with all of America watching.”
There you have it, the early agenda of the homosexual activist movement in their own words.
There are lots of questions that can be asked about their stated agenda. Having read for yourself the calculated strategy that they planned and carried out over the years, you should view their current popularity with a concern.
Now I suggest that if you are a Christian leader that you take the time to read material about their current added agendas, not written by them since they will not tell you all of what you need to know, but by competent Christian leaders who are keen enough to understand the clear and present danger these activists present to our society, and who have taken the time to investigate and report on their history and activities.
A few names that I can recommend are:
Dr. Michael Brown-“A queer thing happened to America”, and “Outlasting the Gay Revolution”
Robert Ryan- “Making Gay Okay”,
Scott Lively’s “Redeeming the Rainbow” and “The Pink Swastika”,
 After the Ball--Why the Homosexual Movement Has Won. Crosswalk.com ^ | June 3, 2004 | Dr. R. Albert Mohler, Jr.