The article includes a photo of this woman who via drugs has come to look very much like a man, “Brest” feeding her son that she had by artificial insemination. I believe that the word “artificial” has been dropped these days as being politically incorrect, but I have not been infected with the deception of the strange new non-reality “reality” that many seem to be so willingly a part of these days.
The article is basically a celebration of this woman who wants to be a man and her birth of a child, as if it is some great and wonderful thing that her sister must get the world to see through her eyes.
Naturally, she is referred to as “he” and “him” throughout the article, a testimony to the utter confusion of supposedly intelligent people. The irrationality and illogic of such foolishness is frightening, because it demonstrates just how far such people are willing to go to attempt to normalize their confusion and moral rebellion.
The piece is written with the usual novel type narrative style giving more details than necessary as if to make her experience more personal to us all, and hopefully persuade those of us not yet converted, to see her as a normal “male” human being. After all as the article states, “now that gay marriage is legal, the social battleground has shifted to new frontiers”. Indeed and so one would think that with all the “progress” homosexuals have made these last 10 years, there would be no longer a need for manipulation tactics, even this subtle kind. But they know that their agenda is so abnormal that they must keep pumping the illogical to the public, less people are given a moment to think clearly and began to see through their scam and all their hard work to deceived the public will then fall apart.
She goes on the say that “Transgender America have gained greater visibility and acceptance as stars like Caitlyn Jenner and Lavernce Cox have trained a pop-culture spotlight on Trans issues.”
This is true as I and others have pointed out, they rely heavily on “closet” homosexual celebrities posing as “progressive” non-homosexuals, and “out” homosexual celebrities
With mass public influence to help them sell their lies about homosexuality to the public. And yes, many other supposedly straight celebrities like Oprah and Tyra Banks who have massive public influence have served as virtual Gurus for the homosexual community. They have used their media power to promote homosexuality in just about all of its various categories.
The article goes on to boast support from corporate:
“Corporate leaders across the Fortune 500 have moved to protect their transgender employees.”
Indeed, anything to add to their bottom line given the much promoted claim that homosexuals have so much money to spend. Not to mention the undercover homosexuals targeting all Fortune 500 companies to work for and go up the ranks to make those changes in their favor.
But it is not only the Fortune 500 companies, homosexuals via instructions by homosexual activist groups like GLESEN have heavily targeted colleges, universities and public and private school as well, setting up "gay" clubs and organisations to recruit non-homosexual into their fold. They have also strategically taken jobs at these institutions so that they can create and control policies that favour the homosexuals. Often getting hired as "straights" and only coming out after they have acquired sufficient clout in the institution or after they have done all they could to make changes for homosexuals there while "in the closet".
It seems that Christians and the public have not yet appreciated just how tactical and at times even devious these homosexual activists can be. That has been their great benefit.
The article goes on to boast even more powerful support for homosexuals:
“And in May, the Obama Administration declared that all public schools must treat students equally regardless of their gender identity, classifying inner feelings of maleness and femaleness as protected by the government. We have come to the point where the President of the United States can candidly and comfortably discuss gender fluidity.”
I have already expressed my concerns about President Obama in my article “Obama-nation”, indeed, he has shown his dedication to the homosexual community, not only in what he has said publically in their favor, but also by his appointments and policies. He has proven to be just another example of what happens when a pastor fails to teach God’s word truthfully, efficiently and effectively. What is produced is a false "Christian" who uses the claim of "Christian" to mislead others.
It is possible that President Obama has done more to force Gods hand against our nation than any other president in our nation’s history. While none of this excuses the blatant disrespect that many prejudice White people in congress and other government agencies have shown towards him, anyone supporting him mainly for his color are not only foolish but are cohorts in his spiritual crimes against our nation.
Please note, I am not saying that all White people who don't like Obama are prejudice, nor am I condemning all White people as such. I have to say this because so many have been conditioned to misread anything that is said about White - black relations.
The article then makes this statement:
“We have also come to the point where the backlash against these rapid changes has manifest in sometimes surreal fashion, as did earlier this year during the so-called battle of the bathroom, when about half of all states joined lawsuits against the Obama Administration.”
The “backlash” in her mind is a bad thing but to us, it represents hope that there are still people out here that are not only paying attention to what homosexual activists are trying to do to our nation, but who are also taking actions to stop or at least slow the pace of their takeover. Note the phrase “rapid changes”, they now boldly acknowledge the swiftness with which they have been making strides in morally corrupting our nation. The question is, how, and why did the Christian Church allow it?
Her next two sentences reeks of their "alarm tactics" to both gain sympathy and demonize anyone who openly objects to or speaks out against homosexuality:
“There have been reports of increased violence directed at transgender people. At least 21 trans Americans were murdered in 2015, according to the Human Rights Campaign, up 62% from the year before. And that was before the mass murder in June at an Orlando nightclub, the deadliest incident of violence against LGBT people in U.S. history."
While neither I nor any “true” Christian condones or celebrates any violent actions against homosexuals, and we all in fact grieve at such lost, this should not prevent us from speaking the truth about homosexuality or homosexual activists agendas and actions. Nor should it prevent us from pointing out their manipulation tactics.
I acknowledge that there are those who commit violent acts against homosexuals, but that is true of blacks, the mentally ill, deformed people and even White people. This is not unique to homosexuals, and in fact many of those crimes against homosexuals are actually committed by other homosexuals, but this is rarely mentioned or even acknowledged. I would challenge that if homosexual-on-homosexual crimes were included in the statistics, they would prefer not to mention it.
And to use the statistics of the Human Rights Campaign, a pro-homosexual, atheist organization that is notorious for fabricating lies against Christians and Christian organizations and wrongly stigmatizing them as hate groups, speaks volumes about the writer’s motives.
And while all sane and moral people strongly objected to the killing of homosexuals in the Orlando nightclub, we cannot overlook the tendency of homosexual activists to use such tragedies as a springboard for manipulation and propaganda. Many of them shamefully use such terrible events to target their ideological enemies and publically blame them for the very act of violence when they know that they had absolutely nothing to do with it. An example are the many articles and statements that flooded the press and media containing comments to the effect that Christian teaching about homosexuality inspired the Muslim killer to slay those people at the Orlando homosexual club. This kind of shameful misrepresentation and misinformation is unfortunately common in homosexual activist writing and news reporting. But that is only one aspect of the many problems with homosexuality and how it is promoted and defended. Their publically stated goal to destroy the moral norms of society and corrupt the basic standards of male female relationship and family should be enough to concern any thinking person. That effort to confuse the biological norms and twist reality in the minds of the masses is quickly being accomplished, aided by their use of the media and articles like this. Notice her next statement:
“Pregnancies like Even’s-and the many that are likely to follow-will stretch our current perceptions of gender norms even further. Americans are just starting to open up to the idea that you may be born into a female body but believe that you are really a man. But what if you are born into a female body, know you are a man and still want to participate in the traditionally exclusive rite of womanhood? What kind of man are you then? This question can bother people. It can make them uncomfortable”
Thinking people would readily notice the utter confusion of this statement, the utter instability of this kind of thinking is at the heart of homosexuality in all its many facets and expressions. The reason “Americans are starting to open up to the idea” is because homosexual activists have to a great extent commandeered our medical industry, our media, or education systems and even our press and government, to propagate their false reality. And little is being done by the non-homosexuals in those institutions to prevent their dominance. The question is, why? Are they also aware of how devious some homosexual activists can be? Perhaps, but that should not prevent them from standing up against wrong.
Though we out number them more than one hundred to one, they have been strategic in their targeting and have placed themselves in areas of mass influence so that a few of them can influence many. And even though they have not influenced the majority, their control of the message via the various media in which they dominate has enabled them to give the public the impression that more people are in agreement with them than actually are.
They gained that ability through calculated craft, manipulation, intimidation, misinformation, misapplication and other tactic that eventually garnered them their seats of influence. To them this is a war of ideas and intellectual dominance, and they have made it clear that they understand the key tools necessary to winning it.
Yes, the question does indeed bother thinking people and make us uncomfortable, why, because we know this it is confusion and only contributes to the damage of our human society.
When she says: “I was excited for him, but also frightened. I thought about what strangers might say to my bearded, big-bellied little brother when he was nine months along. And I wondered, would he be safe”, she is again attempting to tap into our sympathy and pity to get us to see her sister whom she refers to as her brother, as a normal person endangered by evil people who refuse to see her as she wants to be seen, as a man with abilities of a women, and who wants to harm her for who she is, a she who thinks she is a he. While that is true for a very few, the greater reality is that people can see the insanity and utter confusion her action present to society and that is not something that she nor anyone else has the right to demand we do not see. Neither she nor any of her supporters have the right to insist that normal people adjust to her non-reality and force our children to have to deal with this kind of confusion. The utter audacity of such people to think that their confusion and indeed rebellion is more important or just as important as the reality of normal people is unacceptable. And for then to give the impression that all who reject homosexuality are out to physically harm them, or support those few who do, is devious.
She all but admits the dysfunction of her family that contributed to their homosexual lives: “our parents were supportive but distracted. They were in a protracted divorce after my father had, at 50 come out as gay. Katje and I dated women and I would kid Even that being gay wasn’t rebellious enough in our family; he has to do us one getter and change gender”. This dysfunctional family issue is a know major contributor to the many lose souls to homosexuality, but that does not excuse the life, we are all accountable to God for the decisions we make and the paths we chose to walk, and determining to continue on a path that is ungodly for the sake of our pleasure will certainly result in the diving judgment that our creator has promised to all who refuse to obey His word. (2 corinthians 5:10, Revelation 20:12)
She lightly acknowledges the mental health issues but as usual does not state how serious it really is. “Transgender birth parents often face more challenges when it comes to mental health". She mentions a study that highlighted psychological issues involved with trans pregnancies in which significant themes emerged….the trans were lonely and reported complex feelings about their gender identity. It also stated that such pregnancy “can lead men (women who claim they are men) to acknowledge that they still have female reproductive organs, which for many can be difficult…”
Can you see the confusion? Even in the language of intelligent medical professionals the illogic must persist in order to affirm the disorder as normal and good.
She goes on the mention her “brother’s” (sister’s) trans friend, a women who thought she was a man but had a baby, who also had difficulties because he (she) felt a traumatizing disconnect between his (her) masculinity (acquired via hormone injections) and the female attributes of his (her) body. Another trans dad (women who claimed she was a man and chose to have a baby) said that the pregnancy catapulted him (her) into depression saying: “it was as if all the things I’d hated about my body were re-emerging, and I felt awful about myself,”
Can you see the confusion? The disorder is clear but it is confidently ignored as such and discussed as just a depression. And because of the taboo of calling it what it is, such people will not get the psychological and spiritual help that they really need. In fact, they are hurrying to get as many laws passed as they can to prevent such help from being made available, actually making it a crime to provide or even offer it as an alternative. The goal is to allow only homosexual affirming treatment, and pretend that is the only thing that can help them. And claim that any thing less will only result in suicide.
She state that one trans dad (women) told her that he (she) believed he (she) would have killed himself (herself) during the early months of his (her) pregnancy if he (she) hadn’t found friends through the online trans group.
She told her that “all the mental-health stuff I had as a teenager came back” , referring to a time when he (she) was deeply depressed, and saying that her online friends were the only people who understood her.
In contrast to the many trans people who suffer from traumatic depression and other forms of traumatizing disconnects, those who “claim” they do not, still face serious issues with reality distortions.
She says her (sister) Even did not have any problem with depression but said that he (she) said “I just feels like it’s really cool that my body can do this”.
You really need to see past the attempt to make this seem normal, to what is really happening. A women having a baby while claiming to think she is a man, says she just thought it was cool that her body could do what a women’s body is supposed to do. Can you see the confusion?
They even have to invent new words to communicate their confusion since normal words would only reinforce reality, and they cannot have that if they are going to force society to adopt the non-reality.
While explaining how trans have online sites where they can go to get support (affirmation), she describes in homosexual language the kind of people who are serviced by the site as:
“People on the transfeminine spectrum, those who are genderfluid, nongendered folks, transmasculine individuals, and cisgender allies.” The author then state: (“I am cisgender. This means that my self-identity conforms to the gender of my biological sex. I was born a girl, and I feel like a woman.)”
This word invention is only a part of the homosexual activists desire to reshape reality in favor of their dysfunction. They also consistently redefine words to benefit their twisted perspective.
Also they commonly ignore the Christian perspective and act as if Christians do not exist, accept of course, when they are directly on the attack against Christians.
Later in the article, she says “To the medical professionals, he’s a trans guy, but to the rest of the world and to himself, he’s just a guy”. Note how easily she ignores God and His perspective, a perspective that is also shared by God’s people. To us, she is a confused woman who has chosen to rebel against God, and who seeks to establish the dysfunction and confusion as a norm.
In addition to name-dropping of people and businesses to give them free advertising and publicity, she also makes an effort to bring attention to the problems that trans are having in the medical industry finding people who understand their situation well enough to treat them. And faithful to the homosexual activists strategy, she is careful to make mention of how trans that were refused requested treatment sued and won their cases. That is usually a warning to anyone who would dare to deny them their desires.
She later states how her brother’s (sister’s) midwife and he (she) both marveled at the technological advances and social changes that have enabled the effort to make a family.
Indeed, technology is a marvel, but in the wrong hands it is also a tragedy, an abomination and eternal mark against a society that allows such blasphemy against the image and order of God.
Time Magazine is only on of many major news magazines that have given themselves over to the homosexual activist agenda, no doubt assuming that they can promote such abnormality and illogic to the benefit of society.
Only they hope, without the mandatory consequences or even the side effect of evil that must accompany any such leanings.
It is sad and in some ways shocking that so many “Christians” are allowing themselves to be deluted by the same agenda to the point that many of them have bought into the whole foolish idea that society can adopt such an anti-God ideology without suffering the dire consequences of divine judgment. (Psalms 9:17)
With all the manipulation going on, the greatest victims are those dear and precious souls who are homosexuals that are sincerely trying to overcome their disorder. They are the main people who are not only marginalized but are ignored or openly rejected by the homosexual activist community. And at times they are even ridiculed for seeking to overcome their same sex desires.
Our love for God and His truth must compel us to do our best to reach these homosexuals with the love of God and the truth of His word. We must not be intimidates by homosexual activist activity and tactics but we must rather be wise as serpents and harmless as doves. (Matthew 10:16)
All true Christians must remain awake and be all the more efficiently active in this spiritual war against God and His created human order. (Ephesians 5:11)
We must be as diligent as the homosexual activists, and like them target TV, press, Corporate, education, Hollywood and the government as places we must be deeply rooted in and active in the decision making policies as well as in the programing and messages sent out from these sources, to help them find their way to God. Failure to do so will result in the swift coopting of our society by those who have little or no respect for God. That surely will hasten the end of life as we know it.