You may not have bothered to notice, but there is a myth being spread in our society about homosexuals, a myth that gives them an appeal that they do not deserve.
It claims that homosexuals are richer, smarter, more talented, kinder, happier, more tolerant, and even more successful, than straight people, and that without them (homosexuals) the world could not exist, or at least it would be a bland, boring, and horrible place to be.
That is the impression you get when you watch TV, Cable, go to the movies or sit in a class at just about any public school or institution of higher education. And all that is taken as an undeniable evidence that homosexuality is not only good, but is wholesome and important to celebrate.
Yes some people who are homosexuals are smart, funny, friendly, neat, rich, successful and talented, but none of those things make homosexuality right nor are any of those thing unique to homosexuals, in fact, by true comparison, homosexuals are not numbered by straights, at least a million to one in all of those categories. So why are those attributes and characteristics presented in media, Hollywood and other places as if they are homosexual gifts to humanity?
Why have we allowed them to make it a crime to object to homosexuality or even voice our disagreement with the practice?
Why do we allow them to reinterpret actions, and redefine words so as to make their distorted lives seem normal and good?
Take “Love” for instance, everyone knows what love is, love can be defined in many way but there are things that can never be defined as love, yet we allow them to overstep the bounds of what actually can be defined as love, and venture into strange perversions and still call it love. Why.
When a child or an adult raises a dog from a pup, or nurses a dog from physical harm or sickness back to health, it generally results in a bonding between that animal and their human master. That bond is often very strong, so strong in fact that it is tantamount to a family bond. The human would do just about anything for the animal. That is love, a good love, a normal love.
But what if that human decides that they love that animal so dearly that they “fall in love” with the animal and began to perceive that animal as a sexual partner?
Instead of just allowing the dog to lick their face and at times even their mouth, now, when the dog licks their mouth they open their mouth and lick the dog’s tongue, the dog now shares the same bed with them and eat at the same table as they do. But worst, they get naked and attempt to have sexual relations with the dog. Can that actually be called love?
Let me give you another example, lets say a man who has a successful business and makes lots of money decides to adopt a child he has seen in an adoption center. The child is 11, lets say a male. The man goes through the adoption process and is granted custody of the boy and they live together for a year in a normal parent child relationship. They form a bond and that is indeed a normal love. But then it becomes clear that the man had an arterial motive for adopting the boy, he is a boy lover, a secret member of NAMBA, an organization that promotes MAN/BOY sexual relations.
And lets say that the man begins to violate the boy while telling him that it is because he loves him. And lets say that the boy, being confused begins to enjoy what the man is doing to him sexually and eventually begins to willingly consent to the sexual relationship, even asking for it. Is that LOVE?
In our current state in which those who dominate the media, government and many education institutions, are either homosexual, ultra liberal and or suffer from some other kind of moral depravity that they have deem a privilege of freedom to be forced upon society, the projected opinion over the airwaves is yes.
To the rational, thinking person who has not been effectively brainwashed by the careful and extensive programing of the morally twisted TV and Movie executives, producers, writers and actors, or by book authors and publishers etc., the answer is and always will be NO.
But what about those who say it is love? Well, first it must be acknowledge that not everyone who publicly state their support for such perversion are actually in support of such sickness. Many who openly express support for such depravity, do so because of their commitment to the propagators of such depravity with which they are in financial partnership, and they are simply protecting their financial investment, they are protecting their money. Others agree because they are deeply close to family members or friends who practice such depravity and they want to support their loved one. Additionally, there are those who have their own immoral vices and fetishes and don’t want anyone calling them strange for having them, and so they feel obligated to support the strange behavior of others. You see there are many reasons for support of depravity that people often don’t think about.
Now, I know what the common arguments are against such observations as I have just made, homosexual activists will object to any kind of comparison between homosexuality and bestiality or pedophilia. They will condemn such comparison as harsh and mean. But I will counter, by asking them on what bases do they object?
They will say that homosexuality is nothing like bestiality or pedophilia. And they will arrogantly demand an apology for even suggesting that there was a comparison.
But they would not stop there, that would be too easy to refute. So what they will try to do is make me feel as if I was the worst person on earth, by calling me every degrading name they can think of, (as if those names will actually define me), and hope that such accusations will cause me to be so ashamed that I will withdraw my analogy and apologize.
The sad fact is that such a counter attack has been extremely affective in the past and for that reason, homosexual activists and their supporters have made name calling and accusations a standard method of counter attack against anyone who dared to say or do anything to make homosexuality look like anything but a normal wholesome activity.
Additionally, when the person who has made such an “unacceptable” comparison to homosexuality, or said anything derogatory or unfavorable about homosexuality, is a public figure or a professional who owns a business, the homosexual activists will generally launch a massive campaign against them in the media and in his community, in an effort to destroy his business and his means of making a living. Boycott, attacking any corporate sponsors or material supplier he has, and any other tactic that will effectively cut off that person’s cash flow.
This is the kind of hostile actions homosexual actives have been using for many years to prevent moral people or anyone who objects to homosexuality from confidently speaking out against homosexuality.
But why are such harsh tactics necessary to defend homosexuality? And why does a civilized free society allow such behavior to go on?
As to the first question, homosexual activists know that they have no moral ground to stand on; neither do they have a logical foundation on which to defend their depravity. Therefore, they must protect their depravity by force, and to do that, they would first have to get at least some level of control of the institutions that could execute such force, such as media, education, government, Hollywood and the judiciary. This they have apparently done.
And to date they have added many to their list of victims, and have effectively shut them down, and even forced some to undergo “sensitivity training”.
My question is, how and why did the Christian church allow such hostile entities as homosexual activists organizations to gain such a level of control in our society?
And why are Christian organizations so silent, dormant or supportive of this homosexual agenda?
Why are so many Christian Leaders afraid to even say that homosexuality is a serious sin and even renounce the few Christian celebrities and leaders who do openly take a stand against homosexuality?
And in fact, why is there no united effort among Christian organizations to safeguard Christians from legal retribution and business assassination for daring to contend with homosexual activism? What is going on?
Ex-homosexuals and their organizations are poorly supported by the Christian churches or Christian individuals, major books by Christian authors that expose the homosexual agenda or provide intelligent and important insight into how we can understand their tactics and strategies and effectively counter them, as well as execute proactive agendas of our own, are poorly supported by the Christian Community.
Counter homosexual Christian organizations that specialize in providing love, counseling and support for homosexuals seeking deliverance from their homosexuality, are poorly funded or supported, Christian speakers who specialize in giving talks to educate Christians and Christian organizations on how to combat the homosexual agenda and protect their congregations and families are not in demand by Churches. And when such events are held, they are generally poorly attended by Christians; unless they are being done by mega churches (of which few are).
The question that needs to be asked of our Christian leaders is, why?
What will it take to get them to pool their resources together and finally let to homosexual activists know that they will no longer be punked by homosexual activist threats.
What will it take to get Christian pastors and organisations to more fully support organisations like "THE RESTORED HOPE NETWORK" and "LOVE & TRUTH NETWORK"? (we are not affiliated with either of these organisations but fully support that work that they do).
I am concerned by the lack of support that events that focus on informing the Church about such things are so poorly supported and attended here in New York, and elsewhere. And I would love to hear the reason. I wait patiently for an answer.