I often write about how important it is for us as Christians to be extremely careful about what we accept and repeat as truth, and I stress the fact the God does indeed hold us accountable for
anything that we say and do that is not true or right. But it is also important for us to take a stand against those who would promote lies and unrighteousness.
Just being correct is not enough, we must also be active in the efforts to defend truth and expose lies and deceptions where ever we see it.
 
Granted, this is not an easy task, but then, fighting against evil and ungodliness never is. That is why God gave us His promise to be with us in our struggles against the enemy.
 
But I do not only strive to encourage others to take a stand, I do so myself. And as evidence of my commitment to the struggle for truth, I am posting this article response to a local writer in our Herald newspaper who I have noticed for years has been  an aggressive defender for leftists politics and ideas through here articles. I recently contacted her and requested an interview with me on Zoom, and I am waiting her reply. But in anticipation of her decline, I have decided to write a response to her recent article. I encourage not only your comments but your criticisms if any, as it will help me to do a better job and improve my efforts.
 
My reply to the
RANDI KREISS article titled:
"A nation divided by pandemic, or splintered?"
Posted February 17, 2022 on the Herald website.
(Note: I think our nation is divided by devious deceivers, mostly on the Left, and far right, but some even among conservatives, who manipulate the easily influenced masses).

Randi Kreiss opens with this statement:
 
“Early in the coronavirus pandemic, it was easy to write off as stupid the folks who touted hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin as go-to Covid-19 treatments. Easy because the efficacy of those drugs was refuted by the best virologists in the world.”
 
I have to ask her, what Virologists? Why did you not provide a reference? And why did you not bother to mention the fact that Hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, among other low cost treatments were documented by medical professionals to successfully treat Covid? Why did you not include the fact that Ivermectin was a well-known medicine that was so well known that it was a Nobel Prize winning medicine? Why did you not mention the fact that Hydroxychloroquine was used world-wide for many years and was a very well established medical treatment for covid viruses? Your comments reek of bias and disinformation. Yet you pretend to be concerned for your reader’s accurate education on these matters. How dare you lie to your readers.
 
She continued:
 
“It seemed obvious that people who denied the science of vaccine protection and masking were coming from a place of ignorance. They didn’t know better.”
 
My question is:
Based on what? Why is it necessary to lump the Covid shots with all vaccines, if the covid shots are so great, they should be able to stand on their own, and not be lumped in with past known profitable vaccines. Just because we reject the Covid shots as safe and reliable, does not mandate a label of “anti-vaxxers”, that is cruel and dishonest, but then, being cruel and dishonest about conservatives and anyone who goes against your leftists narrative is acceptable, is it not?
And what “evidence” are you relying on that gives you the right to promote the claim that masks protect from Covid? Why are you lying to your readers, by telling them that masks are helpful as protection, when you should know that they are not? Why are you not telling your readers that humans are not supposed to breathe in what they breathe out? Tell them about the danger of long term wearing of masks. Why don’t you tell them that the covid virus is way too small for a standard mask to block it?
 
She continues:
 
“As hundreds of thousands got sick and died, and the virus spread, many of us hoped people would change their minds and take the vaccine — not just for themselves, but also for the common good.”
 
Again I ask, based on what “evidence” did you hope for that change of mind? On what did you base your view that the covid shots would be for the common good? What benefit was the insufficiently tested covid shots to those who took them? Did they not first claim the shots would cure and prevent Covid? Did they not then after multiple millions got the shots, changed their claims when it became clear to the public and to honest medical professionals and scientists that the shots were not only not providing the claimed protections, but were causing much medical harm, change their claim and say that the shots would minimize the harmful effects of covid, and prevent hospitalization and death from covid? And is it not true that that too has been proven to be a lie, as many who have taken the covid shots have still died of covid? Why are you so willing to lie to your readers? Are you receiving payment for your propagation of such lies? Or are you simply satisfied to be among those who defend the leftist narrative.
 
She then said:
 
“But over these two years, there hasn’t been much of a learning curve. The anti-vaxxers stood firm. Many of them got Covid. An unthinkable number died. And still, people refuse to believe the simple scientific fact that vaccines keep people safer.”
 
My reply to her is:
 
You are still not being honest about this Randi, first, just because we do not trust the covid shot, does not make us “anti-vaxxers”, so your dishonest use of that term is rude and disrespectful. Second, you are being dishonest or horribly ignorant about the actual causes of those many deaths. It has been well established, that the majority of those deaths could have been avoided, had it not been for the criminal activity of the CDC, FDA, NIH and the Government’s trust in them, which resulted in the adoption of criminal policies that prevented early treatment of Covid, (by those many foolish medical professionals who allowed themselves to be dictated to by the CDC, FDA and NIH, instead of doing their jobs as medical professionals), policies that favored Big Pharma and experimental covid shots over the lives of sick patients. Policies that forbad the use of known low cost medicine that could and did successfully treat Covid, in favor of high cost medicines like Remdesivir, and the use of ventilators which harmed covid patients. All of this information is available, but you prefer to only tap your leftists sources for your reporting, you are not interested in doing real research before you report, only in parroting what big pharma, the CDC, FDA NIH and those government officials who are heavily invested in big pharma and all of who are making a killing financially off of the vaccines and masks.
 
She continued:
 
“When thousands of folks who were double-vaccinated and boosted started getting breakthrough cases of the Omicron variant, that only reinforced the resistance among anti-vaxxers.”
 
I replied:
No kidding? But it was not only the failed covid shots that reinforced our resistance, but it was also, the rise of reported damages that were caused by the covid shots, that were being ignored or denied by the media, big pharma, dishonest government officials, the suspicious need to coerce people to take the shots by using bribes and then FOURCE through mandates that reinforced our resistance. It was also the fact that known successful low cost treatments for covid, were vilified so that the covid shots could be unjustly accelerated through emergency use protocols. And the many lies about the covid shots constantly promoted through the media, commercial after commercial, with not one warning of any adverse effects, and the massive censorship of the media and big tech, that blocked out any efforts to warn or inform the public about the dangers of the covid shots, and the lies being promoted about their safety. Oh yes, Randi, we had plenty of reasons to resist, and you did not care, nor do you care about this now. You just keep pumping that pro-covid shot narrative and trying to discredit anyone who does not agree with it. 
 
She continued:
 
“Over time, some of us liberal-minded opinion writers tried to be less judgmental and more empathic. Maybe we could understand where the doubters were coming from. Many people had justifiable grievances: The rollouts were uneven, or the messaging was sometimes confusing. Fringe groups offered comfort in troubling times.
Many of us engaged in intellectual gymnastics, trying to understand, to be patient and more tolerant of the resistance to vaccines and masks.”
 
My reply is:
 
Again, you carefully and dishonestly understate your negligence, their crimes were far worse than uneven roll outs and confusing messaging, and you know it.  I have stated just a few above, so you again, disrespect your readers by lying to them. I ask, why? Is it so important to you to toe the line of those who are making crazy money from the covid shots that you are willing to lie to your readers? You do know that much of the false information that you all have been pumping into the public will eventually come back to bite you don’t you? Or are you counting on the left perpetually stealing elections so that they never have to worry about being brought up on charges, and your role in deceiving the public fully come to light? Truth pressed down will eventually rise. Some of the truth is pouring over into major media now and I notice the efforts to down play it as insignificant. The failed lock downs, the illegal mandates, the ineffectiveness of masks, the claim of the possible defeating of covid, the Wuhan lab as the origin of the Corona virus, the lies of Anthony Fauci, the plot of Fauci and Francis Collins to silence science experts, the false reports from the prestigious LANCET that were exposed, the efforts of Pfizer and the FDA to prevent the public from seeing the research that led to the FDA’s approval of the Pfizer shot. The list goes on and on. And yet here you are still pumping away your rhetoric about how good the “vaccines” are and how, ignorant we conservatives and so-called “anti-vaxxers” are for not falling in line with your lies.
 
She continued:
 
“Maybe we could bring the doubters along in time, we thought.
We were wrong. We are now more than two years in, with more than 900,000 dead. This is what I know:”
 
I replied:
 
Pardon me, but you have showed us what you “know” and it is clearly not much. You have not demonstrated that the nine hundred thousand deaths were actually caused by covid. You know, or you should know about the many reports exposing the fabricated deaths supposedly due to covid, that were actually due to other causes, but conveniently attributed to covid, due mainly to the financial incentive to list hospital deaths as covid. But rather than mention that, you prefer to give the impression that all claimed covid deaths, are accurate and that the CDC, the FDA and the NIH and hospitals around the nation are honest and have no motive to lie about covid deaths.   I would like to know why.
 
She continued:
 
“What we are suffering in America today isn’t a break, it’s a compound fracture. There aren’t two opposing groups tugging at one another. It isn’t just people who get vaccinated and those who won’t. There are multiple splinters in this gaping wound — some sharp, some violent, some groups out for power, and some out for blood.
Some people are ignorant: They don’t — or can’t — read the research from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. And they have lost faith in our government.”
 
My reply is:
 
Surprisingly, this is the first thing you have said so far that I can actually agree with. But then you have to go and spoil it by injecting your common leftists “TRUMP IS THE REASON FOR OUR PROBLEMS” mantra.
 
She continued:
 
“Another splinter is people who are not only ignorant about science, but put their faith in a former president and his acolytes. In their reality, the political supersedes all other considerations.”
 
I replied:
Now I find this interesting, that you feel the need to attach Trump to the convictions and actions of people. You seem to think that all people who chose Trump over Hillary and Biden are blind, brainless Trump Zealots. That makes it much easier for you to criticize us without having to have an intelligent dialogue with us. Because then you would have to defend your rhetoric, and you are not interested in doing that, now are you? How easy it is for you to champion the covid shots while at the same time denying or ignoring the role that your hated of TRUMP played in their availability. How honest of you.
It is also interesting that you feel that you have to constantly deride Trump and his supporter even though he is no longer in office. This is clearly an effort on your part to do what you can to help see to it that he does not ever come back. And so you have to find Trump supporters who did not trust Biden and use them as an example of how foolish all Trump supporters are?
She then said:
 
“MAGA folks think the Biden administration is out to get them. At one point, people were posting notes online urging relatives to go into hospitals and remove their family members who were being treated for Covid. “They are trying to kill us,” one post said.”
 
To which I reply:
 
It has already been established that most people who died of Covid in the hospitals, have indeed died due to medical negligence in their faulty treatment of covid. And so I could not agree more with their assessment, but this is not only do to Biden’s evils, it happened under Trumps watch as well, because he foolishly trusted greedy people like Fauci and his organization, along with the WHO, the CDC and the FDA to set policies that KILLED PEOPLE.
 
She continued:
 
“Sadly, many GOP officeholders are willing to traffic in lies to keep power.”
 
My reply is:
 
While that is certainly possible, I find it strange that you did not include Democrats in that comment. Are you suggesting that there are none or not many Democrats who hold office, that are willing to and indeed do traffic in lies to keep power? If so, shame on you.
 
She then said:
 
“Then there is the splinter of smart, highly educated people who are shamelessly harnessing the suspicion among millions of our citizens to their own political ends.”
 
My reply is that it is interesting that you think that there is only a “splinter” of smart, highly educated people (apparently on our side), who use the suspicion of millions to their own political ends. Yet you don’t mention or seem to think that there are such people on your side, who do the same. If so, why did you not include them? If not why? Are you suggesting that all of the smart people on your side are upstanding and above political reproach?  That would be another clear lie. I have found that in all of my reading and comparing, that there are far more dishonest Democrat, leftists liberals than there are unscrupulous conservatives, (and indeed there are some, though I would not even call them true conservatives).  So what is your point in even listing them here? If you are not going to be honest, why not just tell your readers that you are attempting to poison their minds against conservatives and Trump and his supporters, that you are not really interested in providing an honest review of the state of the covid pandemic.
 
She then had the nerve to say:
 
“They know the vaccines work. They know masking protects against infection. But they challenge the necessary mandates.”
 
My reply is:
But that is just the problem, we know they don’t work, and for you to keep insisting they do is not only dishonest but disrespectful to your readers. But that is not enough for you is it, no, you have to name names and give your readers targets to hate and distrust don’t you? So here we go:
 
She then directly attacked conservatives by name:
 
“Think Ted Cruz, Ron DeSantis, Kellyanne Conway, Ivanka Trump, Jared Kushner, Lindsey Graham and Mitch McConnell. They are among the most reprehensible of the lot because they know better.”
 
My reply is that:
 
To call people “reprehensible” because they hold and promote views about politics and social and cultural issues that are different from yours, is what is reprehensible. How arrogant of you, how unkind of you, how presumptuous of you, to think that you and your side are the epitome political, social and cultural excellence.
 
She then attacked Marjorie Taylor Greene saying:
 
“Someone like Marjorie Taylor Greene, an anti-masker and a general nut case, is a splinter unto herself. In a recent infamous speech, Greene said that Nancy Pelosi was using secret police in Congress, like the “gazpacho.” She meant “Gestapo,” of course, because she can never resist a Holocaust reference in her crazy accusations. If Donald Trump was and is a cancer in our American culture, then she is his metastasis.”
 
My reply is:
 
Is it really necessary to call people names and degrade them because of their views? Why not just point out what she said that is wrong? Is it not because you are desperate to make your readers view all conservatives as dangerous and many as “nut cacses”? Just dealing with their views and explaining why they are wrong is not sufficient for you, (if possible at all), you have to rudely call them names. Sad. 
 
She then said:
 
“There are also splinters of responsible people who understand and support the coronavirus science, but still have reservations about boosters or inoculating little kids. Many are impatient with the slow progress toward even more targeted vaccines and better therapeutics.”
 
To which I ask:
 
So those of us who do not support coronavirus science, do not understand it? That is rude, in fact, you have said a lot of rude things in your article, which by the way is why I have chosen to use a rude method to respond. It is not only the people who support coronavirus who are “responsible people”, many of us who reject your “coronavirus science”, are also responsible people. That is why we chose to let the real science have its day, rather than the big pharma controlled narrative. Keep your stinking hands off of our children and our bodies, with your dangerous, unsafe, experimental, insufficiently tested, hidden ingredients, ineffective against Covid shots.
 
She then had the nerve to say:
 
“We forget that the development of the vaccines was an astonishing medical achievement. Everyone is fatigued after two years of isolation and stress.”
 
To that I say:
How interesting that you could not bring yourself to mention then President Trump’s role in getting those wonderful covid shots to the masses. This is not honest or fair. If you are going to sing the praises of the Covid shots, why can’t you acknowledge the role that Trump played in making them available to the public? Could it be that you hate him so much, that you can’t even mention anything that he did that YOU “THINK” was good? Is that honest? Is that reasonable or decent?
 
I happen to think that Trump was a fool to fast track the vaccines, that he played right into the hands of the pharmaceutical powers that milked the US government and governments of the world for billions for a product that they knew did not work and was dangerous, but would give them continuous profits.
In spite of that, you think they are good and yet you won’t give Trump an ounce of credit for them….very interesting.
 
She then said:
 
“These varied splinters unite to one end: to challenge vaccines and protective masks. The resistance crosses social, educational and cultural lines.”
 
 My reply to her is:
 
Now I find it very interesting that you left out some major “splinters”, like the W.H.O., NIH, the FDA, the CDC, Big Pharma, Big Tech, the many medical professionals who sold their souls to not only keep their jobs, but to advance in their jobs by helping to promote the lies told about the covid shots, successful alternative treatments for covid, masks, mandates and the unvaccinated. So many other “splinters” that you did not think were important to mention. Why is that Randi? And why do you not mention the credentials of the many medical and science professionals who put their reputations on the line to speak the truth about the lies that were and still are being told about Covid shots, Lock downs, mandates, masks and alternative covid treatments that work?  
 
She concluded by saying:
 
“The saddest group, I think, is those who are uninformed and vulnerable. They reject the science and the advice of the experts because they are caught in a paralyzing spasm of paranoia and anger. They are being cruelly used by the most heartless group, the super-smart members of the Republican Party who are stepping over dead bodies in a rush toward 2024.”
 
My reply is:
 
It is amazing how disingenuous you are Randi, all of this to promote your political warfare against the Republicans, to help your Democrats win in 2024. You know that your Biden has done such a horrible job and has exposed just how power hungry the left is, that it will be extremely difficult for them to win in 2024, without an even greater plot in place to steal the next election. And so you are doing your part to gain favor with the Democrats, I suspect you will be running for local office yourself someday soon.
 
Just what experts are you referring to that the uninformed are rejecting? Experts like Dr. Peter McCullough, like Dr. Robert Malone (inventor of the mRNA technology), like Dr. Mike Yeadon, former VP at Pfizer? What experts are you referring to? Oh yeah, those who are neck deep in Big Pharma money, and would die before giving up their lucrative connection to that kind of security.
 
Anyone who wants to get the other side of the story, from a better source than the Herald’s Randi Kreiss and News outlets like CNN, MSNBC, Rachel Maddow, The View, CBS, ABC, the New York Times, The New York Post, the Daily News, ten ten wins news radio, and the Washington Post, can visit the following sites:
The high wire.com
The Children’s Health Defense
Dr. Macola-Take control of your health
 
NOTE: I have contacted Randi Kreiss and requested and interview with her on zoom. I am waiting for her reply. On Feb. 19, she requested more information about me and my reason for wanting to interview her. I replied and now I am waiting her response. I posted this article anticipating that she would not consent to an interview. And because her article is already published and written in her usual condescending and rude manner towards conservatives.

My other articles addressing this issue are linked here
My reply to the PAofW's Health, Education & Welness-Panel
A Pandemic that reveals corruption, deception & wickedness
My response to Insiders Tom Porter concerning Del Bigtree
My commentary of  the Wide-Angle's interview with Dr. Hooman Noorchashm


Update: No 2-28-22 I received what may be the last communication from Randi Kreiss of the Freeport Herald, and as I suspected, she is not interested in having an open discussion about what she wrote. So my publishing my article when I did was the right call after all.

I did not think she would want to meet on a level platform, because then she could not get away with lying without being challenged. But my article still does challenge her. My letter to the editor does not contain the details of my objections as do my article above here. The reason being that It would be a waist of time to challenge the false covid information since our state is a pro-covid shot state and MUST follow the narrative of the powers that be. But what my letter to the editor did was point out her venom and rude disrespect in her writing. She did not have the decency to express her disagreement with professionalism and restraint. Lets see what comes of my letter. Our full exchange follows:

On Feb 19, 2022, at 3:55 PM, Danzil -afjm@afjm.net wrote:
Hi Randi:
I am a resident of Freeport, NY and I have been reading your column for some time now.
I recently read your article "A NATIONS DIVIDED BY PANDEMIC, OR SPLINTERED?"
And i would like to interview you about it.
I would only require 15 minutes.
Thank you.
Dan
AFJM

RANDI KREISS <ranzi@aol.com>:
Hello Dan
Can you explain who you are and in what capacity you would like me to sit for an interview?
Thanks
Randi

On 25 Feb 2022, at 3:43 PM, Danzil afjm@afjm.net wrote:
Randi:
I am a writer as yourself, and I am a resident of Freeport.
There is much in your article that I do not understand, and conclusions that you draw that you do not explain or support with sources.
And I am interested in discussing the content with you so that you can represent yourself rather than me assuming that I understand you correctly. I will be reporting on your article, and I want to do so fairly.

On 27 Feb she replied:
“You can report on anything you like. My column stands on its own. You are welcome to comment in a letter to the editor.
Good luck.”

Note the arrogance, note the reluctance to meet, and be clear, she thinks that she is untouchable, and that is because of her connections no doubt. She is not concerned about her disinformation being challenged or punished, and she my have good reason for not being concerned. Nevertheless, I will at lease make an effort to expose her to anyone who will pay attention. This is a good example of what I mean when I talk about what the major media says and how it differs from the truth. Just for the record, I am also including here the brief letter to the editor that I sent to the editor of the Herald.

Freeport Herald
February 23, 2022
Dear Freeport Herald Editor:

I recently read the column by Randi Kreiss titled:
“A nation divided by pandemic, or splintered?”
She calls people “stupid”, she equates people who like Trump as being “ignorant of science” and who puts politics over all else. That is disrespectful, and unprofessional.

She seems to have a fetish for “attacking” Trump rather than just pointing out his faults with respect. She called him a “cancer”.
She then attacks GOP officeholders as people who are “lie promoters for power”.
Then proceeds to attack 8 Republicans by name, and she refers to them as “reprehensible” and called one a “nut” and Trump’s Metastasis. This is clearly not respectable disagreement. It is literary political hostility towards Trump and Republicans, and it is unprofessional.
She calls the Republicans “a heartless group” who cruelly use the uninformed and vulnerable. And who are stepping over dead bodies in their rush towards 2024. It was clearly a political hit piece article.

This is not the first or only time that Randi Kreiss has had a
scathing anti- Republican/Trump article published in the Herald. See, “Is it fair to ban Trump from social Media?”. Thanks for reading my concerns.
Dan Monk Sr. Freeport, NY

I was only allowed 200 words so I had to leave out many of my other objections. But I include them in my published response to her that is available on line. The link is above.

(Reprinted by permission)
 
Submitted by Larry Buford O.B.O. The Simon Family
Chicago, Illinois – It is with heavy hearts that the Simon family announces the death of Bishop Joe Simon (former R&B singer), who passed away Monday, December 13, 2021. Joe Simon was best known as a Grammy Award winning, rhythm and blues legend, and most recently as a celebrated gospel singer and minister.

Joe Simon (known as the “Mouth of the South”) was born in Simmesport, Louisiana. He pursued a solo singing career, and in 1964 debuted his first major hit single with the song “My Adorable One.” This was quickly accompanied by other fan favorites such as “Teenager’s Prayer,” “Hanging On,” and “The Chokin’ Kind.”

In 1970, Simon was awarded a Grammy for Best Male R&B Vocal Performance. That same year he moved to Spring Records where in 1971 he released the #3 R&B hit “Drowning in the Sea of Love.” Then, in 1972, Simon reached #1 on the R&B charts with the hit single “The Power of Love” which earned him another gold record.

Joe Simon also famously wrote the theme song for the movie Cleopatra Jones in 1973. A steady stream of hits eventually landed him at number 8 on the Hot 100 and another #1 hit (his third) on the R&B charts with the 1975 song “Get Down, Get Down.” Over his brilliant musical career, Joe Simon amassed songs in the Pop Top 40 eight times and 38 times in the R&B Top 40 including three number one hits and three gold records. His influence spanned decades and genres as his signature sound and music was sampled by other major artists like Outkast, 50 Cent, Lil’ Kim, and Joss Stone.

In the early 1980’s Joe Simon felt a call from God and decided to remove his distinct tenor/baritone/bass voice from the secular music scene and devoted it to Christianity. He became an ordained minister and began evangelist preaching and singing gospel music. Simon went on to produce and release gospel albums including “Lay My Burden Down” (1983) and “This Story Must Be Told” in the late 1990’s.

In 1999 Joe Simon was inducted into the Rhythm and Blues Foundation and honored with their Pioneer Award for his music, and has also been inducted into the Gospel Music Hall of Fame. On August 24, 2017, a portion of the Louisiana Highway that runs through Simmesport was named Joe Simon Boulevard. At the reception, Joe was inducted into the Louisiana Music Hall of Fame, making him the first artist to be inducted into a religious and secular music hall of fame.

As the leader of Bishop Joe Simon Ministries, a not-for profit organization that provides humanitarian services and community outreach, Bishop Simon worked tirelessly to help others. Through his organization, he established educational opportunities, transportation and support for underserved youth. He also was an active leader in the fight for civil rights and promoted justice and equality around the world. Simon’s life serves as a reminder to us all to trust in God and lean not on your own understanding.

Simon is lovingly survived by his wife, Melinee Simon, his children, grandchildren, great grandchildren, sisters, brother and a host of other family and friends. He will be greatly missed by all, but his voice, his laugh and his legacy will live on.
Funeral arrangements are pending.
 
Originally printer in yournews.com



Get to know Joe Simon through his autobiography click here

Part One
By Danzil Monk Sr.
 
HOMOSEXUALITY- WHAT IT IS AND IS NOT
 
Homosexuality is a psychological, emotional and spiritual disorder that drives people who are affected by it to have sexual desires towards their same sex. Although many homosexual and pro-homosexual activists try to deny the central role that sex plays in the homosexual practice and what constitutes a person being classified as a homosexual, the fact is that same sex sexual engagement is the primary drive of homosexuality.
 
"In English the word homosexual was first used in 1892 in the English translation of Krafft-Ebing's "Psychopathiasexualis" which was a reference work, in German, on sexual perversions. It first appeared in 1886 and was enormously popular, being reprinted about once a year!"[1]
“Terms used to describe homosexuality have gone through many changes since the emergence of the first terms in the mid-19th century. In English, some terms in widespread use have been sodomite, Sapphic, Uranian, homophile, lesbian, gay, and same-sex attracted. Some of these words are specific to women, some to men, and some can be used of either. Gay people may also be identified under the umbrella termsqueer and LGBT.”[2]
“from homo-, comb. form of Gk. homos "same" (see homo- (1)) + Latin-based sexual. "Homosexual" is a barbarously hybrid word,….;It is, however, convenient, and now widely used.” [3]
 
What It Is Not
 
Homosexuality is not a feeling of fondness, strong love, respect, appreciation and deep friendship for a person of the same sex. Such feelings are important and are an essential part of human existence and civilization. The deepest and most admirable of this kind of love is demonstrated between David and Jonathan 1 Samuel 18:3 and 2 Samuel 1:26 and between Ruth and Naomi  Ruth 1:16-17 and the ultimate expression is in Jesus Christ towards humanity.
 
Homosexuality occurs when those normal and necessary feelings are perverted into something more than what they should be, when they are sexualized and used to drive a sexual desire for the same sex.
Normal, natural relationships with the same sex are limited NON SEXUAL DESIRES. Thus any sexual desires between two people of the same sex that include touching inappropriately, holding inappropriately or kissing inappropriately, and talking sexually inappropriately with sexual intent and meaning are examples of crossing the line of decency over into sinful disordered sexual activity.
 
The above description is important to grasp, because the homosexual activists community has as a major part of their agenda’s strategy, to propagate misinformation about homosexuality in order to make it appealing to the public. And many of them propagate ideas of promiscuity, and pornography to draw the unsuspecting into their web of sexual immorality. Such tactics are often effective on impressionable youth who have not been sufficiently taught about healthy biblical sexuality that is normal, and homosexuality and its depravity.  And it can be effective on adults who have been abused or who are addicted to drugs or high on drugs.
 
Thus, homosexual activists often lie about aspects of what homosexuality is to confuse the issue and to make nailing down key aspects of the condition difficult so that they can create the impression or illusion that homosexuality is normal and little different from heterosexuality.
 
Their goal is to sanitize homosexuality in the eyes of the public so that its depravity is not recognizable.
This is why we see so many favorable images of homosexuality displayed on TV, in the press and in the movies.
 
For a detailed examinations of their efforts to normalize homosexuality, see my article “HOW AMERICA AND MANY “CHRISTIANS” HAVE BEEN CONNED BY THE HOMOSEXUAL ACTIVIST COMMUNITY”

They even hijacked the word “gay” that simply means “happy” to apply to themselves to give the impression that the homosexual practice is fun and happy when in truth it is filled with depravity and harm, emotionally, psychologically, physically and spiritually.
 
For more information on how homosexuals redefine words to promote their immoral views, see my article  “HOMOSEXUAL ACTIVISTS REDEFINE WORDS TO MANIPULATE” 
 
Other terms suggested and used to disconnect homosexuality from its same sex sexual activity are “Androphilia” and “Gynephilia”.  Note this comment from wikipidia:
“Academia continues to coin related terms, including androphilia and gynephilia which designate only the object of attraction, thus divorcing the terms from sexual orientation entirely.”[4]
As I said, the effort of homosexual activists are to sanitize or clean up the image of homosexuality by use of all kinds of methods. One such method is to apply good sounding words like “Gay” to replace their more accurate titles as “Sodomites”. “Sodomite” is the more appropriate word because it relates to the first major appearance in the Bible of homosexuals and their common devious and obsessive behavior.
 
As stated in the following quotes, the desire is to distance themselves from words that project the accurate state of homosexuals which is offensive to them.
“Some gay people argue that the use of homosexual as a noun is offensive, arguing that they are people first and their homosexuality being merely an attribute of their humanity.”[5]

Yet their very categorization as people who practice having sex with their same sex, and their demand for rights to have their sexual practices normalized, honored and celebrated makes them the ones who push their sexuality in front of their humanity. The quote continues:
“Even if they do not consider the term offensive, some people in same-sex relationships may object to being described as homosexual because they identify as bisexual+, or another orientation”[6]

This is because the confusion of homosexuality branches of into all kinds of strange sexual behavior and as stated above, they all want to be acknowledge for their particular brand of homosexual preferences.

Wikipedia continues:
“Some style guides recommend that the terms homosexual and homosexuality be avoided altogether, lest their use cause confusion or arouse controversy. In particular, the description of individuals as homosexual may be offensive, partially because of the negative clinical association of the word stemming from its use in describing same-sex attraction as a pathological state before homosexuality was removed from the American Psychiatric Association's list of mental disorders in 1973. The Associated Press and New York Times style guides restrict usage of the terms.”[7]
For a detailed report on the reason and method behind the APA removing homosexuality from their list of mental disorders, see my article  “THE HOMOSEXUAL ACTIVIST, A CASE OF THE PATIENTS TAKING OVER THE HOSPITAL”.

As stated in the above quote, before 1973, homosexuality was recognized as a disorder, a pathological state, and it was only removed from that status after activist homosexuals used hostile tactics to harass members of the psychological associations and forced them to back away from that description. Note that it was not scientific research and study but physical force and threats that changed the professional organizations positions. That point is conveniently left out of the above quote by Wikipidia. And it is categorically denied by many homosexual activists. The truth is that homosexual activists rely heavily on the art of lying to promote their pro-homosexual agenda.

Wikipedia continued:
“Same-sex oriented people seldom apply such terms to themselves, and public officials and agencies often avoid them. For instance, the Safe Schools Coalition of Washington's Glossary for School Employees advises that gay is the "preferred synonym for homosexual", and goes on to suggest avoiding the term homosexual as it is "clinical, distancing, and archaic".[8]
More and more in our society this is becoming the standard approach to homosexuality, not because it is right, but because homosexuals have amassed a massive amount of political, economic and academic power and they are using that power to white-wash their image in the public arena. And they have employed a variety of crafty tactics to promote the pro-homosexuality agenda, including misinformation, misrepresentation, lying, intimidation, harassment and physical violence.
 
Don’t be fooled by their attempt at whitewashing the act of homosexuality. It is still as harmful and as sinful as it has ever been, and no amount of favorable packaging of homosexuality can make it good.
 
While there are many who understand the dangers and sinfulness of homosexuality, their warnings are basically banned from TV, Hollywood, most mass media press and major social media. But God’s word has plenty to say about it and we will be sharing that important information with you for you to learn in this lesson. But first, let’s deal with the origin of homosexuality.
 
THE ORIGIN OF HOMOSEXUALITY
 
Based on the biblical record of human history, it is clear that homosexuality was not a part of the original creation of God. Therefor it is important that we understand where homosexuality came from, since it is clearly now a significant part of human civilization.
 
First, it must be acknowledge that homosexuality has only become a “significant” part of human civilization within the last 10 or so years. And that “significance” is due not to the importance of or correctness of homosexuality, but rather to the efforts of homosexual activists and the failures of people who have been born of God and who serve Jesus Christ.
 
Please note that my use of the word “significant” is not to denote importance, but rather to denote the apparent popularity due to the efforts of the unsaved to “normalize” perversion. I have written about this phenomena in my article   “How America and many Christians have been conned by the homosexual activists community”
But the question must be asked, if homosexuality was not a part of the original creation, where did homosexuality come from? The answer is simple, homosexuality is just one of the many fallout effects of sin.

When Adam and Eve sinned against God in the Garden of Eden (Genesis 3), their perfect natures were corrupted, changed, and their ability to choose evil graduated to a propensity to do evil things. Eventually, homosexuality became one of those many evil things.

In Genesis 6:5,11-12  it says:
“And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. The earth also was corrupt before God, and the earth was filled with violence. And God looked upon the earth, and, behold, it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth.”

That depth of sin resulted in the universal FLOOD that destroyed the world that was. (Genesis 7)
After the repopulation of the earth with Noah’s family that emerged from the Ark, humans once again chose the path of rebellion against God. And the vast majority of the human cultures that developed, did so in ways that violated God’s will. Included in those violations in some of the cultures (not all) were horrible sins like murder, harsh slavery, incest, bestiality and homosexuality.
The Apostle Paul in his letter to the Romans states that homosexuality was an out working of the sinful nature of rebellious humanity. Romans 1:18-32.

Below are a few other comments by others who address the origin of homosexuality.

“….God’s original design has been marred and thrown out of whack as a result of human rebellion (see the narrative of mankind’s disobedience in Genesis 3). We understand that, because of “the fall,” every man, woman, and child on earth is “broken” in some respect or another, each in his or her own way. Homosexuals are not alone in this regard. Each and every one of us needs God’s healing grace. Each and every one of us needs a Savior.
The actual mechanics of the development of sexual orientation in the individual is, of course, another matter. As we see it, homosexual feelings and behavior are rooted in a wide array of overlapping and intertwining psychological (mental), physiological (physical), and developmental (life experiences) factors. (Emphasis mine)
It would probably be fair to say that no two people come to the point of identifying themselves as “gay” in precisely the same manner. A variety of environmental phenomena are involved, and there is a great deal of variance in the way these forces impact and shape the individual psyche. For this reason, it’s overly simplistic to assert that homosexuality is merely a “choice” or that people are simply “born that way.” The truth lies somewhere in between. And the important point is that, in one way or another, it can all be traced back to the “brokenness” or “fallenness” of mankind and the rest of creation.”[9]

This quote is from Focus on the Family-Where did Homosexuality come from”
In an article titled “MOSES AND THE ORIGIN OF HOMOSEX
UALITY”

From the advindicate.com 2014 it states:
“Human sexuality, along with a pleasing sexual imperative, is introduced at the very beginning of the Bible story. Mankind was created with gender. Gender was created with purpose.
So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.  28  And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it. Genesis 1:27-28
Compliantly, in the narrative, Adam “knew” his wife and she conceived a son, and then another, and then a third. And though we don’t have details about differing sexual orientations before the flood, it is certain that only heterosexuals were on the Ark.
And Noah went in, and his sons, and his wife, and his sons’ wives with him, into the ark, because of the waters of the flood. Genesis 7:7
Obviously the origin of same-sex attractions significantly predated its rise to the epic proportions apparent in Sodom four centuries later. However rare gay practice must have been at its beginning, we find men and boys (na’ar) from “every quarter” of Sodom involved in the assault on Lot’s home (in Genesis 19:4-9). [10]
How did homosexual practice originally come into existence? The Bible teaches that it rose as part of a judgment on those that invented idolatry…
Romans 1:21For although they knew God, they …23 exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and reptiles. 24  Therefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts to impurity, to the dishonoring of their bodies among themselves, 25  because they exchanged the truth about God for a lie and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever! Amen. 26  For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; 27  and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error. 28  And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a debased mind to do what ought not to be done. Romans 1:21-28, ESV”[11]

As you can see from the above two quotes, God does not leave us without clarity on the subject of homosexuality. Although homosexual activists desire to confuse the issue, the fact remains that homosexuality is a egregious sin and harmful to humanity.
 
WHY HOMOSEXUALITY IS WRONG, BAD AND DANGEROUS
 
Unfortunately, in our current society, although many are still aware of the dangers of homosexuality, and make the effort to get this information out to the public, there are many others who are determined to prevent the truth about homosexuality from being heard by the masses.  Those people at present are using all of their resources and power to prevent the truth about homosexuality from being shared with the public, and to present instead a false reality of what homosexuality is. This is why so little about what is wrong with homosexuality is available through public schools, psychological institutions and organizations, government agencies and even many universities.

There is no question that the source for the best information about the spiritual problem with homosexuality in all its forms comes directly from the Bible. But “honest”modern history and science has definitively established the justification for God’s prohibition, rejection and condemnation of homosexuality. They have established that homosexuality is not only a spiritual sin, but that it is also a natural crime against humanity.

1. It is anti-reproductive by nature. Only a male and a female can produce life. Two males and two females cannot reproduce life and thus homosexuality is by nature a life inhibitor, a reproductive dead end.
2. It is physically and medically harmful to the human body. This is clearly understood by the manner in which two male homosexuals engage in sexual activity. Their use of the male anus as a sexual entry point when it was created by God as a human waste exit point, not only demonstrates the irrational and perverted mind-set that male homosexuals suffer from, but also the harmful limits to which they will go to - too experience their sexual pleasure. The human waste that comes from the anus is extremely toxic and that section of the body is not made for penetration by the male sex organ. Doing so has resulted in all kinds of harmful medical conditions that male homosexuals and pro-homosexuals try to keep from the public and those they are trying to recruit to join that sinful life.
3. Female homosexuals called lesbians often use man made devices. They use fake man made replicas of male sex organs to simulate their desire to be the male in the homosexual relationship and perform a sexual act as if they were a male. The insanity of twistedness that homosexuals must practice to accomplish their rebellious sexual acts is never discussed in the public arena and the topic is avoided by them accept among themselves in private.
4. Homosexuality is psychologically harmful. The fact of homosexual’s unstable mental state has been well established in the medical fields. The required stress of living against ones natural status as a male or a female carries with it a litany of emotional, psychological and even physical stress baggage that very often results in the need for medication, psychological counseling and even suicide preventions. This is another aspect of homosexuality that is whitewashed and downplayed to the public. That is accept when they want to use it to their benefit, at which point they claim that it is our rejection of their homosexuality that is the cause of their stress and suicidal thoughts and attempts. This is a propaganda tactic that they use to shame us or make us feel sympathy for them, a game that they play well. But we should not be fooled by their efforts to gain our sympathy by blaming us for their instability. People are responsible for the choices they make and the life they chose to pursue.
   

GOD HAS THE FINAL WORD ON HOMOSEXUALITY

The bottom line is that no matter how homosexuals and their supporters try to clean up the appearance of homosexuality, it is God who decides, and He has made it clear that homosexuality is sinful and should not be engaged in by humans for any reason.

The following are the primary biblical text that address homosexuality.

The first time we are introduced to homosexuality (Sodomy) is in the book of Genesis chapter 19:4-13, here, Lot is a resident of that wicked city and when two angels in the form of men, came to visit him to inform him of God’s order for them to destroy the cities, before they could leave, the men and boys of Sodom surrounded Lots house and demanded that Lot bring the two men out so that they could have sex with them. The angels blinded the men and boys to prevent them from harming Lot, but that did not stop the homosexuals from continuing to try to find them. Verse 11 says that after being blinded the homosexuals “wearied themselves to find the door”. Not to get away, find safety, or even repent of their sinful desires, but to find the door. That is how determined they were to fulfill their lusts. Jude 1:7 in the New Testament makes reference to this event. Ezekiel 16: 49-50 also refers to this event referring to the men of Sodom as haughty and committers of abomination.

In Leviticus 18:22-25 God warns Israel not to practice the sins that the nations He was driving out were practicing. Among those sins was homosexuality. And God said because of their sins the land vomits them out. In fact, unlike today, back then under God’s theocratic government where He was their King, and during the times later when they lived under a Monarchy with earthly kings, the punishment for homosexuality was death. Leviticus 20:13.

Not only was sexual sins punishable by death under the Old Testament form of Government, but God also forbade cross-dressing.
“A woman shall not wear a man’s garment, nor shall a man put on a woman’s cloak, for whoever does these things is an abomination to the LORD your God.”(Deuteronomy 22:5)
This is how concerned God was about maintaining the visible and natural differences between the male and female.

In the New Testament, 1 Corinthians 6:9-11, the Apostle Paul warns the believers that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God, and homosexuality is one of the acts that unrighteous people did.

Indeed, God’s word on the subject of homosexuality is clear, and only those who seek to bypass God and His clearly stated word on the matter, will try to find a way to get around His clear teaching to justify practicing such an evil deed.
 


[1](http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_year_did_homosexual_become_a_word)

[2]From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

[3] The Word “homosexual” didn’t appear in English Bible until 1946 by Matt Slick

[4]From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

[5]From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[6]From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[7]From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[8]From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[9] Focus on the Family- where did Homosexuality come from
[10]MOSES AND THE ORIGIN OF HOMOSEXUALITY
https://advindicate.com/articles/2014/7/8/moses-and-the-origin-of-homosexuality

[11] ibid

 
A review by Danzil Monk Sr.
 
Note: I am a former member of the P.A.W.
I was saved and spiritually raised in a P.A.W. Church in the New York State & Ontario District Council, (as it was called back then).
I held several state offices including VP of the state Young people, Program Chairman of the State young People, state Brotherhood Secretary, the State Alter worker committee member, and was the recipient of the President’s president award of the state Young people.
When I moved away, I left in good standing and remained in contact with, and continued to teach and preach for my then pastor. In fact, I preached the last sermon my pastor heard, my daughter was the last child she blessed, and I was present when my pastor when on to her reward.
I also maintained a good name and reputation during my membership throughout New York State and beyond. I am still that person.
 
So I have no gripe or score to settle with the P.A.W.
I love and respect this great Christian organization.
 
The Panel session:
 
The Panel consisted of Dr. Jayne Morgan, Lillian Robertson, MD, Bishop R.E. Hairston Psy. D, and Presiding Bishop Theodor L. Brooks.
Dr. Jayne Morgan, M.D. who is the main speaker of this session, is Executive Director of the Covid Task Force and On-Air Medical Expert Kennesaw, Georgia, United States.
In other words, she is an official representative of the government and the medical community, and her allegiance clearly is with their agenda.
During his introduction, Bishop Brooks said that this session was to provide the viewers with information about what they should do. It was an effort to provide people with reliable answers.
 
Which means the information should be reliable, accurate, dependable, and honest.
 
At 17:14 Lillian Robertson said it would be an effort to get the right information out to counter the misinformation and disinformation.
Since that is their stated goal, that is what I will be gaging in my review.
 
At the 18-minute point Lillian Robertson asked Dr. Jayne Morgan, the apparent resident expert, “where are they in terms of the science”, the vaccinations, clinical trials etc. (18:15-27)
 
Dr. Jayne Morgan, (18:30) clearly a pro-Covid Vaccine advocate, talked about the supposed prior three- what she called “surges”, and said that the current surge is the only one that was preventable because we had the vaccines. This comment is clear evidence that she is drawing from the Vaccine makers, and the establishment who blindly follow them. She is relying on their playbook and not the universally established medical protocol that had been the standard for treating Covid viruses, and the basic protocol of doctor actions on behalf of their patients.
 
The fact is that the first serge was preventable. Had the medical professionals around the world did what they were trained to do, and what standard medical protocol called for, the covid spread could have been stopped. As explained by Dr. Peter McCullough, But instead, they allowed the WHO, the CDC and the FDA, and God knows who else, to dictate to them how to respond, and their instructions were to do nothing other than what these groups determined was appropriate. And these groups were motivated by money, not saving lives. This is clear from their promotion of a Covid vaccine which would profit them all, instead of applying the many known effective medicines, and sending out a constant call for use of vitamin C, D, Zinc and other nutritional aids to strengthen human immune systems.  
 
Since there were several courageous doctors who did follow the proper protocol and were able to save lives very early on, there was no need for the many lost lives, had the medical professionals not followed the bad commands coming down from the WHO, CDC and FDA telling them not to treat the covid sick with any treatments that were not approved by them. And their approved dangerous treatments like ventilators and remdesivir that were reported to have killed many of them. Dr. Morgan said nothing about any of this, and no doubt is unaware of it if she is relying on the CDC, FDA, major media, and big pharma for her information. That is why this kind of panel is useless if it does not include the other side being represented. It is not even balanced “science” if both sides cannot be heard.
 
Dr. Morgan hyped on the problem of some of the incoming patients being anti-science and anti-covid-“vaccine”, when they are in a hospital that is a monolith to science. She spoke as if there is only one perspective of the science concerning Covid and how to treat it. She called it a dichotomy.
 
She described this “fourth surge” as a surge of misinformation. She claimed the first three surges were spent trying to provide education and information and in this fourth surge we have to combat misinformation and disinformation. And it is discouraging and disquieting. (This should be remembered as we evaluate her presented information).
 
At 21:11 she continued by addressing the question of herd immunity. And she agreed that we could reach herd immunity without the vaccines, but not without unnecessary death and suffering.
 
I find it interesting that she would address natural herd immunity without addressing the fact that most deaths were due to poor health, and that an extremely large number of people were claimed to have died of covid because of the financial incentives given to hospitals to claim patients as covid patients, and that many were falsely claimed to have covid because of a bad PCR test that knowingly gave false positive results. As pointed out by Former Pfizer VP Dr. Mike Yeadon at the 11min. point of his video.
 
Additionally, there was no effort to gage how many people had and got past covid and did not need a vaccine or why? Because they want everyone to take the shot. Even if you have immunity.  The insane push for total vaccination is ignored by her and the rest of the panel. Why? What she was doing, is what the government, big pharma, social media and major media, and medical institutions and universities are doing. Preaching the covid vaccine is the only hope gospel. And ignoring the science that says otherwise.
 
I was curious if she would address the content of the vaccines, the trial tests in animals that were killed by the efforts to make a covid vaccine which they gave up on because they could not develop a safe one, but the sudden “success” of a safe Covid “vaccine” appears once governments were convinced to pour billions into the production of them, the horrible disinformation  about the safety of the covid shots, the actual number of people who died from covid and their prior medical conditions of morbidity that actually contributed to their deaths, the false reporting to cause fear and panic to get people to take the shot, etc. All promoted by the above mentions sources.
She said we have science to move us forward in a healthy manner, but again, she is one sided and clearly bias against any evidence to the contrary of her Covid vaccine view.
 
At 22:43 She slights the reports coming out of Israel saying that the vaccinated were more likely to be admitted to the hospitals than the naturally infected. She rejected it because she said it was not a research effort but an “observational study. It cannot be substantiated. But if substantiation of data is so important, why is she so willing to not only believe, but repeat unsubstantiated claims like the number of people who died of Covid, the claims that very few died or are made extremely sick from the covid shots, that there is nothing harmful in the covid shots, (when the total content is not available), that a combination of cheap known medicines cannot protect from or heal covid sick, etc. It is hypocrisy to say the least.
 
She says that only reproducible studies are useful and credible. If so, then why is she not paying attention to the reproducible studies that demonstrated the dangers of the covid vaccines? It shows that a extremely large number of people are getting sick and dying from the Covid shots (some 4 to 6 thousand to date and that is known to be extremely under reported), and not from alternative treatments. In the past, if 50 people got sick and died, the trial was stopped. Why is that not being observed now?
 
At 24:23 she said that the observational study, did not mention that the unvaccinated group that had natural immunity, had a section that died. But she stopped short of addressing why they died. No doubt they died because they were unhealthy and had other comorbidities. You see, so she also did not mention the full matter. And this is often the issue with their side. They strive very hard to keep any information from the public that will go against their efforts to Covid shoot everyone.
 
At 26:26 she addressed the VAERS  and says that it is a raw data bank, and that it alone cannot be trusted for accurate information on deaths, because anyone can report on it and it has to be what she calls “scrubbed”. But she never addresses who does the scrubbing and their allegiance. Many of the “Scrubbers” if they are establishment medical professionals who do the bidding of the CDC, FDA and pro-covid shot government, you can’t expect them to tell the truth or to honestly “scrub” the data. Additionally, she neglected to state just how much detail the VAERS system requires, which is why it is generally done by the patient’s physician or medical professional connected to the patient or case, which makes the raw reporting much more reliable than she falsely indicated. But she gave that false impression because she knew the bad things the VAERS system reports on the effects of the covid shots. Nor did she acknowledge that the law requires doctors to report their patient’s reactions to Vaccine shots on VAERS, but it is not being enforced.
 
At 28:24 she says we are fighting a pandemic of ideology and idolatry, claiming by inference that those of us who do not toe the line of their “YOU MUST TRUST THE COVID SHOTS” mantra, are unable to think rationally and to reason. This is insulting and sick. But it is necessary for them to say such things, putting us in the same category of those who actually-are incapable of rational reason. It solves all kinds of problems for them to do this. Namely, it allows them the illusion of having a justifiable reason not to meat us in the public square to openly debate the science and issues. Because to do so would force them to admit their lies or to have to either directly address issues they know they can’t if they want to maintain the deception or be seen clearly dodging rebuttals, avoiding questions, or look foolish as they repeat claims and accusations with no rebuttal to intelligent arguments and respected sources references.
 
Not one word was said by her acknowledging that there are many medical professionals who are on the other side of this issue and “science”. She intentionally gives the impression that true science and true medical professionals are on her side of this issue.
 
     
The P.A.W. presiding bishop Brooks, praised Dr. Morgan’s introduction with no objections, (he was a sheep to the slaughter).
He said the media was duping us into thinking a certain way. But he must not realize that the vast majority of major media is pumping his view not ours. So he was correct, only he was the one being duped.
 
At 30:41 Dr. Morgan replies again that she is not a fan to “do your own research” because most people are not capable of understanding what they read. They don’t have the education, credentials, or experience to do their own research. People can use scientific terms that sound official, but when a scientist reads them, the sentence is nonsensical. She said it is intentionally written to mislead people. It is a misuse of scientific language.
 
Sadly, her comment disrespects the many people who are in fact intelligent enough to either understand the material themselves, or to consult trusted medical and scientific professionals who they can ask to help with understanding the material.
 
For her to dismiss this group of people as if they are not relevant is just rude.
 
Additionally, she ignores the fact that there are many medical professionals on the other side of her perspectives and convictions about the Covid shots, who are reporting on the material and data, and doing so in a language that the laymen can understand. So much for her “I am not a fan of do your own research”.
 
At 31:19 Lillian Robertson, voiced her agreement by saying that the “idolatry” that Dr. Morgan earlier claimed was being practiced by anti-Covid vaxers, has led to the politicization of this pandemic.
 
This is strange, since it was the media, the government and the CDC, FDA, Big Pharma, and social media that created the politicization of this crisis. To blame it on ignorant people who worship ignorance and false information is not only wrong, but condescending and cruel.
 
She also marveled at the distrust of the hospitals by many people since the hospitals have always been the system that serves their medical needs in the past. But she seems to ignore the fact that medical malpractice and science fraud has also been long with us and well reported, even if under reported in the major media. So, to act as if they are white as their coats in purity is dishonest.  Given the mass malpractice of how they were told to handle Covid patients early on and the deaths that resulted, as pointed out by Dr. Peter McCullough and Dr. Mike Yeadon, there is good reason not to trust the hospitals.  So, Morgan and Robetson’s blatant disrespect for the ability of people to be able to think and make wise decisions about their medical treatment is striking.
 
Robertson then foolishly tried to compare it to our ignorance of the ingredients in Tylenol, insulin and blood pressure meds, yet we trust them.
 
Yes, but those have been used successfully for years and have been tried and proven safe, with no long-term side effects. The Covid shots are not the same thing.
 
She lied and said the same process used for those items were used for the Covid shots, and that is a bold face lie. The Covd “vaccines” were rushed through to acceptance via the emergency act.
 
Dr. Morgan at 33:31 came back with yet another attack on the people who she described as “anti-science” and “covid does not exist” (as in there is no virus at all) people, and attacked them as if we are all in that category, pointing out that when such people get sick, the medical professionals in the hospitals have to care for them at the risk of their own lives.
And worst, she claims that 95 percent of the sick of Covid in the hospitals are unvaccinated.
 
Where she draws her statistics from, and how she even knows that statistic is reliable, is not stated or addressed. Apparently in her mind, the verifiable data for the ACTUAL percentage of covid sick in the hospital is not important.
 
She continued by saying that such people expect doctors to live up to their Hippocratic oath, and they would do that.
 
But I would ask, isn’t that oath that you will do no harm? Is not insisting on the wrong treatment that does more damage than good, doing harm, and a violation of the oath?
 
She said that true believers in anti-science would not go to the hospital. And some on the panel laughed.
 
And Bishop Hairston said it was hypocrisy.
 
Note their condescending attitude, because people who do not trust the claims of the establishment, that the experimental Covid shots are safe, still go to the hospital when they are sick, that is hypocritical?
 
Since when is total trust in doctors necessary for going to the hospital?
Are they suggesting that there is no such thing as medical malpractice? And there is no cause for concern about how doctors treat patients? Really?
 
And still, none of them have addressed the intelligent, the medical professionals, and the scientists who are on the other side of this covid issue, and it is already 36 minutes into the session.
 
At 35:30 Bishop Brooks asked about mandated Covid shots for medical staff who do not want to take the covid shots. Now notice, these are not science deniers, or covid virus deniers. They do have the ability to research and to understand the information correctly. Let’s see how Dr. Morgan replies to them.
 
Lillian Robertson, first answered, saying it is disheartening to have to deal with that attitude when they are over worked and have to deal with that kind of rejection when there is a vaccine that can help.  She said - but they receive it when they are admitted into the hospital. If you don’t trust the science, why do you go to the hospital?
 
Clearly, she did not answer the question, and she is an intelligent medical professional who can understand. So, the Bishop asked her again about the coworkers at the hospital who do not want to take the shot. She said that their governor had mandated that they will have to if they want to work in a hospital. Again, no comment on their intelligence, or ability to understand the science, or their reasons for not wanting to take it.  And he did not press her on this, Why? She chose to focus on the problem of under staffing it will cause.
 
At 38:46 Dr. Morgan then commented that hospitals have a higher standard, to ensure a safe environment, you should not have to be concerned about catching a disease in the hospital.
 
We should be demonstrating science by our actions. Think about the patients who must worry about medical staff who are not vaccinated. We owe these people a safe environment. She says if you can’t practice science, maybe this isn’t for you.
 
The Presiding Bishop Brooks was again blown away by “the great” Dr. Morgan. He gave no objections or press for explanation as to why the medical staff would refuse the Covid shots.
Nor did he seem to catch the fact that even vaccinated people can give uninfected people Covid. So why are they not an issue? Could he be suffering from idolatry towards the Covid “Vaccine”?
 
He is the leader of a large Holiness Christian denomination that preaches and teaches against lying, deception and misleading people, and yet he swallows everything she said, hook line and sinker, without inquiring about the other side of the top brass medical professionals that disagree. He did not even have enough consideration to have them represented here.
 
What is not said, is that these medical staffers can understand the science and the research, and yet they have reservations about the shot.
 
What is also not addressed is that vaccinated staff can still catch and transmit covid to others, including patients. So why is the vaccine being pushed as a protection from Covid?  The science says that the covid vaccines do not prevent or protect from Covid. But they keep claiming that they give better protecting from covid then not being vaccinated. Because if you catch it, it will not be as bad. But who decides this?  On what actual evidence, and from who is this based on? The CDC?, the FDA? Both organizations are invested in the Covid Vaccines? Why should they be trusted to tell the truth about this?
 
At the 40:21 point Bishop Hairston turned the focus to safety precautions.
 
Dr. Morgan got into the issue of variants and as expected referenced the director of the CDC’s Rochelle P Walensky’s comments about the delta variant saying it was a “viral load that was one thousand, two hundred times higher than the previous variant”.
 
She made no effort to address how the director knew this for a fact, no mention of the research that determined it, or who the director was relying on to substantiate that claim. And she did not mention that there was research that stated that the delta variant while more contagious, was not as potent, or harmful as previous versions.  As reported by Dr. Chris Martenson. That is not important because it does not help the “all must be vaccinated the vaccine is our only hope” narrative.
 
And while she finally admits that the vaccines could not protect the vaccinated from spreading the delta variant, she leaves out entirely the underlining cause for the rise of such variants. Namely, the effort to make Vaccines the frontline defense rather than natural immunity and alternate medicine to protect and strengthen people from and with covid. She LEFT OUT THE FACT that natural immunity protects from variants when vaccines, if at all a protection, only protects against the virus it was created to fight.
 
She totally downplayed the power of natural immunity, and harped on vaccinations as the solution while admitting the weakening ability of the vaccines. Yet she claimed they still protected against serious covid sickness. But not once did she state what her evidence was for her “data”. She was repeating the mantra, as If she too was an idol worshiper of THE COVID VACCINE NECESSITY, and could see no other solution. 
 
She lied and said the unvaccinated are the threat because the variants are developing in the unvaccinated, not the vaccinated. (45:00-42) But Dr. Robert Malone, inventor of the mRNA vaccine technology, says that the more people you vaccinate, the greater number of vaccine mutations you are likely to get. He said the best policy is to only vaccinate the most vulnerable, this would limit the amount of mutations. (Washington Times audio Biden team’s misguided and deadly Covid -19 vaccine strategy). (4 minute point)
 
For those who prefer to read, this is what they said:

Dr. Robert Malone and Peter Navarro:
“The Biden administration’s strategy to universally vaccinate in the middle of the pandemic is bad science and badly needs a reboot.
This strategy will likely prolong the most dangerous phase of the worst pandemic since 1918 and almost assuredly cause more harm than good – even as it undermines faith in the entire public health system.

Four flawed assumptions drive the Biden strategy. The first is that universal vaccination can eradicate the virus and secure economic recovery by achieving herd immunity throughout the country (and the world).  However, the virus is now so deeply embedded in the world population that, unlike polio and smallpox, eradication is unachievable. SARS-CoV-2 and its myriad mutations will likely continually circulate, much like the common cold and influenza.”
 
“The most important reason why a universal vaccination strategy is imprudent tracks to the collective risk associated with how the virus responds when replicating in vaccinated individuals. Here, basic virology and evolutionary genetics tell us the goal of any virus is to infect and replicate in as many people as possible.  A virus can’t efficiently spread if, like with Ebola, it quickly kills its hosts.

The clear historical tendency for viruses crossing over from one species to another is to evolve in a way that makes them both more infectious and less pathogenic over time. However, a universal vaccination policy deployed in the middle of a pandemic can turn this normal Darwinian taming process into a dangerous vaccine arms race.

The essence of this arms race is this: The more people you vaccinate, the greater the number of vaccine-resistant mutations you are likely to get, the less durable the vaccines will become, ever more powerful vaccines will have to be developed, and individuals will be exposed to more and more risk.

Science tells us here that today’s vaccines, which use novel gene therapy technologies, generate powerful antigens that direct the immune system to attack specific components of the virus. Thus, when the virus infects a person with a “leaky” vaccination, the viral progeny will be selected to escape or resist the effects of the vaccine. 

If the entire population has been trained via a universal vaccination strategy to have the same basic immune response, then once a viral escape mutant is selected, it will rapidly spread through the entire population – whether vaccinated or not.

A far more optimal strategy is to vaccinate only the most vulnerable. This will limit the amount of vaccine-resistant mutations and thereby slow, if not halt, the current vaccine arms race.
Fortunately, those most vulnerable represent a relatively small number; and these cohorts have already achieved high levels of vaccine acceptance.  They include senior citizens, for whom the risk of serious disease or death increases exponentially with age, and those with significant comorbidities such as obesity, lung, and heart disease. 

For much of the rest of the population, there’s nothing to fear but fear of the virus itself.  This is particularly true if we have lawful outpatient access to a growing arsenal of scientifically proven prophylactics and therapeutics.

For example, there has been much controversy over ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. Yet, with the emergence of a growing body of scientific evidence, we can be assured these two medicines are safe and effective in prophylaxis and early treatment when administered under a physician’s supervision.  Numerous other useful treatments range from famotidine/celecoxib, fluvoxamine, and apixaban to various anti-inflammatory steroids, Vitamin D, and zinc.  

The broader goal when administering these agents is to moderate symptoms and take death off the table, particularly for the unvaccinated. Unlike vaccines, these agents are generally not dependent on specific viral properties or mutations but instead mitigate or treat the inflammatory symptoms of the disease itself.  (Pfizer is now actively marketing its own antiviral therapeutic – tacit admission Pfizer’s own vaccine is incapable of eradicating the virus.) 

We are not “anti-vax.”  One of us (Dr. Malone) invented the core mRNA technology being used by Pfizer and Moderna to produce their vaccines and has spent his entire professional career developing and advancing novel vaccine technologies, vaccines, and other medical countermeasures. The other (Mr. Navarro) played a key role at the Trump White House in jumpstarting Operation Warp Speed and ensuring timely delivery of the vaccines.  
 
We are simply saying that just because you have a big vaccine hammer, it is not necessarily wise to use it for every nail. The American people deserve better than a universal vaccination strategy under the flag of bad science and enforced through authoritarian measures.
• Dr. Robert Malone is the discoverer of in-vitro and in-vivo RNA transfection and the inventor of mRNA vaccines while he was at the Salk Institute in 1988.  Peter Navarro served in the Trump White House as the Defense Production Act Policy Coordinator.”
 
 
So, Dr. Morgan is incorrect when she says that vaccinating everyone is the answer, and that it is the unvaccinated that poses the great threat. It is the vaccinated that gives the virus the ability to mutate.
 
This is why Morgan and Robertson will not discuss those arguments of the “medical professionals” on the other side of the issue. To do so would expose the weakness of their high-sounding presentation.
 
She has so much to say about the science, but she either did not know or lied about the science to push her view. Yet she accused us of being the ones holding up progress. Sad.
 
Additionally, did you notice what Dr. Malone and Peter Navarro said about alternative treatments and vitamins? Is it not strange that Morgan and Robertson said nothing about these in their entire session?
 
She then claimed that the shut down for 90 days was recommended by scientists because it would have killed off the virus. That was not necessary since we had medicine that treated it and were misinformed not to use them, so that the Vaccines could be rushed through. Scientists did that too.
Their lies about the proper treatments for Covid is what caused the spread and the deaths. Yet she said nothing about this. She is indeed an idol worshiper of Covid vaccines, and blind to the plot.
 
The virus would have continued in people because total shut down was not possible in human society of billions. It is foolish to think it was a wise call.  We quarantine the Weak and sickly and old, not the healthy. You know this and yet you pretend that you are delivering the best science for this crisis.
 
She made light of our demand for freedom during the efforts to force a shut down and asked, “how free do we feel”, as if our unwillingness to be locked down is the reason for our current state. What disrespect for our intelligence?
 
Bishop Brooks was just elated and tickled by her “brilliance” and Lillian smiled from cheek to cheek, as Dr. Morgan pontificated and rattled off the Covid “Vaccine” is the only answer narrative.
 
Both bishops commended Dr. Morgan for her “preaching” and said they should give her a minister’s license.  Bishop Brooks said he would sign it.
 
How sad that these holy men of God, cannot discern when they are being lied to. It seems that they too worshiped at the altar of science that day, and were not interested in asking the hard questions.
 
She said that the data from all hospitals and medical places everywhere are reporting that the vast majority of covid sick are the unvaccinated.
 
But what hospital, getting lots more money for labeling an incoming patient “covid infected”, and seeking to maintain favor with those who fund them, would report that most on their covid patients were vaccinated, against the narrative of their financial backers? Why this is not considered as a valid issue, is frighteningly disturbing. 
 
At 49:20 Dr. Morgan said that Covid Vaccine hesitancy is not based on reason but an ideology.
 
That is disrespectful and condescending. This is the voice of medical arrogance. Notice that she includes medical professionals who are intelligent, and knowledgeable of the science and research in that “ideology not reason” group. Since she never does separate them.
 
She blamed the need for booster shots on the unvaccinated. Because the unvaccinated are the cause of the variants, totally ignoring the medical and scientific evidence that points to the vaccinated as the cause of the variants, as discussed above.
 
 She said that when talking to these people, there is not a response to rational data and rational information, who are at her talks not to get helpful information, but to disrupt.

This may be why she is so bent on painting all Covid shot rejecters with her wide brush.
She was agitated by hecklers. But as a professional, she should be more reliable and stable, not offended, vindictive and resentful because of it. 
 
I must insist that she refer me to the type of people that she has been talking to. I am not a PhD medical professional, and yet I have been able to talk to many RATIONAL people who referred me to RATIONAL INFORMATION. So, is she admitting that irrational unreasonable people are the only type she has been in contact with?
 
At the 50:50 minute point-She claim that those who make an idol of the "anti -Covid vaxx" view are worshiping those who share their view and should go to them for help. She claims she is a Christian and did not believe in worshiping idols, yet she seems to be guilty of what she so willingly accused us of. She seems to worship at the alter of the CDC, FDA, NIH, Fauci, Big Pharma, medical institutions, and government. And her failure to honestly, (if she is aware if the data) address the medical arguments on the other side by competent medical professionals, is unrighteous.
 
When asked if trusting science is idolatry, she said no. Why? Because science is not emotional. What?

She says that when she reads a science textbook, she does not come away with wonderful feelings. As if that determines that science cannot be worshipped. I know scientists who would strongly disagree with her. I have personally debated scientists who worshipped science and denied the existence of God.
 
She spent much of her time developing and addressing idea of a culture of anti-covid vaxx idolatry.
 
Embarrassingly, Bishop Brooks, who has been just giddy over all that Dr. Morgan has been saying, in a response to the question of science being worshipped, said that it was not worship, but trust in medical professions to treat medical issues like going to a dentist for a tooth issue. But he then said if you don’t want to take the covid vaccine, he was not going to criticize them, or put them down, you stay on your side and he will stay on his, a safe distance away from you. He said we need to stay in perspective and not go into left or tight field and amplify it and confuse the issue.
 
But Dr. Morgan, had just spent most of her time demonizing, judging and criticizing the unvaccinated as the main issue and cause of the Covid virus remaining a persistent problem.  I don’t think he realized what his words did to her stated narrative.
 
At 55:30 Bishop Hairston asked Dr. Morgan if it would be safe for the P.A.W. to have their conventions of 4 or 5 thousand people, and she said no. The surge is due to failure to follow safety procedure. She claimed that the safest events are those that have “vaccine mandates”.  Again, she is putting it all on vaccination. And here she backs the MANDATES. Nothing is said about human rights, the healthy being safe and how to build healthy immune systems, because she has fully brought into the pro-covid shot plot.
 
Bishop Brooks said he would follow the data on the out-break levels before deciding to have a convention on site. But he is relying on the same people who benefit financially from lying to the public and keeping the fear and crisis of Covid going.
 
To the question posted by a viewer that asked: “are we going to treat the unvaccinated like lepers, Bishop Brooks said no, but then rebuked the question as going off on the deep end, even though Dr. Morgan kept stressing the need for separating from the unvaccinated. It was an appropriate question, but it was not welcome because it forces them to address their irrational narrative. And that they did not want to do.
 
Dr. Morgan said we don’t treat them like lepers because unlike the lepers of the past, we have treatments. But she seems to forget that she pointed out that many people are not taking the “treatment” Covid shot, and so you are indeed advocating leper treatment. Earlier Bishop Brooks plainly said you stay on your side as an unvaccinated, and I will stay on my side safe as a vaccinated person. So why the hypocrisy?
 
Dr. Morgan recommended the questioner look at our hospitals and see how it is the unvaccinated who are there, being taken care of, not treated as lepers. That not only the unvaccinated covid sick are a problem, but they are a problem to those with other conditions who can’t get help and treatment because you non vaccinated are taking up the space.  She said but think a bout the fact that you had a choice to get the "vaccine" and did not. (Bishop Brooks clapped as she spoke).
 
Dr. Morgan knows that the viewer was not talking about the hospitals, but our day to day involvement with people. But to stay focused on the point would be to incriminating, so she shifted to the hospitals.
 
Well Dr. Morgan, My wife had Covid for three weeks badly, in our home and I was not wearing a mask nor did I constantly wash things or ware gloves. I remained in close proximity to her and often breathed her air. Yet I did not get “Covid”. And she fully recovered. But then, there was no one around to fabricate the facts in our case. And my experience is not going to help your agenda.
 
Dr. Morgan said she liked what June summers Harris said: “Remember, wisdom, knowledge and understanding are among the seven spirits God placed into the land”
 
Yet Dr. Morgan has ignored and or rejected wisdom, knowledge and understanding that are being given by the medical professionals on the other side.
 
Bishop Brooks emphasized mask waring, as if mask were really effective.
 
Dr. Morgan also backed “masking” but never said anything about the harm of masks. Because she rejects that view no doubt. Even though the “Science” clearly supports the danger of masks over long periods of time.  Common sense tells you that breathing in what you breath out is not health.
 
Nearing the end, Bishop Hairston asked Dr. Morgan about children vaccination. That children are dying of covid, is that true and she said yes. And it is sad.
 
But how does she even know if the rates are true? She said they make up about 25% of covid infected, but she never provided evidence. Nor did she address the fact of the many false positive of the PCR tests, or the exaggerated count being practiced by hospitals for money and or pleasing their financial backers.  
 
She said “children do well” but WE ARE BEGINNING TO SEE long term syndromes, they are showing long term risks of enduring issues down the road if we don’t protect them. The “long-term effect they are beginning to see in children”? (Never stating the research, data or source), but hitting us with the “don’t you care about our children tactic”. She gave no reference as to what medical status of those children were besides covid. Or what evidence there was to determine if Children with other medical issues were being called or listed as Covid issues. Remember, the money incentive is still in operation. A hospital still gets lots more money when a child enters and is listed as a Covid patient, then they do for other sicknesses. None of this is addressed. Why? It has a direct bearing on the issue, and they know this. But it would interfere with their efforts and so it is ignored. But it is irrational and unreasonable, to pretend these issues are not relevant to this subject.
 
The utter avoidance and denial of all the points that I have raised here that were not mentioned, important factors that medical professionals who were concerned about us being informed about the “science” and the whole truth, would have included. Could it be an indication that Dr. Morgan and Lillian Robertson could be suffering from a form of idolatry of “establishment worship”, that will not permit them to think outside the “Covid Shots to all agenda”?  

Could they be suffering from and inability to think rationally about what they are clearly avoiding and denying? You see, it can go both ways. If they are able to attribute to us, a psychosis of delusion, we can easily do the same for them. I think that we have more evidence to prove our case, than they do. Which is why they are not willing to have an open debate on these things. They prefer to pretend that there is no possibility of a nefarious agenda perpetrated by globalist. And that there are no other scientific or medical perspectives that are rational aside from theirs.
 
Not one time in this discussion was anything other than the Covid shots mentioned as a solution to Covid. Not even proper nutrition to strengthen our immune system. No discussion about, vitamin C, D, Zink, or Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine or anything. Why? Was it just an over site? Or could it be that they were so dedicated to their idolatrous worship of the Covid shots that they could not bring themselves to even mention any such alternatives?
 
Nothing was said about the blacklisting of known, tried, tested and proven medications that were blocked, banned, and denounced by the CDC, FDA and other medical and governmental authorities, in order to justify the emergency status of the Covid shot production and distribution. Nothing was said about the lack of transparency.
 
Bishop Brooks said he was blessed by Dr. Jayne Morgan’s presentation and he asked to fund her appearance at a P.A.W. event, Bishop Hairston agreed. It is a tragedy of ignorant trust that is abused by disinformation and misinformation.
 
This panel is a good example as to why so many Christians think the way they do about those who have chosen not to receive the Covid “vaccination”. The high level of disinformation coming from Christian leaders, who in turn are accusing us of being the ones that are spreading disinformation, is causing the division in the body.
 
I have labored through this session because of my concern that so many leaders are so carelessly willing to look like they are on top of the best information, but they are not willing to actually do the research outside of their closed in perspective.
Rather, they trust the “experts” to tell them what to believe.
 
This has never been the policy of the P.A.W. to my knowledge. In the past we were taught to study, investigate, and make sure before we adopted a doctrine. That was good advice then, and it still is now.
 
For those interested in getting the perspective of the other side of the Covid Issue. I recommend "thehighwire.com"
 
For medical help and information on how to treat and or prevent harm  from Covid.
https://frontlinemedicaldoctors.com/
 
For a great example of what happens when both sides are represented in the covid dialogue, watch this debate.

DEL BIGTREE’S HEATED DEBATE WITH TOP HEALTH OFFICIALS
ICAN CEO and host of The HighWire, Del Bigtree was invited on CGTN’s The Heat for a tense and, at times, explosive debate on Covid vaccination with two of America’s Top specialists, American Public Health Association Exec. Director, Georges C. Benjamin, and Chair & President of ACCESS Health Intl, William Haseltine. Del was joined in the debate by Undercover Epidemic Nurse author Erin Marie Olszewski. Source: https://www.cgtn.com/tv  Air date: Aug. 12, 2021

My biblical reasons for taking the time to address this matter. 

The Bible says:
​ "When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked bear rule, the people mourn." (Proverbs 29:2)
 
There seems to be more and more wicked people taking positions of ruler ship in our nation and the world. Globalist seems to have found the perfect vehicle in Covid to make their move on the world, and fulfill their goal to not only lower the world population, but also to fulfill their lust for control-power and greed.  It is possible that they are behind the mass disinformation about Covid. Some Medical professionals can’t see any other rational for the massive malpractice orders being uniformly promoted by the medical community, and the aggressive push to force the world to accept a rushed experimental and unsafe shot. A possible prelude to the mark of the beast system. Revelation 13
 
We as Christians are accountable for any false information we believe and help to spread.
When the Psalmist asked God who would dwell in His tent and live in His holy hill, the answer was:

"One who lives honestly, practices righteousness, and acknowledges the truth in his heart-who does not slander with his tongue, who does not harm his friend or discredit his neighbor"   (Psalms 15:1-3) HCSB

Proverbs 12:22 says: "Lying lips are abomination to the Lord: but they that deal truly are his delight." (KJV)
Proverbs 14:5 says: "A faithful witness will not lie: but a false witness will utter lies." (KJV)
Colossians 3:9 says: "lie not one to another." (KJV)
Ephesians 4:25 says: "Since you put away lying, speak the truth, each one to his neighbor" (HCSB)
1 Timothy 2:7
"Whereunto I am ordained a preacher, and an apostle, (I speak the truth in Christ, and lie not;"
1 John 2:21
"I have not written unto you because ye know not the truth, but because ye know it, and that no lie is of the truth."
Revelation 22:15
"For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loves and makes a lie."
And we certainly are not to lie for profit, like the ungodly, Titus 1:10-11. And our speech is to be sound so that no one can justly condemn us. Titus 2:8.

We are required to provide things honest in the sight of all people Romans 12:17, We are not to be false witness Romans 13:9.
​ 
Sadly for many professing Christians, none of these or any other mandates of Holy Scriptures that instruct us in how we are to conduct ourselves in this present world, seem to have any serious meaning. Be that as it may, God will have the last word.
 
We are instructed by God’s word to stand fast, (1 Corinthians 16:13 Philippians 1:27, 4:1, 1 Thess. 3:8), to live holy (1 Peter 1:15-16). And we must do it no matter how difficult things may get.  
 
I leave you with this final scripture verse, and pray that God will direct your heart.
 
Matthew 12:35-37
“A good man out of the good treasure of the heart brings forth good things: and an evil man out of the evil treasure brings forth evil things. But I say unto you, that every idle word that men (people) shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment. For by your words you will be justified, and by your words you will be condemned.”

Please feel free to leave a comment or correction. I honestly appreciate actual corrections as they help me to be more accurate and reliable in my reporting.

 THE PENTECOSTAL ASSEMBLIES OF THE WORLD COMMITTEE ON HEALTH EDUCATION & WELNESS-EXPERT PANEL SESSION September 25, 2021

 
In the words of the Psalmist- “..I am fearfully and wonderfully made..” (Psalms 139:14).
 
Of all of God’s great creation humanity seems to be clearly set forth as his most cherished possession. It is this fact that prompted David to say:
 
“When I consider thy heavens, the work of thy fingers, the moon and the stars, which you have ordained; what is man that you are mindful of him? And the son of man, that you visit him?
(Psalms 8:3-4).
 
The answer to this question is easily found in Genesis 1:27.
“So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them”.
 
As such, God placed man over the earth that He created and gave him dominion over all it’s inhabitants, His divine plan being to create a race of people after His likeness, holy and without blame before Him in love, that they should be to the praise of His glory.
(Ephesians 1:4,12).
 
This He purposed in Himself, “before the foundation of the world”. (Ephesians 1:9,4).
 
For, “Known unto God are all His works from the beginning of the world”. (Acts 15:18).
 
However, some time after the creation the first humans, after God had blessed them and established them in the earth, they rebelled against God, and in doing so gave Satan dominion in the earth. Sin and death entered the world and humanity’s problems began to over take them.

Sin became a part of their very nature. No longer were they the innocent creatures that they were when they came from the hands of their creator. No longer could they enjoy the peace and tranquility they once enjoyed when they walked in harmony with their God. Now they have been changed and their authority has been transferred to the one who masterminded there down fall.
 
SATAN
Satan, who was once named  Shining one (he-lel), In the KJV Lucifer (Latin), rebelled against God some time before the creation of man. (Isaiah 14, Ezekiel 28).
And he now uses the authority he gained from Adam, to exploit humanity in his fiendish plot to deify himself in the eyes of humanity and reign on earth as our king.
(Isaiah 14:13-14, Daniel 11:36).
 
HIS SUCCESS 
In the process he has warped the minds and hearts of the people so that some will not discern between good and evil, while others choose to live by humanistic ethics that are far from godliness. He has laid complex traps for us that bind us in mental and emotional confusion to keep us from finding the way of peace. 2 Corinthians 4:3-4, Romans 3:17).  He has fed our minds with perverted concepts and morals to steer us away from truth and righteousness. Through his deception he has blinded the masses of humanity, and lead us in the path of covetousness and immorality. (Romans 1:29-31).
 
THE FOREKNOWLEDGE OF GOD 
Fortunately God is omniscient and knows all things, neither is there any creature that is not manifest in his sight: but all things are naked and open unto the eyes of Him with whom we have to do. (Isaiah 46:10, Hebrews 4:13). Therefore, knowing that humanity would sin against Him and be over taken by sin, God had already provided the mean for our redemption through Jesus Christ. We are told in Revelation 13:8 that Jesus was the lamb that was slain from the foundation of the world and that His blood was shed before the foundation of the world. In gospel of John 1:29 we are told that He was the lamb that takes away the sins of the world.
 
THE BIBLE 
How God would accomplish the redemption of humanity and deliver us from the bondage of sin and the influence of Satan, and indeed how He has accomplished the redemption for us through the shed blood of Jesus Christ, is recorded in detail in the pages of God’s word the Bible. It is the book of the generations of Adam (Genesis 4:1).
It is the book of the generations of the heavens and the earth.(Genesis 2:4).
It is the truth and it is the light. (St. John 17:17, Psalm 119:105). And through it God reveals to us the cause of our turmoil’s and their solution.
 
THE IMPORTANCE OF HEARING THE WORD 
The Bible is indeed the word of God, and although there have been countless attempts to disprove its validity and destroy its influence; it still remains authoritative and reliable.
Millions today still testify of its life-changing message.
There are however millions more who have never taken the time to hear it’s message.
 
God has tried in vain to persuade them to listen to His offer of salvation. Because He has chosen not to violate there will in this matter, they have exercised their right not to listen, and in doing so, robbed themselves of the opportunity to be saved.
 
Faith can only come by hearing (or reading) the word of God. (Romans 1:17). Believing in Jesus is essential for salvation, and you cannot believe in Him if you have not heard of Him.
(Romans 10:14).
 
God has commissioned His Spirit filled, water baptized, blood washed servants to preach the gospel of salvation throughout the whole world to every creature, and this work is being carried out today. (Mark 16:15). 

The question is, are you listening?  Are you going to the place where God’s word can be heard?  If so, are you listening carefully in order to understand so that you might become a partaker of God’s gift of salvation?

Jesus said in Mark 4:24 “Take heed what you hear…unto you that hear, shall more be given”.  Hebrews 2:1 tell us that we “ought to give the more earnest heed to the things that we have heard, lest at any time we should let them slip”.
 
Jesus also exposed Satan’s desire to keep us from hearing and obeying God’s word. (Luke 8: 2).
 
The book of Acts reveals to us that Satan uses people who follow him to hinder the preaching of the gospel. (Acts 13:6-12, 14:1-7).
 
Therefore the choice is yours. You can neglect to hear God’s word, and reject it’s message, excepting the consequences that will be the result, (Acts 13:45-46, 14:1-7, St. John 8:24, Rev.20:11-15), or you can find a church where God’s word is being preached and taught, where you can learn the truth that can set you free. (John 8:31-32).
 
If you have searched but you can not find a church that teaches the whole gospel, where you can worship God and learn of Him, (Matthews 11:29), We invite you to (as Joshua said),
“Come hither, and hear the word of the lord your God”.  (Joshua 3:9).
 
If you are interested in escaping the soon coming wrath that will be unleashed on this sin infested world, (2 Peter 3:3-12), please contact us , and we will tell you words whereby you and your family can be saved. (Acts 11:13-14).
 
Please don’t delay. Tomorrow is not promised to you. (Proverbs 27:1).
Today if you hear His voice, harden not your heart. (Hebrews 4:7).
Seek ye the Lord while He may be found, (Isaiah 55:6).
 
This message is a product of God’s love. Please tell someone else about it.
 
 

 [UU1]AFJM P.O. box 7332 Freeport, NY 11520
email: afjmdm@yahoo.com

​In this article, I will be using the label “LEFT”. I am not unaware of the limits of labels, I know full well that they not only have their limits, but can and are often abused and misused. But in spite of that, they also serve as a useful purpose when used properly and accurately. I will endeavor to use “LEFT” and “LEFTIST” fairly and accurately, not as a slap to those who hold leftists views, but as a tool of identity and reference of those who hold and promote clearly leftist views that are unrighteous and wrong. My concern is that too many who claim to be on the right (whatever that is these days), or who claim to be conservative, (whatever that is these days), and those who profess to be Christians, are often guilty of thinking like those who are on the "Left".

And before you attempt to educate me about how un-Christian using labels is, please read your Bible again.
Jesus called Herod a “Fox” (Luke 13:32), He called the Scribes and Pharisees "hypocrites".
(Matthew 23:13-29) And He also called them "serpents" and "vipers" (Matthew 23:33).

In Paul’s letter to Titus, he quotes a prophet of the Cretans and he repeats their accusation about their character, acknowledging that they are “liars”. And Paul says that it was a true analysis of them (Titus 1:12-13). I could say more but I think this is sufficient.

Influence and Manipulation

Billions of dollars are spent every year in the advertising industry to not only learn how to best influence the public, but also to then execute those influences in order to sell their products to us or get us to think a certain way about something or someone.

Sometimes these influence tactics are executed with extremely subtle methods, and other times, they are boldly stated or revealed to those they are designed to manipulate.

Yes, I said manipulate. Manipulation is a basic part of human existence, and yet it still stirs offence whenever it is suggested to someone that they have been MANIPULATED.

I would have to guess that pride is somewhere at the foundation of the cause. But how many of us would admit that we are too proud to admit that we are or were influenced to the point of manipulation by someone or something at one time or another? For some reason, many people are reluctant to acknowledge that they are or have been influenced in this manner.

It has been my experience that that reluctance is often the root cause of such influences maintaining their power over the individual. It seems that being able to say that “no one tells me what to do or think, I think for myself”, give people a since of self-pride. And anyone that says otherwise about them, are quickly viewed as offensive, and sometime even enemies.
Why, because they intuitively realize that to admit that they have been influenced, does indeed indicate that they do not fully “think for themselves”, and they foolishly see this as a form of weakness, a form of diminished character?

But the truth is that there is nothing wrong with being influenced in and of itself. Influence is a common human experience. Everyone is influenced in one way or another by someone, or something. We are influenced by our parents and other family members, we are influenced by teachers and our significant others or spouse, we are influenced by our friends, and even our children, we are influenced by what we read in books, and by what we see on TV and hear on the Radio, and by movies. Even our Christian faith is all about influence by God and overcoming the influence of sin and Satan.
 
So why is it that as soon as those of us who recognize the LEFTs rhetoric, propaganda and disinformation in those we are communicating with, and we point this out to them, they generally become offended and insist that they are not influenced by the LEFT, but they think for themselves?
 
I find it strange that they are so bold and willing to defend the LEFT and their policies, but they are not so willing to acknowledge that they have been influenced by them. If the LEFT is so wonderful in their view, then why the denial of being influenced by them?
 
While some form of Pride is clearly involved, I can’t help but wonder if an unwillingness to take responsibility for their convictions and actions on behalf of the LEFT, is also a part of that Pride.
 
Most all on the LEFT that I have encountered and dialogued with, have been fast on support for their LEFTIST VIEWS, but slow on actually defending them. The vast majority of what I get from them is accusations and repeated accusations, with little or no defense of the accusations. Even after I refute their accusations, I get a repeat of the accusation, rather than a rebuttal of my refutation. This reveals a serious condition.

Dishonesty

I have tried in vain to get those on the left that I have dialogued with, to stay focused on the arguments that I present against the left, and to then just provide a credible refutation of my arguments to prove that I am incorrect, this way I too can grow and learn. But as I said, I have rarely received that from them. Instead, I have been accused of being ignorant, a Political slave, blind, and other expletives, all while receiving no intelligent rebuttals to my arguments and evidences. This to me is blatant dishonesty, and evidence of insincerity. Perhaps a few examples are in order here:

I will exclude the names since it is not my intention to “put the culprits on blast as they say”.

Last year there was an accusation against President Donald Trump that went viral that claimed that he said that he had done more for Christians than Jesus did. A young student of mine contacted me and asked me to look into this accusation, and she gave me the Facebook (FB) link to a Christian Bishop that had posted this accusation against Trump. When I looked at the Facebook page I noticed that I knew the Bishop personally, and so it concerned me even more. So I searched for evidence and found out that the accusation was not true, it originated from a Satire site called The Babylon Bee. And was a satire, not a true statement. As confirmed by snopes.com.

What was sad, is that when the Bishop posted the lie, his Christian friends went off on the President and called him names and said bad things about him and his mental state. But when I posted the evidence that it was not true on the page and asked for a retraction from the Bishop and the other Christians, I got nothing but silence. Now it is possible that the Bishop just was to busy to monitor his Facebook page, but he was still accountable for what he posted, just as everyone else who commented unrighteously. 

When a dear sister that I taught the Bible to years ago, recently expressed surprise that I was a supporter of Trump and not Biden or the Dems, and then called Trump a racist and sower of discord, and sited Trumps claim that he did more for Christians than Jesus, as proof of his unfitness to be President, I provided the above evidence to her that the claim was not true.
But instead of acknowledging her wrong, she actually continued repeating it and insisting that it was still true. She even said that she actually heard Trump say it on a video. I asked her or anyone to provide it for me, and I would retract my defense on that matter. I then asked if she agreed that if it was not true, that she should apologize for repeating it in the light of our Christian obligation not to lie and to repent when we are wrong? I got no answer. Again, it could just be that she did not regularly monitor her Facebook posts, but she should have.

To her credit, she did later concede that she should be more careful. But most others never acknowledged doing wrong. 

It seems that such people are forgetting the standards that God has obligated us as Christians to live by, and what is required of us to be His representatives.
When the Psalmist asked God who would dwell in His tent and live in His holy hill, the answer was:

​"One who lives honestly, practices righteousness, and acknowledges the truth in his heart-who does not slander with his tongue, who does not harm his friend or discredit his neighbor"   (Psalms 15:1-3) HCSB

Proverbs 12:22 says: "Lying lips are abomination to the Lord: but they that deal truly are his delight." (KJV)
Proverbs 14:5 says: "A faithful witness will not lie: but a false witness will utter lies." (KJV)
Colossians 3:9 says: "lie not one to another." (KJV)
Ephesians 4:25 says: "Since you put away lying, speak the truth, each one to his neighbor" (HCSB)

Insincerity  

When I see this kind of reaction or non-reaction from those who are Christians, it greatly concerns me, because it gives the impression of insincerity. I know that such an accusation is offensive to those who it is directed at, but in fairness, it does seem to apply. And if not, it is on the one who is acting inappropriately to explain why they are not being insincere by their refusal to acknowledge a clear wrong they have done. When a person is sincere, they acknowledge wrong when they do it.  We are told in James 5 to "Confess your faults one to another" (James 5:16) KJV
But in order to confess it, we must first acknowledge it. 
(Hosea 5:15, Jeremiah 3:13,14:20, Psalms 32:5)

And we must be willing to forsake it: In Proverbs 28:13 it says:
“He that covers his sins shall not prosper: but whoso confesses and forsakes them shall have mercy.”

Ignorance

Granted, ignorance can clearly be a part of the cause of such a commitment to leftist ideas, but ignorance is hardly an excuse for their behavior. Whether on the left or right, we are all accountable for acknowledging our wrong and our errors. Additionally, our ignorance does not justify our perpetuating lies and false representations. We are still accountable to God.

Habit
​
What seems to be happening is that many Christians are locked in the habit of watching Leftist dominated News media, and Leftist dramas, and leftist talk shows and leftist sitcoms, etc., often not knowing or caring that they are being influenced by leftist ideas. And the influence of that exposure is so strong and effective that they don’t even realize it. Humans are creatures of habit, and it is easy to fall into habits. Therefore we must be aware enough to choose good habits rather than being drawn into bad ones.

Obsessiveness

Sadly, such viewing habits can and often does morph into an obsession. And such obsessiveness often makes the one affected defensive about their obsession. So that when it is pointed out to them, they are offended and even deny it. Much like alcoholics deny they are alcoholics and drug addicts deny they are hooked on drugs.

Those who are hooked on wrong thinking tend to deny they are, while giving no justification for maintaining it. Perhaps they have found comfort in the feeling of being in agreement with popular media, Hollywood, Public education, (higher and lower), and the Democrat “progressives”. And they dread the necessity of reeducating themselves if they acknowledge their error.

Yet we have the witness of the Thomas Sowell’s, the Candace Owens, and even homosexual David Rubin’s, and so many more who have seen the light and crossed over from the dark side of the Left.

News Media

I try to warn people to be careful and responsible viewers of news, because nearly all have ceased from being honest informers, and have become agenda driven, partisan, and narrative creating sources. As a result, it has become necessary for all to become good inspectors and to carefully examine the sources that they tap for their information to determine if it is indeed credible.  

With so many false claims and vast misinformation campaigns being perpetrated on the public by politicians, Big Tech, Hollywood, TV and Cable networks, government officials, medical and education institutions, the Church must step up and rise to the occasion and meet that misinformation or disinformation campaign with truth.

Honesty and Humility

Christians must be honest and humble about their worldviews and their politics. What I am often exposed to on social media, are Christians who refuse to be honest or humble about their Leftists views. They either deny they are LEFT, or they deny that their left views are wrong or bad.  And as I said, what is worse is that this denial is rarely coupled with intelligent rebuttals of my arguments against their views. For them, it seems that merely denying my arguments and rejecting my evidence is sufficient to justify their convictions. And if I refuse to agree with them, and present rational proof, it is because I am not woke, I am a racist, still on the plantation, or crazy.  This is what I am being confronted with more often than I should. And sadly, it is often by Christians.

It makes me wonder just how much “influence” their churches and pastors have on them, if it is so easy for them to be so unreasonable and dishonest. Or could it be that their church and pastors are controlled by leftists thinking themselves, and have too much control over them. Whatever the reason, the influence of the left on Christians is a serious matter. Because it strikes at the heart of what true Christianity is all about.

The Bible and Leftists policies and tactics.

Any Christian worth their profession of living for and being dedicated to Jesus Christ and God’s word would be able to see where the left goes against biblical mandates and doctrine. Please note, I did not say they were not saved or that they were not Christians. I have to make this disclaimer because one common tactic of the left is to misrepresent what we say in order to distract from the real issue, to discredit us or to defame us. And sadly that tactic works all too often.

God’s word, speaks against murder, and the Left is for Abortion.
God’s word speaks against deception and misrepresentation and disinformation, and yet the left thrives on them.
God’s word speaks against homosexuality, and the Left supports and defends it.
God’s word speaks against Atheism, and the Left seems to be dominated by them,
God’s word speaks against Darwinian Evolution, yet the left promotes it.
God’s word speaks against Gender confusion, yet the left promotes and accommodates it.
God’s word speaks against bearing false witness against others, but the left thrives on this.
I could go on but I think you get the point.

Pastors who seek to demonstrate their allegiance to God over their political affiliation, should and must include in their teaching, the necessity of those who say they are Christians to be honest, holy and righteous in their words and actions. This should also be enforced by the church if members are to hold office as ministers and leaders.

If the teaching is efficient, their members should be well prepared and capable of not only defending the truth of God’s word, but incorporating that truth into their political and cultural conversations with those who prefer to live by their emotions.

It is refreshing to encounter Christians who actually get it, and understand the games of the left, but I am seeing far too many who have been deeply influenced by their TVs, Hollywood and education, and who are unwilling to admit it or even acknowledge the possibility. This concerns me.
​
I have seen White pastors like John Pavlovitz attack the entire White evangelical church as racist, with no effort to be balanced or honest. Apparently, just to show how woke he is, and gain favor with the left, yet also apparently not caring about being honest. Christians should not be following such people.

I pray that true Christians will continue to take a stand against compromise, and not loose faith or hope in the face of growing fascism and the rise of leftists power.
​
We are instructed by God’s word to stand fast, (1 Corinthians 16:13 Philippians 1:27, 4:1, 1 Thess. 3:8), to live holy (1 Peter 1:15-16). And we must do it no matter how difficult things may get, because in the end God will have the last word, and we are on God’s side. 

The Tom Porter article is a good example of how the media deceives the public.
​
By Danzil Monk Sr.

The article title is:
“How a New York billionaire-funded anti-vax group is contributing to the vaccine hesitancy that's crippling the US recovery” published on August 24, 2021.

If you have not watched the video interview that Tom Porter did with Del Bigtree, you must do so if you are going to read my review here. That is the only way you will have context and understand what I am reporting here.
 
In that interview you will notice that Tom Porter was kind and professional with Del, and he gave the impression that he was interested in getting at the truth. Through out the interview his demeaner was one of and interest in being informed, fair and balanced in his preparation and publishing of his article.
 
But as you will see here from the article that Tom Porter published, it was anything but all true, fair and balanced.
 
The very title of the article makes it clear that this is a hit piece on not only Del Bigtree and ICAN, but on one of his alleged financial backers or supporters.
 
The interview was published on The High Wire on August 17, 2021 and Tom’s article appeared on the Insider website on August 24, 2021.
 
It starts off with these three bold letter captions:

• The Informed Consent Action Network is one of the most influential anti-vax groups in the world.
• The group has brokered ties with far-right Trump supporters in recent months.
• It's bankrolled by the New York philanthropist and billionaire Bernard Selz.

Again, you can see from these captions that this is not going to be a fair report. And you should know that the reasons for these captions and the even bolder, bigger title caption, is due to the fact that reporters know that most people do not read entire articles, they get their information by glancing the headlines, and bold captions. And even if they do read most of the article, what they remember most are the big captions. So it is a tactic to put thoughts in the minds of the readers.
Often the captions are what is known as virtual signals, they tell their base what they are trying to get out to the public.

What is strange about the first caption, is that later in the article, Tom Porter clearly contradicts it by his use of the words “most influential” to describe Del's group, which says the opposite of the caption, there he uses the word "obscure". But this is only evidence that such reporters are not interested in being consistent, but only in getting the message of "anti-vaxxers" must be rejected out.

The second caption is their typical regurgitation of "TRUMP IS THE ENEMY AND ANYONE WHO SUPPORTS HIM" message. Even though he is no longer president, they must keep that mantra going, because in their minds it seems, it keeps the publics focus on blaming Trump for everything that goes wrong. So that if they cannot get people to believe that Trump is the blame for everything, at lease he can be blamed for most things. Particularly, things that are actually not his fault.

And since they have used so much of their resources and money to falsely make Trump the Boogie Man, and everyone who supports him, evil, they continue to use that successful stigma to plaster on anyone who is conservative and does not agree with them.  Note how many times Trump’s name appears in his article.

The third caption is an effort to target Del’s financial supporters. It is a virtual signal for the left to go after Del’s financial backers and hit him in his money. It is sick, but that is how the left roles.

The article continues:

As part of his bid to encourage Fox News viewers to question the safety of COVID-19 vaccines, Tucker Carlson in June praised the work of an obscure campaign group named the Informed Action Consent Network, or ICAN.

This is a clear contradiction from the title and the first mini caption. Both of which make it clear that Del and his ICAN are a significant courter force to the Pro-vaccine agenda. Yet here Tom says they are “obscure”.

The article continues:

Carlson described ICAN as "a group that advocates for transparency on vaccines," citing emails it had obtained to attack White House medical chief Dr. Anthony Fauci, a popular hate figure for the far right. 

Note the words “a popular hate figure for the right”. That is a signal of support for Dr. Anthony Fauci. You see, he seems to want you to think that it is only the “right” who hates lying Dr. Anthony Fauci. As far as Tom is concerned, Fauci can do no wrong, if the “right” hates him, the "left" must love him. But that is not the case, as many on the "left" have openly expressed concerns about Fauci’s comments and his efforts to cover up his involvement in the wuhan Covid virus scandal. Also, Fauci’s constant flipflopping  has cost him the trust of many, not just those on the “right”.

The article continues:
 
ICAN is seen by many as a more extreme — and dangerous — organization that Carlson's description let on. 

So  he claims that Carlson, a conservative, is being dishonest about the danger of Del and the ICAN because they are, “seen by many”, as extreme and dangerous? But many others, including me, see them as an important source of reliable information. But to Tom that is irrelevant because that is not the message he wants to promote. You should pay careful attention to just how much evidence Tom provides here of that "Danger" and "extreme" coming from Del,(None).

The article continues:

It was one of the figures on the so-called "disinformation dozen" list cited by President Joe Biden's administration as the main sources for anti-vaccination disinformation online, which Biden has called on Big Tech to combat.

Now this is important, because he will not define what “disinformation” is, or how what Del is reporting is "disinformation”. Nor will he as a reporter bother to evaluate the Biden Administration’s claims about the "dozen" to see if they are credible.  Because none of that is important to him.

The article continues:

ICAN is particularly notable, experts say, because it has actively courted conservatives and supporters of former President Donald Trump, whom multiple studies have shown to be the most reluctant to trust the shot.

In this paragraph Tom claims that it is Trump supporters who are the most reluctant to trust the shot. But this false claim flies in the face of the media’s admission that highly intelligent people are among the most shot resistant.

This US News report says the uneducated “decreased” in hesitancy while the most hesitant were the most educated.

“In terms of education levels, people with a high school education or less had the largest decrease in vaccine hesitancy during the study period, while hesitancy held constant among those with a PhD, which was the most hesitant group by May.”

The UNHEARD the post, reported that it is the most educated who will resist the jab.

“What’s more, the paper found that in the first five months of 2021, the largest decrease in hesitancy was among the least educated — those with a high school education or less. Meanwhile, hesitancy held constant in the most educated group; by May, those with Ph.Ds were the most hesitant group. 
So not only are the most educated people most skeptical of taking the Covid vaccine, they are also the least likely the change their minds about it…” 
 
But we also know that you can get any result that you want just by how you decide to do your research. As this report shows that educated people are most likely to take and trust the Covid “vaccine”. But it is a university study, and universities are funded by the government and generally will not buck against the governments Covid agenda.

It is interesting that Tom Porter did not think that any of this was important to mention, he only presented one side. Why, because the goal is to make Trump and his supporters seem like the problem, even though he is not the current President.

The article continues:

Since being founded three years ago, the group has waged a media, legal, and online campaign to hammer home the theory that the damage caused by vaccines is being systematically suppressed. 

​Here Tom repeats the lie that vaccine dangers and the suppressing of that fact is just a “theory”. He has clearly not bothered to research this before he published, because he is not interested in facts, just their pro-Covid “vaccine” narrative.

The dangers of Covid “vaccines” have been well documented and reported by Del Bigtree and others. Which is the real reason they are being targeted as disinformation spreaders. That's how corrupt media, big pharma and government silences their opposition.

Daystar, a Christian ministry has a whole video page dedicated to exposing the dangers of vaccines and the corruption in the medical industry and government. And the systematic suppression of the dangers of the Covid “vaccines”, and all the other medical malpractice being promoted by the Pro-Covid “vaccine” side, has also been well documented. Just turn on just about any news program, and you will be plastered with claims that anti-Covid "vaxx" is evils, and constantly assured that the Covid “Vaccines” are safe and effective. In fact, they are so sure of it that they have to bribe people by offering money, free sports event tickets, free food, free trips, and yes, even free lap dances for desperate men.
 
The article continues:

The group is based in Texas, a hub for libertarian right-wing causes, and the campaign is — per a Washington Post investigation — largely bankrolled by the New York financier Bernard Selz and his wife, Lisa. 

This is a signal from Tom to his leftist activists to go after the people who are providing financial support to Del and ICAN. As I said, Tom Porter no doubt got instructions by his paper to go after Del and his financial backers. Since he clearly is not trying to provide an honest report, a hit piece is the only other purpose for this article. That seems clear, especially after listening to the interview he did with Del. Also note that Tom injects that ICAN is based in a hub of “right-wing causes”. He never makes such references when he mentions people or institutions that are on the "left". Why?

The article continues with another bold caption claiming vaccine hesitancy is harming thousands:
​
Vaccine hesitancy is killing thousands, and impacting US economic recovery

This is a bold face lie (pun intended), since it has been well reported that the Covid “Vaccine” does not prevent or protect from Covid, how can people that are not vaccinated be blamed for those who die of covid? People who have been “vaccinated” are still dying of Covid, and spreading Covid. Additionally, non-vaccination can’t possibly be the blame for the economic disaster that exists, since it was bad political decisions to foolishly and unnecessarily shut down our cities that caused the problem. But Tom will not address any of this because he is not interested in honest reporting, only in blaming the unvaccinated for all the Covid problems and pushing the pro-Covid “vaccine” agenda.

Notice his next paragraph:

The Delta coronavirus variant continues to spread in the US, causing serious illness almost exclusively in those who have not accepted a vaccine. The continuing spread of the disease also imperils US economic recovery.

With little effort, anyone can do their own research and find that people who have been “vaccinated” are mostly those who are getting sick and dying of Covid. But Tom does not even mention that there are countering reports that show conclusively that people who have been vaccinated are dying at high rates, and many are experiencing serious sickness. Why? Nor is he interested in the fact that it has been established that the Delta variant is not as dangerous as the previous versions. But like those seeking to use Covid to scare the public into taking the Covid “vaccines”, they are claiming that every variant including the Delta, are extremely dangerous. But this is only true for people who are unhealthy or sickly. But those who trusts them are not concerned about their dishonesty.

The article continues by Quoting Imran Ahmed:

Imran Ahmed is the CEO of the Center for Countering Digital Hate, the UK-based charity that compiled the "disinformation dozen" list cited by the Biden administration.  He told Insider that ICAN and its CEO, Del Bigtree, were among the top anti-vaccination influencers on the list.

Notice that Tom did not tell us if Imran was a leftist or if the Center for Countering digital Hate was a hub of leftists causes. Why? But he saw the need to refer ICAN’s location as the hub of Libertarian Right-Wing causes. You see, his goal is not to openly tell you that he and his leftist friends are pursuing their own agenda, which is to make conservatives look like the enemy and the problem with our society, so that you will not bother to focus to closely on what the leftist are doing.

He continues the quote of Imran Ahmed:

"The disinformation dozen aren't just 12 individuals, but they essentially act ... as marketing tools of the overall anti-vax credo," he said.

As if being Anti-bad vax is a bad thing. You see, what they always fail to make clear is that what they call “anti-vaxxers” are really not all anti-vaxxers, but many, like Del and myself, are not anti-vaxxers, but “anti-bad vaxxers”. We are people who object to the unethical use of vaccines or experimental shots that are called vaccines on the population that are known to harm and even kill people. But people like Tom and those he works for, don’t really care about those harmed it seems, they seem to be more concerned about pleasing those who financially profit off of vaccine sales.

The article continues with another mini-bold caption after which Tom continues to quote Ahmed:

A targeted audience
Different anti-vaxxers target different segments of the population, Ahmed said, citing specific communities like yoga-and-wellness followers. ICAN, meanwhile, has sought to build these ties by emphasizing a hostility to liberal and scientific "elites" shared by anti-vaxxers and Trump fans, he said.

I want you to notice why Tom is using this quote from Ahmed, it is a claim that ICAN is hostile towards, liberals (leftist) and scientific “elites” just as other ant-vaxxers and Trump fans.
In other words, Del Bigtree and his organization are anti-Science and anti-liberals, so if you are a scientist or a liberal, you should not trust him.
The problem is that you will be hard pressed to find Del saying anything hostile about or to the general scientific elite, or liberals, (many of whom support Del), but you will find him objecting to the dishonest scientists who push the Covid –“vaccine” agenda. And he uses honest Scientific elites to do it.

He continues with the Ahmed Quote:

Bigtree, in particular, had "made it their focus to target people with Republican values or who are Trump adherents," Ahmed said. In fact, the ICAN CEO had appeared at an event before the January 6 "Stop the Steal" rally in Washington, DC, that preceded the attack on the US Capitol.

You have to hand it to this guy, note how he selects quotes from Ahmed that gives several of the talking points of the "left". Trump is the problem, the January 6 stop the steal rally in DC, and the attack on the US Capital, all in one sentence. None of which has anything to do with the topic of the article. But it is stuck into the article to connect Del to vilified Trump. And yet nothing is said about the way in which the "left" has demonized anyone who dared to say that the election was stolen or that the riot at the Capital was not Trumps fault, or carried out by only Trump supporters, in spite of the mounting evidence that is being uncovered that shows that there may well have been massive voter fraud, and that the January 6th riot at the Capital was not by crazy Trump supporters only, but was carefully orchestrated by Antifa, and other anti-America groups. Nor will anything be said about the revelation that Trump hating FBI agents were involved with the “attack” on the US Capital.

What is stated by Tom Porter, is all that is needed, since so much disinformation about the Election voter fraud, (claiming there was none), and the Attack on the US Capital, (claiming it was Trump's fault and by only Trump supporters), has been so thoroughly saturated throughout the "left" media, and even by some deceived conservatives.

To his credit, Tom later in this article admits that Del Bigtree denied targeting Trump supporters or any particular group, but sought to get the message out to anyone who would listen.

He continues:

Also present were anti-vaxxers Charles and Ty Bollinger, who have featured on Bigtree's influential podcast "The Highwire," which was recently removed by YouTube for violating anti-disinformation policies. Another major anti-vax activist and "Highwire" guest, Joseph Mercola, has appeared on Steve Bannon's podcast, further illustrating how the movements have cross-fertilized. 

This quote seeks simply to identify others who have clout that are pushing the same message as Del. Its another signal to leftists to target them also.  And again, the “anti-vaxxers” label is intentionally being used to misinform his readers about those who seek to tell the truth about Covid and the Covid injections. And to say that Youtube removed material for "violating anti-disinformation policies", that is a honor, since Youtube has been proven to be a tool of the "left", and regularly targets conservative content. And Yourube has become the gate keepers for medical institutions, big pharma and those in the government who are pushing the covid shots as the only solution for Covid.  
 
He continues:

Last October, Bigtree appeared at AMP Fest, hosted at Trump's Doral resort in Florida, alongside influencers from the pro-Trump QAnon conspiracy-theory movement. 

Again, note that none of this is relevant to the article other than to connect Del to the hated Trump, so as to discredit him by association. They can’t refute Del’s arguments or his medical message, so they just connect him with Trump, whom they have already sufficiently made the devil to many on the "left", and even some on the "right" as well.

And it continues in the next statement:

Tara Smith, a professor of epidemiology at Kent State University, told Insider that Bigtree had long hosted guests who backed Trump's attempts to downplay the pandemic or undermine public-health officials. "His bottom line pushes distrust of the government and experts, which fits in well with the Trump playbook," she said. 

Notice how Trump keeps coming up in the article? This is seven times, and there will be more. This is no accident; it is a tactic. They have put so much time and resources into making him the boogie man, that even though he is out of office they have to use him at every opportunity to discredit others who are on the "right". They can’t do it so easily by actually refuting their arguments, that is to difficult, so they will discredit them by connecting them to Trump.  Then accuse them of not trusting the experts. It does not matter that Del told Tom in the interview that he relies on the experts. And also notice that Tom does not tell us if professor Tara Smith was a leftist.
 
The accusation that Trump Downplayed the pandemic, and undermined public health officials ignores the constant attacks the "left" leveled against him throughout the “pandemic”, a part of which was to twist what he said and make everything he did seem crazy as an effort to destroy his presidency.

Many of Trump’s actual errors were due to the leftist Democratic interference. The atrocities committed against Trump by the "left" is public record. And people who believe everything that the media has said about Trump should be ashamed, as this article by John Perazzo indicates.
 
Most readers and viewers who digest leftists reporting, don’t realize how they are being trained to think anti-conservative by the manner in which the "left" reports their news.
 
He continues with his Trump guilt by association:

Ana Santos Rutschman, Assistant Professor of Law at Saint Louis University, said ICAN and Bigtree were "taking advantage of the way anti-vaccine messages resonate with many Trump supporters and deliberately propagating vaccine disinformation with those supporters in mind."

Again, Ana Santos Rutschman is not identified as a leftist. And she is allowed to accuse Del of propagating vaccine disinformation without any evidence and without Del being allowed to respond.

She continued:

As well as forming ties with the right, ICAN has spearheaded legal challenges to vaccine mandates in schools and other organizations across the US. 

Her comments indicate she is a leftist, and she comments on his legal challenges to Covid jab mandates as if that is a bad thing. Can’t she nor Tom understand the danger of mandating Covid jabs? Are they that blind that they cannot see where such efforts to mandate the taking of medicine leads? Suddenly, we no longer have a right to decide what is done to our bodies when it comes to the Covid jabs. The fact that she does not commend this effort to stop a human rights violations is evidence of her complacency and lack of patriotism. The fact that the Covid virus can be treated successfully with other well known, tried and proven medicines that have been blacklisted by the Covid "vaccine" profiteers, makes their mandates even more criminal.   

The article continues:

Bigtree defended his position in a telephone interview with Insider. "We simply are a consumer-advocacy group that seeks to make sure that people are getting the safest products they can. There is a protocol to how we approve pharmaceutical drugs, and we believe that vaccines should adhere to those same protocols and principles," he said.  He said public-health officials and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were wrong to advocate Americans to get the shot: "I believe it's reckless. I believe it's dangerous and I think it is unnecessarily putting people in unknown risk situations."

Tom Porter selectively left out the comments that Del made about why the Covid “vaccines” were dangerous, namely because it takes years for a vaccine to be properly tested, it takes years, because that’s how long it takes to monitor long term effects. But to include this would make people who read it to start thinking critically about the dangerous rush job the Pro-Covid vaxxers had done. Then President Trump, foolishly allowed the Leftist Democrats and some stupid socalled conservatives, to pressure him into carelessly trusting greedy pharmaceutical profiteers and unethical pharmaceutical connected agents like HHS Secretary Alex Azar for a quick fix to the Covid crisis. And they saw to it that a rushed vaccine solution took precedent over all other possible solutions. Trump's foolish agreement to pour billions into that vaccine production makes him the main culprit in the crime. Because without the money it never would have happened. As a Trump supporter, I refuse to lie about his blame. Though he certainly is not alone, he does share the blame. Yes, he thought he was doing the right thing, but he was wrong. And they were manufacturing the Covid "vaccines" before anyone had it, even in Emergency Use Authorization".
The Trump administration's appointment of scientist Moncef Slaoui as Chief adviser, rather than someone with medical morals was a horrible error.

The bottom line is that so much money was foolishly and totally unnecessarily poured into Vaccine development and distribution, that the government refused to not get its money's worth. They now must use them and the public is the guinea pig.       

So rather than say anything that would make people think for themselves, he does what they usually do. Just claim that the Covid “vaccines” are safe, and quote the CDC and FDA, both of which are known to lie to the public, and that can’t be trusted.

He continues:

Claims that the vaccines have not been properly tested for safety have been squarely rejected by most public-health professionals and infectious-disease experts. The shots have been found in clinical and real-world trials to be safe and effective.

Note his source of authority:

The CDC says on its website that the US COVID-19 vaccines "have undergone and will continue to undergo the most intensive safety monitoring in US history." The Food and Drug Administration fully approved Pfizer's vaccine on Monday, saying "the public can be very confident that this vaccine meets the high standards for safety, effectiveness, and manufacturing quality."

At the beginning of the interview, Del explained to Tom why he felt that the Covid “vaccines” were not safe, since vaccine trials must be done over a period of years in order to be able to determine if there are any long-term effect, or harmful effects after a long period, that can’t be determined over a short period. This makes this statement by Tom dishonest, since he does not ever mention Del’s comment on this. Additionally, Del has reported on the dishonesty and lack of credibility of the CDC and FDA. And public-health professionals and infectious-disease experts are on the payroll of the government or some institution that also is, so their agreement with the governments claims about the safety of the Covid "vaccines" is hardly a surprise. 

To Tom’s limited credit, he does us this Quote from Del:

Bigtree denied allegations that he had sought to broker ties specifically with Trump supporters, saying he would not "waste time" on supporters of " a man who is no longer president." He also said he has "never quoted or given any attention to the myth of Q," referring to the QAnon conspiracy-theory movement. On his decision to speak at the event preceding the January 6 rally, Bigtree said: "Wherever there's a large audience that will hear the information that we have to share, then I will go there."

But Tom failed to mention that Del also said he was willing to even speak at the Democratic convention if they invited him to. But to say that would not help the narrative here, which is the Del is a rightwinger and he only works for the right.

I will conclude by commenting on the next two statements:

He also said that while he personally doesn't have any medical qualifications, his work as a producer covering science on TV programs like the "Dr. Phil" show qualified him for his role at ICAN.

If you watched the interview, you know that is not quite what Del said.

The next comment is a great example exposing Tom’s dishonesty:

He said he regularly consulted with medical experts about scientific research on vaccines, but declined to share a list of the experts when asked by Insider.

If you have watched the interview, you know that this is a boldface lie. Not only did Del offer to provide Tom with a list of experts, but he also named several of them during the interview. So you have to ask yourself, why would Tom tell such a lie, when he knows that it can easily be checked? Because Tom like most reporters, has no respect for his readers. He assumes that we are so stupid that we will just take his word for it.

The last section titled "Selz money", is nothing more than a hit piece on Selz and a signal to leftists to go after his money. I will say that you should again notice how often Trump’s name is mentioned, five more times. Proving my point about their agenda to capitalize on all of the hard work they put into making Trump a boogie man. That makes it something like fourteen times Trump’s name is mentioned in a article that is not about him.

It is also important for me to note that Imran Ahmed is again used as a source to attack Selz.
And he is the same source that CNN used to attack another Champion of medical Truth Dr. Joseph Mercola. Dr. Mercola does a fine job defending himself on his site but the article may not remain there long so, if you need a copy, just contact me, it is well worth having, since Dr. Mercola documents what CNN failed to reveal to their audience, he shares the email that he sent to CNN responding to their questions and proving that CNN did not really want his answers but only to make their viewers think he was a quack.  My only disappointment about the CNN hit is that Dr. Mercola refused to talk to the CNN lady that invaded his home area. I think he should have used that opportunity to tell her what he thought of CNN and why he would not talk to her about anything on camera, because they would only edit it and spin it to discredit him, just as they did anyway. In the CNN video, aside from acknowledging it was a best seller, they only trash his book, but never refuted it.

This is Del’s response to the Insider Report on Him.
This is the Business Insider article by Tom Porter.
 
I hope this review helps you to understand why it is so important to use great caution when watching the news, and to scrutinize what your are being told with careful research of your own.  If you are a Christian, you should know that God forbids lying and He holds us all accountable for untruths and lies we tell or help to spread.

Colossians 3:9
"Lie not one to another, seeing that ye have put off the old man with his deeds;"
1 Timothy 2:7
"Whereunto I am ordained a preacher, and an apostle, (I speak the truth in Christ, and lie not;"
1 John 2:21
"I have not written unto you because ye know not the truth, but because ye know it, and that no lie is of the truth."
Revelation 22:15
"For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and makes a lie."

With that truth in mind, I encourage you to please contact me if you fine anything in this article, or anything that I have written that is untrue or inaccurate. I would greatly appreciate the correction.  
 
 

"vaccine" The Topic was: “Towards an educated covid response that respects”. And the interview was hosted by NTD Journalist Brendon Fallon.

I don’t generally promote the comments of people who I don’t believe are dedicated to truth or at least to speaking truth when they talk about a matter. But I am making an exception here, because Dr. Hooman, while foolishly supporting and proclaiming the greatness and benefits of the Covid “vaccines”, a view that I strongly disagree with, he also surprisingly makes a number of true statements about Covid “vaccines” and other things that are being promoted by the Pro-Covid “vaccine” community that I think people need to hear. His admission that many of the Covid “vaccines” that people are receiving, are spoiled and worthless due to improper storage, His admission that human immunity via natural infection is a viable means of getting protection from the Covid virus, and that there is much misinformation and poor medical procedural practices and policies being promoted by the powers that be, including the CDC, FDA and medical institutions.
 
Who is Dr. Hooman Noorchashm? He is an establishment agent in my opinion, but he is not the typical establishment agent, he seems to be a sort of maverick, a rouge agent who dared to deviate from some of the establishment's approved message. That is what makes him an important person to hear. 

But as I said, he is also someone who thinks that the Covid "vaccines" are the best we have created, and he says he is a recipient of the vaccine. (050-1:11,1:51-2:03). 
 
This is certainly not the case, since there are many sources who have documented the dangerous violations of proper trials that were ignored to fast track the vaccines and the political and medical deceptions that were engaged to trick government officials, (including then President Trump), to accept the need to bypass safety protocols to make the vaccines available to the public. The dangers of the type of “vaccine” that the Covid “Vaccine” is was also down played by the CDC, the WHO, the FDA, the NIH, the Covid "vaccine" creators and the governments that jumped in line to pour billions into the "vaccine" purchase so that they would be seen as doing all they could to save lives. And some no doubt made a killing from stock they have in the pharmaceutical industry and the patents they hold. It has been reported that the Covid "Vaccines" have made 9 people new billionaires.
 
The High Wire.com and others have well documented the dangers of not only the process by which the Covid "vaccines" were brought to the public, but also of the vaccines themselves due to their content.
 
So Dr. Hooman is wrong here, either knowingly or ignorantly.
 
But he is right, (and I am delighted to hear him admit it), when he then says that it is a mistake to treat the Covid “vaccines” as if one size fits all.
(I think that calling it a “mistake” is an understatement).
 
He is correct when he says that it is wrong, but incorrect when he says, it is wrong because it is only helpful to those who have not had Covid. The “Vaccines” provide little help to those who have taken them. They cannot prevent Covid, and they cannot cure Covid. They are not actually “vaccines”, and the way they affect the human body  and the secret ingredients they contain may makes them more a problem than a help. Evidence reveals that the spike protein does not remain in one place as claimed, but travels throughout the body.  A variety of conditions has been documented as resulting from the “vaccines”, and a large numbers of deaths, although under reported, have been connected to the Covid “vaccines”.
 
This information is not being reported by the major media, but it is being reported.
 
He correctly said that those who have had Covid and are building up natural immunity do not need the vaccine. And if they take or have taken it, it will only potentially harm them, in addition to being a “violation of medical necessity as a principle of medical ethics. (1:12-1:50, 2:04-2:09). You will not hear this in major media.
 
He objects to the indiscriminate manner that the “Covid vaccines” are being applied to people who DON’T NEED IT BECAUSE THEY ARE ALREADY IMMUNED.
 
The fact that you are not hearing about this from the mainstream media, but only the opposite, “YOU MUST TAKE THE VACCINE” message, should concern you.
 
When asked by host  Brendon Fallon, (2:10-2:19) if he thought the government’s identifying the Delta variant as the reason for the breakthrough infections that are occurring was correct, he replied, (2:20-3:37) that while it is possible that the variant Delta virus was bypassing the vaccine immunity, (since his concern was that a variant could bypass the vaccine), he did not think it was likely that the sequence variation of the Delta virus was actually bypassing the vaccines canonical sequence, (he did not explain why). He seemed to contradict himself. He stated that he was concerned that a variant could bypass the vaccine, but when asked if that happened with the Delta variant, he says no. But he does not explain why.
(It could be that Dr. Hooman may have stock in the “vaccines” and he feels the need to protect his investment).
 
Other medical professionals have long warned that the so called Covid “Vaccines” only targeted one type of the virus and did not have the ability to deal with variants. This is why honest medical professionals are promoting human immunity via T-Cells, over “vaccinations” for people healthy enough to handle covid, since the human body can develop immunity for all of the variants, and not just one.  But focusing on the dangers of “variants” is a fear tactic being used by the Pro-Covid “Vaccinators” to scare people into getting the “Vaccine”. So they are not going to focus on any real alternatives unless they are forced to do so by informed public pressure.
 
There is a lot about the proper way to deal with corona viruses that is being blocked from the public in favor of vaccinating everyone.
 
Dr. Hooman said he thought it was FAR MORE LIKELY that the break through infections was due to vaccine failure due to poor storage of the vaccines, and thus the diminishing of their potency.
 
He also said that the mRNA is one of the most unstable biological molecules known to mankind (ooops, how sexist of him). He said he would go so far as to state that it is THE most unstable molecule known to mankind (oops again, that was clearly not a mistake, he may hear from some feminists associations).
 
[Note: Dr. Peter Malone, inventor of the mRNA technology does not agree. Dr. Malone is on record stating that the mRNA is not as unstable as many believe.]  
 
Dr. Hooman said that it is reasonable to “POSTULATE” that a significant portion of people in the United States and across the world, are potentially getting vaccine doses that have spoiled.
 
He said we already know that 4 to 5 percent of fully vaccinated people are not getting fully immunized. (He does not say how we know this percentage is accurate, they often throw around such percentages as if they are accurate and unquestionable, that is part of their scam. And given their dishonesty and extent that they have been going to to get the Covid shots into every human being on earth, It is reasonable to think that they would vastly under report any such negative information.
 
He says that it could be because of a genetic component in the individuals being vaccinated, (again, not explained), or from VACCINE SPOILAGE.
 
The spoiled “vaccines” issue is true, but you will not be hearing this in mainstream media, because they are defending the false narrative that the “vaccines” are doing their job, which now suddenly, (after they have been proven not to be effective in preventing Covid as originally claimed or craftily insinuated by “the 95% effective” campaign), is to not prevent Covid or cure Covid, but to make the symptoms of Covid much less dangerous and uncomfortable, so that far fewer people will die from it. Can you see the word games they are playing with the public?
 
Then he goes on to object (3:35-4:27) to another important, (I think unethical), effort of the Federal government, which is, he says, to DISCOURAGE people from testing their antibody status and their immunity status following vaccination … to determine if the vaccine has worked for you. He said “this is a big mistake”.
 
No, it is not a mistake, since it is intentional. I say it is a big tragedy and a government failure to look out for the good of the citizens. They are boasting about how they have provided the “vaccines” to save lives, while at the same time, as Dr. Hooman says, they are discouraging people from checking the effectiveness of the vaccines that the governments are pushing on the public. The question is, why are they discouraging something that will prove the effectiveness of the “vaccines”, and give the “vaccinated” a much better ability to assess the benefit of having been “vaccinated”?
 
The host then asked Dr. Hooman Noorchashm, (4:27-4:31) what could we estimate the spoilage of the “vaccines” to be. And his reply was (5:35-6:14)
 
“I think it’s reasonable to guesstimate upwards of 20% of the vaccine doses that are going into people’s arms, may actually not be effective, the mRNA may have spoiled. And I think this needs to be interrogated very carefully. I don’t think the FDA or Pfizer and Moderna can just blow this off.”
 
I fully agree, only I think it may be much more than just 20%, but this will not be repeated in the media, unless the informed public is made aware of it and pressures them to address it.
 
The host, Brendon Fallon, then asked why he thought that the CDC was deterring people from having antibody tests? (6:14-20)
 
Dr. Hooman Noorchashm replyed, (6:21-6:58), that it was the most shocking piece of anti-science that had ever come out of any of our public health agencies. He said the anti-body test is the gold standard for immunity testing. We are in the middle of a pandemic where determination of immunity is critical for getting people out of trouble. And here we have a major public institution of the United States… the CDC discouraging anti body testing. He said he did not think they were very good at public messaging.
 
(I don’t agree, I think they know what they are doing, and it is intentional).
 
And while I agree that it is shocking anti-science, it is hardly the most shocking piece of anti-science that has come out of our public health agencies. The existence of the so-called Covid “Vaccines” and their emergency use is even more shocking. Also, some medical experts on our side also say that it is not anti-bodies that are the gold standard but T-cells that establish immunity.
 
He said that frankly they made strategic decisions that sort of cuts out democracy from the conversation. 
 
No, not sort of, “It DOES” cut out democracy from the conversation.
 
He then finally got around to actually answering the question why? (6:58-7:42).
 
“This idea of why aren’t we testing antibodies, well. Were not testing antibodies because they are worried that a substantial number of people are …gonna find out that the vaccine didn’t work for them”.
 
He then had the nerve to say, “that’s okay!” He said that the idea that the average American is not intelligent enough to understand that look it’s a medicine like any other medicine, it’s got a failure rate. And we should accept that.
 
Oh really, what about the hype campaign they pushed on us about the 95 to 98% effectiveness of the vaccine to get us to take it? Where was the failure rate disclosure in that campaign?

I don't know what it is with the people on the left who think "most" Americans are so dumb that they can't understand even simple matters. But we do not have to accept the establishment blocking or hiding from us important information or treatments.
 
He then says that the FDA and the CDC should come out in a very transparent way (and say)…this is what’s going on.
 
I agree, but don’t hold your breath waiting for them to do so.
As I said, unless informed public pressure is put on them to do so, it will not happen.
 
The host then asked (7:40-7:52) why he thought there was not more health experts coming out and criticizing the way the government is pressuring people to take the Covid "vaccines"?
 
Dr. Hooman replied that it was fear (7:52-9:01) Fear of liability, of political backlash. There have been instances where state medical boards have come out and said that physicians who do not follow the establishment narrative and majority consensus, risks losing their licenses. So you’re talking about cohesive forces that are stopping many physicians who should know better and who know better, to stay silent on this.
 
He said that this is causing a minority of people dangerous medical issues, certainly people who have an active infection can be harmed by vaccination. This could be and has been a catastrophe for some people.
 
By willingly putting people in danger without just cause, he says it goes against the grain of medical ethics, individual liberty and the fundamental tenet of our Constitutional rights, and the government’s responsibility to protect individual rights.  (12:14-12:49)

Did you get that? he is on the left, he is a pro-Covid "vaccine" agent, and he is saying that those promoting the Covid "vaccine" are putting people in danger by their policies and practices. So it is not only us anti-Covid "vaccine" people who notice the dangers.
 
The host then asked what would be a better way for the government to handle this? (12:50-12:57)
 
Dr. Hooman said the people who are Covid recovered should be exempt from any vaccine requirement.

But the Por-Covid "vaccine" community are insisting that we all get the shot, no matter our natural immunity. And those of you who follow them can't see the problem? 

He said (12:58-14:45) that he did believe that in some cases an immunity requirement does make sense, such as in highly congested places, in institutions where high risk people live, healthcare settings, schools.
 
Notice how he mixes “congested places” and schools, with “High Risk people”. This is the game that they play. Confusing the issue like this makes it easy for them to promote the illusion that more people are at risk then actually are.
 
The fact is that the only people who are at risk are the elderly 65 and over, and the sickly. Not the healthy. So crowded (Congested places) and Schools are not places where immunity should be “required” as he claims. People who are sickly or elderly and at risk should be the ones required or better, should make sure that they avoid places where they could contract the virus. Healthy people should not be controlled to protect the at risk. Whenever you here this kind of language, you should be suspicious about the person using it.
 
He said that there should also be room for medical exemptions and moral or ideological exemptions since they would be a very small percentage, less than 5 percent in our country. He gave no reason for that assumption. But said they should be accommodated as well since the threshold for heard immunity is about 90 percent. So if 5 percent wanted to avoid vaccination, we could still get to heard immunity.

The problem is that I doubt that religious people who reject the shot on religious convictions only make up 5 percent of the population. its probably much higher. But we don't need a religious reason, we have a Constitutional and human rights reason not to be forced to take the shot.  

The host then asked him about what he thought about New York’s vaccination mandates
(14:56-14:59)
 
Dr. Hooman (15:00-17:05) sided with forced mandates as not a bad thing, claiming that he understood the New York leaders and peoples concern for their safety.
 
This is clearly a contradiction, since he earlier acknowledged the violations of their Constitutional rights by government failing to encourage testing that would inform people of their immunity status. And he acknowledged the unethicalness of such failings. He also acknowledged a 20 percentage failure of the Covid vaccines, (although I think the percentage is probably much higher, and for more reasons than just a failed storage procedure). So, for him to then say that mandating vaccinations are understandable, indicates a desire on his part to appease the very powers he has been slighting by pointing out their wrongs.
 
He also inadvertently revealed his leftist political view by citing the Supreme Court’s ruling in the case of Jack Phillips, when he openly said he did not agree with Phillips’s right of refusal to serve the homosexual couple from his political perspective, calling it exclusionary behavior.
 
But he cites that case and the Supreme Court’s ruling that private businesses have the right to impose policies on customers. He then said that as the law of the land that government has the capacity to do so also. But he said that we should be reasonable and allow people who had Covid to be exempt.
 
To his credit, he admitted that the mask mandates are nothing more than a band aid and psychological crutch. That cloth masks are not going to prevent transmission of SARS Covid 2, and that NATURAL IMMUNITY was also an important part of overcoming this Covid crisis.
 
This is something that is ignored in favor of promoting the total vaccination focus by the government, big pharma and media.

The insane MASK requirements being passed off as some kind of scientifically proven safety measure, is not only dishonest scientifically, it is morally deceptive. Any thinking person knows that breathing in what you breath out over long periods of time day in and out is not healthy.  
 
He also admitted that Covid recoveries have a better immunity than vaccinated people do (18:56-19:13), This is something that is strongly objected to by the Covid Vaccine pushers, who seek to make a financial killing (pun intended) off of the Covid “Vaccines”. They have a vested interest in keeping that knowledge from the public. They don’t want the public to be aware of the potency of natural immunity.
 
Hooman, (19:14-20:46) while correctly acknowledging the harmful divisiveness that exists in our society today between the pro-Covid "Vaccinationist" and the anti-Covid "vaccinationist", incorrectly attribute it to the public’s ignorance of the power of our natural immunity ability.

He totally ignored the role that the “Vaccine” makers, and investors, the governments that paid them for the vaccines, and the News and social media and big pharma that have been putting massive amounts of time and money into misinforming the public about the Covid Viruses, the Covid vaccines, and the Covid infection and death rates, plays in the great divide. Why should have been a question asked by the host.
 
Since Dr. Hooman seems to understand the power of natural human immunity, why is it that he has not complained about the manner in which a rushed Covid vaccine was made the primary focus of our remedy to the Covid crisis?  Instead, he praises the Covid Vaccine as something great.
 
Why has he not addressed the many other medical practice violations committed by the medical professionals in charge of setting policies during such crisis, and the government’s blind compliance to their malpractice?
 
These are things that Dr. Peter McCullough and other ethical medical professionals are trying to get to the public.
 
As I said, I do not agree with Dr. Hooman’s praise of the Covid “Vaccines”. In Fact, I do not believe they are vaccines at all.
 
But I appreciate the things that he has said that are in line with the truth, and I hope that those points will be made to the mass media and social media that seems to delight in lying to the public in favor of “GETTING EVERYONE VACCINATED”.

Below are four links to other articles I have written on Covid. Please consider reading, and feel free to post a comment. I am honestly open for correction, so don't hesitate to do so.  

Article One  Article Two Article Three  Article  Four

EXCLUSIVE: Why Testing COVID Immunity is as Important as Vaccination. Feat. Dr. Hooman NoorchashmWide Angle with Brendon Fallon Published August 23, 2021

[Note: please click on all blue text to see linked reference]

"When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked bear rule, the people mourn." (Proverbs 29:2)

What we are seeing in our society today is another striking conformation of the wickedness that is in the hearts of sinful humans. It is the consequence of having ungodly people who are ruled by greed and the hunger for power and material possessions, in positions of power and influence. People who care little for the well-being of the masses, and have the conscience of a Pal Pot, Hitler or Stalin. But who cleverly claim to care for us publicly, while making deals behind closed doors that harm us, for their profit. Deals that result in policies that they then publicly proclaim as being "for our benefit", when in truth, they are for our demise. Indeed, we are living is strange times.

THIS PLANDEMIC IS ONLY SUCCESSFUL BECAUSE OF THE WILLINGNESS OF SO MANY
TO BELIEVE WHAT THEY SEE ON TV AND SOCIAL MEDIA WITHOUT CRITICAL THINKING

I have to say that as a Christian minister, I am both shocked and disappointed by the way so many professing Christians are falling for the disinformation of the covid "Vaccine" advocates.  

I always wondered what the details were on how anti-christ would deceive the world into taking the mark of the beast. The Bible says that it will be due to the false prophet having power to do signs and wonders (Revelations 13:14-17), but it seems that miracles are not even needed today. All that is needed is a constant mass blitz of disinformation by the controlled media, instructed by big Pharma and their disciples in medical and educational institutions that are funded by them, and promoted and funded by a government that has big pharma agents throughout its branches. Oh, and yes, you would need a blind dead, dumb or extremely compromised church. This perfect storm of deception has occurred.

Yes, the Covid virus is real, and people are dying, but Covid is not nor has it ever been as bad, dangerous, and difficult to treat as those who are pushing the Covid "Vaccines" have been telling the public, in order to stir extreme fear and drive people to take the Covid "vaccine". What they  have done is lied to the public, by collecting many deaths that were due to the usual illnesses, and attributed them to Covid to horribly exaggerate the Covid death rates. Hospitals were given large financial incentives to log each death in their hospitals as a Covid death, and a large number of people who died of the Flu and other issues were claimed to have died of Covid. Just look at the massive drop in Flu death since Covid.  Additionally, the many sickly people who actually did die of Covid, died because of "non-treatment or wrong treatments like ventilators and remdisivir commanded by the pro-vaccine big pharma, the CDC, FDA and other agencies that stood to most benefit from Covid "vaccines". And Anthony Fauci knew about this and said nothing to stop it.
Medical professionals like Dr. Peter McCullough is on record stating how he was able to save many who were Covid infected by not following the unethical commands, but by doing what he was under oath to do, treat patients and save lives.

BUT SOME WILL ASK, WHAT ABOUT THE STATISTICS BEING REPORTED THAT SHOW THE MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF PEOPLE INFECTED WITH COVID, DYING FROM COVID AND THE VAST DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE DEATHS OF THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN VACCINATED FROM THOSE WHO HAVE NOT BEEN?

My question would be, WHO IS IN CONTROL OF THE DATA THAT IS BEING REPORTED TO THE PUBLIC? Just listen to the media when they give the sources of their statistics, (that is, "when", they give the sources of their statistics). It is almost always the WHO, the FDA, the CDC or some university or medical institution that is paid by the government or big Pharma. And some can't see a conflict of interest there?

Why would any of these sources publish honest reports that would kill the validity of their "you must have the COVID VACCINE campaign message?" It is like putting the Fox in charge of the hen house, you know what's going to be on the dinner menu.  

If a thousand people reported to them, and of the thousand, nine hundred reported that they had negative effects from the Covid "Vaccines", becoming deathly sick and or dying. Do you really think that is what they will report to the public?  Or is it more likely that they will cook the books as it were and report that one hundred had negative effects while nine hundred did well?

And do you really think that doctors and medical professionals are being pressured to report and record all adverse effects that result from taking the Covid injections? Why would they, when doing so would strongly work against their "the Covid vaccines are safe and effective" campaign? But don't take my word, visit thehighwire.com and find Episode 233: "The Vaers Scandal" it starts at the 1:16:21 point of the video. Hear for your self what happened when a true medical professional who actually puts the patients first, tried to do the right thing and complain about the level of bad instructions and lack of instructions in her institution, and the way it caused people who were covid "vaccinated" and got sick from the covid "vaccinations, to be poorly cared for. It is a powerful revelation proving that the FDA and other health organizations are not encouraging or pressuring medical professionals to report on VAERS which is the primary organ for obtaining statistics on the vaccines effects and their effectiveness. Note, the CDC has made every effort to discredit VAERS to prevent people from knowing how much harm the Covid "vaccines" are actually doing to people.

And since it is the long term effects that require years of observation that really prove that a new medicine is safe and effective, we won't know just how much harm these COVID injections will do to those who have taken them until those who are responsible for the damage, politically and medically have taken the money and ran, moving on to obscurity while the new leadership deal with the fall out.

You say but what about the reports coming from states around our nation and the nations of the world?
 
Let's think about this, the government officials of those states and countries are the people who made the decision to PURCHASE the Covid "Vaccines" at a cost of Billions, thinking, or claiming that they would save lives by making those "Vaccines" available to their citizens. (We won't talk about how much of that Trillions of dollars, that was claimed to be spent for Covid, was instead put into the pockets of political leaders and their friends).
Do you honestly think that they would willingly publish reports that clearly showed that the "Vaccines" were dangerous, or did not work? Again, you have a fox over the hen house problem.

MANY OF THE OFFICIALS OF THE FDA, THE CDC,THE NIH, AND THE WHO, COME OUT OF BIG PHARMA AND STILL HAVE CONNECTIONS TO THEM. Even the leftist news media "The Hill" reported on the FDA's connection to Big Pharma. 

They go into these regulating organizations with loyalties to big pharma. And most if not all of their decisions are made to favor big pharma. Who can forget the MONSANTO crimes?

THIS IS WHY THEY HAVE DECIDED TO INLIST THE AID OF BIG TECH AND THE MEDIA TO CENSOR ALL CONTRARY NEWS AND INFORMATION THAT CONTRADICTS THEIR CLAIMS. OPEN DEBATE WOULD NOT BE IN THEIR FAVOR, BECAUSE THEY WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO CONTROL MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS AND SCIENTISTS WHO HAD INTEGRITY  AND A CONSCIENCE, AND WOULD REFUSED TO LIE TO KEEP THEIR LICENSE OR JOB, KNOWING THAT BY DOING SO THEY WOULD BE HELPING TO HARM OR EVEN KILL PEOPLE.

Having such people expose the lies of Covid "vaccine" promoters, in open, public debate would kill there Covid "vaccine" agenda.

WHAT THE PLANDEMIC HAS REVEALED
(Evil people determined to take power)

The manner in which the authorities have promoted disinformation as sound policies, reliable science and prudent medical practice, and taken steps to censor all medical professionals and scientists who seek to tell the truth, calling them disinformationist, should disturb any thinking citizen. It shows the limits to which such people will go to in order to accomplish their goal of enriching themselves while at the same time, controlling the masses through population control and a universal identification system.

If they are willing to not only boldly lie to the public, about Covid, the so-called Covid "Vaccine", the infection and death rates of Covid, and the safe and effective alternative medicines to treat Covid, even forbidding people access to these life-saving medicines, in order to promote the Covid "vaccines, why would any thinking person assume that they would not be capable of intentionally contaminating batches of successful alternative medication like hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin and other helpful medicines, so that they will harm or even kill people to make is seem like these good alternative treatments are dangerous, or not safe, and only their Covid "Vaccines" will solve the Covid problem?  

As it stands, the many alternative cheap medications that are known to successfully treat and protect against Covid deaths, are the biggest threat to their "Vaccine" agenda. And so, they must discredit them by any means possible. And they have wickedly tried to outlaw those inexpensive, extremely effective well known alternative medicines, so that they could Sell the public on the absolute need for a Covid "Vaccine", worth trillions to them in profit.

This means that anyone who openly tries to destroy or downplay the importance of those alternative medications is probably a part of the Covid Vaccine agenda.

What is unfortunate is that they have so much money and power, that they can keep the masses confused by instructing their many medical professionals on their payroll to go on youtube and just about every other social media and media platform, and attack every credible, formally well respected medical professional and scientist that attempts to sound the alarm and expose their lies, as a conspiracy theorist, a medical malpractitioner, or a quack that needs to be silenced.

Just look at what they are doing to Dr. Judy Mikovits, and other respected people who are being trashed by the powers, like Dr. Joseph Mercola, (Author of "The Truth about Covid 19", Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Robert Malone, (inventor of the mRNA technology), Dr. Sherri Tenpenny and Mike Yeadon, (former Phizer VP), all to keep the public from trusting their report about the horrible trick being played on the public by people with power and an agenda that does not have our best interests at heart.

Unfortunately they have influenced even respected and trusted Science Christian organizations like Creation Ministries International.  

The massive campaign that is being executed to shut down all opposition to the message they want the public to accept, by their control of the major media, social media, most pharmaceutical and medical institutions, and educational institutions, that get their funding from billionaires like Bill Gates, government and pharmaceutical companies.  And the large number of large companies that are in some way connected to the "Vaccine" money, all point to an effort to take control of the world and place it under a new world order.

After all, they have the money, the people power, the governmental power, (having key people in powerful government positions), the pharmaceutical power, the educational institutional power and the media and social media power, particularly Face Book, Youtube and Twitter. And such people are not the kind to give back power that they have taken. The only thing that stands in their way is an act of God. And given the manner in which the public has treated God by rejecting, ignoring or violating His word, there is little reason to think that God will stop their tyranny. In fact, the Bible has for told of just such a development in the world. (Revelations 13:16-17)

ACCOUNTABILITY FOR BELIEVING AND REPEATING DISINFORMATION

My warning to all who will listen, is that if you don't wake up and pay attention to those who are trying to tell you what is happening, if you don't stop blindly accepting and repeating what you hear on CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, The View, Roland Martin, Rachel Maddow, and other pro-Covid "vaccine" sources, you are accountable for their success and the harm their disinformation does to people.

CELEBRATING THOSE WHO ARE BOLD ENOUGH AND HUMANE ENOUGH TO SACRIFICE THEIR PERSONAL REPUTATION AND PROFESSIONAL CAREERS TO TELL THE TRUTH.

In spite of the mass disinformation being perpetrated on the public, and coming from a variety of trusted news, medical, governmental and educational sources, and the communist like censorship of any and all opposing views that seek to tell the truth about Covid and the so called "vaccines", there are many honest and quite intelligent and medically informed people who are indeed telling the truth about this issue. And we must support them and celebrate their efforts.

Thehighwire.com is a reliable source for updated information about Covid and Del Bigtree has dedicated his life to getting the facts out to people who want to know.
Additionally, Daystar has dedicated an entire page on their website to highly informative video interviews with great champions of vaccine truth.

THE PROBLEM OF GOOD PEOPLE WHO IGNORANTLY REPEAT FALSE INFORMATION WHILE AT THE SAME TIME TRYING TO INFORM US  ABOUT THE EVILS OF THE LEFTIST AGENDA

Sadly, there are many conservatives who while doing a fine job exposing the leftist agenda, are themselves promoters of false information when it comes to the Covid "Vaccines". Because they have accepted what the WHO, CDC, FDA, N I H and others say about the benefits of the Covid "Vaccines".

It is strange to listen to them expose the leftist agenda and sound the alarm against their policies and plots, and then in the same breath, proclaim or comment about how important getting the Covid "Vaccine" is to ending the "pandemic".

Some even correctly condemn the efforts to mandate masks and the Covid "Vaccines" While proclaiming the importance of taking the Covid "vaccine" by choice. Never once considering or accepting the possibility that the "Vaccines" could be harmful, or questioning the irrational manner in which they are pushing "Vaccines" over cheaper successful alternative medicines.

This kaleidoscope of information coming from so many different places is the primary cause of confusion, and that confusion serves the Covid "vaccine" pushers and their servants well.

But being bombarded with conflicting views is no excuse for us to accept and repeat disinformation. It is only a challenge for us to be all the more diligent in our scrutiny of the information that we accept as true, especially before we repeat of share that information with others.

Any decent person would abide by such a noble rule. But those of us who profess to be Christians, we are held by God to a higher standard.

We are required to provide things honest in the sight of all people Romans 12:17, We are not to be false witness Romans 13:9, We are not to lie Ephesians 4:25, Colossians 3:9. And we certainly are not to lie for profit, like the ungodly, Titus 1:10-11. And our speech is to be sound so that no one can justly condemn us. Titus 2:8.

Sadly for many professing Christians, none of these or any other mandate of Holy Scriptures that instruct us in how we are to conduct ourselves in this present world, seem to have any serious meaning.

Be that as it may, God will have the last word.

 
 
You may not have bothered to notice, but there is a myth being spread in our society about homosexuals, a myth that gives them an appeal that they do not deserve.
 
It claims that homosexuals are richer, smarter, more talented, kinder, happier, more tolerant, and even more successful, than straight people, and that without them (homosexuals) the world could not exist, or at least it would be a bland, boring, and horrible place to be.
 
That is the impression you get when you watch TV, Cable, Movies, or sit in a class at just about any public school or institution of higher education. And all that is taken as an undeniable evidence that homosexuality is not only good, but is wholesome and important to celebrate.
 
Yes some people who are homosexuals are smart, funny, friendly, neat, rich, successful and talented, but none of those things make homosexuality right nor are any of those thing unique to homosexuals, in fact, by true comparison, homosexuals are out numbered by straights, at least a million to one in all of those categories. So why are those attributes and characteristics presented in media, Hollywood and other places as if they are homosexual gifts to humanity?
 
Why have we allowed them to make it a crime to object to homosexuality or even voice our disagreement with the practice?
 
Why do we allow them to reinterpret actions, and redefine words so as to make their distorted lives seem normal and good?
 
Take “Love” for instance, everyone knows what love is, love can be defined in many ways but there are things that can never be defined as love, yet we allow them to overstep the bounds of what actually can be defined as love, and venture into strange perversions and still call it love. Why.
 
When a child or an adult raises a dog from a pup, or nurses a dog from physical harm or sickness back to health, it generally results in a bonding between that animal and their human master. That bond is often very strong, so strong in fact that it is tantamount to a family bond. The human would do just about anything for the animal. That is love, a good love, a normal love.
 
But what if that human decides that they love that animal so dearly that they “fall in love” with the animal and began to perceive that animal as a sexual partner?
 
Instead of just allowing the dog to lick their face and at times even their mouth, now, when the dog licks their mouth they open their mouth and lick the dog’s tongue, the dog now shares the same bed with them and eat at the same table as they do. But worst, they get naked and attempt to have sexual relations with the dog. Can that actually be called love?
 
Let me give you another example, lets say a man who has a successful business and makes lots of money decides to adopt a child he has seen in an adoption center. The child is 11, lets say a male. The man goes through the adoption process and is granted custody of the boy and they live together for a month in a normal parent child relationship. They form a bond and that is indeed a normal love. But then it becomes clear that the man had an arterial motive for adopting the boy, he is a boy lover, a secret member of NAMBA, an organization that promotes MAN/BOY sexual relations.
 
And lets say that the man begins to violate the boy while telling him that it is because he loves him. And lets say that the boy, being confused begins to enjoy what the man is doing to him sexually and eventually begins to willingly consent to the sexual relationship, even asking for it. Is that LOVE?
 
In our current state in which those who dominate the media, government and many education institutions, are either homosexual, ultra liberal and or suffer from some other kind of moral depravity that they have deemed a privilege of freedom to be forced upon society, the projected opinion over the airwaves is yes.
 
To the rational, thinking person who has not been effectively brainwashed by the careful and extensive programing of the morally twisted TV and Movie executives, producers, writers and actors, or by educators, medical professionals, clergy, book authors and publishers, etc., the answer is and always will be NO.
 
But what about those who say it is love? Well, first it must be acknowledged that not everyone who publicly state their support for such perversion are actually in support of such sickness. Many who openly express support for such depravity, do so because of their commitment to the propagators of such depravity with which they are in financial partnership, and they are simply protecting their financial investment, they are protecting their money. Others agree because they are deeply close to family members or friends who practice such depravity and they want to support their loved one. Additionally, there are those who have their own immoral vices and fetishes and don’t want anyone calling them strange for having them, and so they feel obligated to support the strange behavior of others. You see there are many reasons for support of depravity that people often don’t think about.
 
Now, I know what the common arguments are against such observations as I have just made, homosexual activists will object to any kind of comparison between homosexuality and bestiality or pedophilia. They will condemn such comparison as harsh and mean. But I will counter, by asking them on what bases do they object?
 
They will say that homosexuality is nothing like bestiality or pedophilia. And they will arrogantly demand an apology for even suggesting that there was a comparison.
 
But they would not stop there, that would be too easy to refute. So what they will try to do is make me feel as if I was the worst person on earth, by calling me every degrading name they can think of, (as if those names will actually define me), and hope that such accusations will cause me to be so ashamed that I will withdraw my analogy and apologize.
 
The sad fact is that such a counter attack has been extremely effective in the past and for that reason, homosexual activists and their supporters have made name calling and accusations a standard method of counter attack against anyone who dared to say or do anything to make homosexuality look like anything but a normal wholesome activity.
 
Additionally, when the person who has made such an “unacceptable” comparison to homosexuality, or said anything derogatory or unfavorable about homosexuality, is a public figure or a professional who owns a business, the homosexual activists will generally launch a massive campaign against them in the media and in his community, in an effort to destroy his business and his means of making a living. Boycott, attacking any corporate sponsors or material supplier he has, and any other tactic that will effectively cut off that person’s cash flow.
 
This is the kind of hostile actions homosexual activists have been using for many years to prevent moral people or anyone who objects to homosexuality from confidently speaking out against homosexuality. What is strange is that those who support homosexuality, rarely if ever acknowledge the cruelty of such tactics used by homosexual activists to silence those who object to their sinful depravity.
 
But why are such harsh tactics necessary to defend homosexuality? And why does a civilized free society allow such behavior to go on?
 
As to the first question, homosexual activists know that they have no moral ground to stand on; neither do they have a logical foundation on which to defend their depravity. Therefore, they must protect their depravity by force, and to do that, they would first have to get at least some level of control of the institutions that could execute such force, such as media, education, government, Hollywood and the judiciary. This they have apparently done.
 
And to date they have added many to their list of victims, and have effectively shut them down, and even forced some to undergo “sensitivity training”.
 
My question is, how and why did the Christian church allow such hostile entities as homosexual activists organizations to gain such a level of control in our society?
 
And why are Christian organizations so silent, dormant or supportive of this homosexual agenda?
 
Why are so many Christian Leaders afraid to even say that homosexuality is a serious sin and even renounce the few Christian celebrities and leaders who do openly take a stand against homosexuality?
 
And in fact, why is there so little united effort among Christian organizations to safeguard Christians from legal retribution and business assassination for daring to contend with homosexual activism? What is going on?
 
Ex-homosexuals and their organizations are poorly supported by the Christian churches or Christian individuals, major books by Christian authors that expose the homosexual agenda or provide intelligent and important insight into how we can understand their tactics and strategies and effectively counter them, as well as execute proactive agendas of our own, are poorly supported by the Christian Community.
 
Counter homosexual Christian organizations that specialize in providing love, counseling and support for homosexuals seeking deliverance from their homosexuality, are poorly funded or supported, Christian speakers who specialize in giving talks to educate Christians and Christian organizations on how to combat the homosexual agenda and protect their congregations and families are not in demand by Churches. And when such events are held, they are generally poorly attended by Christians; unless they are being done by mega churches (of which few are).
 
The question that needs to be asked of our Christian leaders is, why?
 
What will it take to get them to pool their resources together and finally let the homosexual activists know that they will no longer be punked by homosexual activist threats.

What will it take to get Christian pastors and organizations to more fully support organizations like "THE RESTORED HOPE NETWORK",  "LOVE & TRUTH NETWORK",  THE EVIDENCE MINISTRY, P-FOX, AMERICANS FOR TRUTH ABOUT HOMOSEXUALITY, MISSION AMERICA, FAMILY RESEARCH INSTITUTE, AMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION and other such groups. (we are not affiliated with either of these organizations but fully support the work that they do).

I am concerned by the lack of support that events that focus on informing the Church about such things are so poorly supported and attended here in New York, and elsewhere. And I would love to hear the reason. I  wait patiently for an answer.