It has been some time since I have written about the homosexual agenda and the tactics they have and are using to manipulate the public's thinking about homosexuality. Not because there is not enough material out here to prove my point, but because covering such madness is not something that I enjoy doing.
Looking into these disturbed minds that fancy themselves as God's give to the world, is not only sad, and depressing, but frustrating.
To have to examine crazy talk and expose it for what it actually is, because so many people are simply unwilling or unable to think for themselves, is not a pleasant way to spend my time. But I sleep much better, knowing that I have at least made the effort to pull the deceptive cover off of the homosexual activists and the supposedly reputable and oh so leftists papers and media sources that they are permitted to practice their craft in.
On October 22, 2018 the New York Times, a Leftist paper published an article written, (I suppose), by a transvestite that calls himself Jennifer Finney Boylan. The New York Times lists him as a contributing opinion writer. I wonder if they would publish a response article or any article for that matter, by a conservative with biblical convictions and sound Bible knowledge. I doubt it.
Anyway, after hearing Ben Shapiro briefly address this article in his "The New Democratic Agenda" episode (about the 23 minute point), I thought it was time to tackle their tactics once again.
The article title is: "You Can't Define Away My Existence". Which I find interesting just as Ben did since the left has defined away the existence of millions of babies. The Subtitle was "The administration seems to think transgender people like me are as imaginary as hippogriffs".
The article starts off with this silly statement:
"I was surprised to learn on Sunday morning that I do not exist."
Now, no one anywhere had said that he did not exist, including the President about whom his article was directed. But this is the kind of rhetoric homosexuals depend on to milk the sympathy of an unsuspecting public. Rather than Mr. Boylan tell the public that he was trying to stop the possible resending of laws that protect their false reality, he crys "they are saying we don't exist!".
Here is an excerpt of what the New York Times reported on Oct. 21, 2018 in an article by Erica L. Green, Katie Benner and Robert Pear, (probably activists for homosexuals):
"Now the Department of Health and Human Services is spearheading an effort to establish a legal definition of sex under Title IX, the federal civil rights law that bans gender discrimination in education programs that receive government financial assistance, according to a memo obtained by The New York Times.
The department argued in its memo that key government agencies needed to adopt an explicit and uniform definition of gender as determined "on a biological basis that is clear, grounded in science, objective and administrable." The agency's proposed definition would define sex as either male or female, unchangeable, and determined by the genitals that a person is born with, according to a draft reviewed by The Times. Any dispute about one's sex would have to be clarified using genetic testing."
This is rational and necessary because of the way that homosexuals and others are changing the meaning of words to accommodate their mental disorder and to be able to in force laws without confusion or allowing laws to be misapplied because of obscurity of word meanings. It is only trying to hold to what we have always known about the difference between men and women. There is nothing in the plan to claim that people who claim they are transgender do not exist. That is the spin the homosexuals use to make them seem more like victims. They are really trying to bully us into keeping in place the unfair and irrational protections for people who claim to be transgender that Obama put in place, and they are using word play and misinformation to do it.
Note this statement in the Times article:
"The new definition would essentially eradicate federal recognition of the estimated 1.4 million Americans who have opted to recognize themselves - surgically or otherwise - as a gender other than the one they were born into."
This is where the sound bite "define out of existence" comes from, and it is a spin to inflame protest. What it does not say is that the current administration is trying to clean up the confusion started by the previous administration, by their changing the normal meaning and understanding of male and female, to accommodate people who want to claim that they are their opposite sex or no sex at all. Claims that are foolish and that were never allowed before homosexuals took over major psychological institutions and started making up new positive identifications for mental disorders.
When anyone expresses a difference of opinion to their homosexual claims, they must misrepresent that difference of opinion to such an exaggerated extent as to make the one differing with them, seem like they are the one who is talking crazy. This is strange considering how often homosexuals complained about being misrepresented. But then, their platform has always been a double standard. "We can be dishonest, rude, crafty and spiteful towards others, but no one will get away with being such to us.
Mr. Boylan then proceeded to play their usual and quite effective, "loving family" tactic. He says:
"This will come as sad news to my children, to whom I've been a mother for over 20 years now."
No, you have been a father who acts like a female to them. The reality is that a father can never truly be a mother to their child.
"It will come as a shock to my wife, too, to whom I've been married for 30 years.
It would have been a disappointment for my mother, as well - the conservative, evangelical Christian Republican, who, when she learned I was transgender, two decades ago, said, "I would never turn my back on my child," and then quoted First Corinthians: "These three remain: faith, hope, and love; but the greatest of these is love."
Now, this kind of tactic can only be effective on a person who refused to think critically, and simply operated by their emotions. Unfortunately, there are a lot of people who operate this way these days.
But a critical thinker, in addition to catching the above mentioned misrepresentation, would have noticed how Mr. Boylan feels free to use his family to weave his deception. They would also notice the confusion of him being a man, acting like a woman, and then thinking that he has a "wife". It does not matter to him that he cannot act and function like a woman and logically claim another female as his "wife". You see, reality must take a back seat to his fantasy. Redefining words to suit their depravity is a necessary tactic to make them feel normal.
Additionally a thinking person would go to the Bible to check and see if his "Evangelical" mother applied the scripture that he claims she quoted to him correctly.
1 Corinthians 13 is where the verse is found, at the end of the chapter, but in verse 5 Paul also says that love "Doth not behave itself unseemly". Given that God in the Bible is clear about the roles of men and women, and their created differences, only a deceived soul would fail to recognize that a man claiming to be and acting like a woman would be acting unseemly in direct opposition to what said in that same chapter.
Verse 5 also says that love "thinks no evil". For anyone to disrespect God's created order and to think it is acceptable to God, that is to think evil. (Romans 1:18-32, 2:4-11).
In verse 6 Paul says that love "does not rejoice in iniquity, but rejoices in the truth", which means that true biblical love cannot be happy supporting or taking part in iniquity, that is any kind of rebellion against God or His revealed truth in His rightly divided word.
So, if indeed his mother responded as he says she did, while she was right to love her child and not cast him out, she was wrong in not informing him of his transgression against God and His word, (Romans 1:18-32), and for not giving him verse 5 and 6 of 1 Corinthians 13.
But then, many people who claim to be Christians put their family and friends before God's truth and attempt to justify it by twisting God's word to fit their sin.
"It has been a hard life for me, these last 60 years, but on the whole I have felt grateful for the many blessings that have come my way, and being trans not least."
So he says he has had a hard life, but accepting no accountability for his actions that contributed too much of the hardness. This is another con, they generally refuse to acknowledge the role that their choices, decisions and actions played in their hardships, preferring to point the finger at others and blame them for whatever pain they suffer. For the lack of acceptance that they think all are responsible for having for those who refuse to acknowledge their biological sex and choose to opt for claiming to be a sex that they were not. They even blame us for their choices to commit suicide and seek to force us to feel guilt about it so that we will back off of our convictions about homosexuality and allow them to feel normal via our acceptance. Mr. Boylan will try this later in his article.
It is a sad but effective tactic that works on too many people who have not been sufficiently informed, and who refuse to think critically and logically.
Yet he feels that his being trans is a "blessing". Only in a non-reality, created by those in rebellion against God can such a life be described as blessed.
He then continues with his misrepresentation of what he claims the Trump Administration was doing:
"It is so disappointing, then, and more than a little embarrassing, to learn I'm imaginary - a creature no more real than the cyclops, or a hippogriff."
No, what is imaginary is your accusation against the Trump administration and your ideas about gender and what determines a person's biological sex.
Again, no one to my knowledge as made any claim that he as a trans-man does not exist. There had been no announcements by the Trump administration that trans-men and women do not exist. But this is the irrational condition of such people's minds, they must force us to accept their delusion or they will accuse us of not recognizing their existence. You see, that sounds so much worst when they claim that someone is denying their existence, than if they just say that they claim that a man cannot be a woman nor can a woman be a man. This is the kind of word games they must play because they know that they have no rational or logical foundation upon which to stand. What is sad is that they know that people will fall for their spin on the facts, and become offended right along with them without thinking critically about how foolish the complaint is.
Mr. Boylan continues:
"On Sunday, news broke that the Trump administration seeks to narrowly define gender as an immutable condition determined by genitalia at birth."
No, they seek to accurately define the sexes that way, you have chosen to conflate the Sex of people with a new made up "gender flexibility" terminology. So your claim that:
"About 1.4 million Americans who identify as transgender would find that identity eradicated by the federal government." is a bold face lie.
"the state of being male or female (typically used with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones)."
So while gender generally refers to the social and cultural differences between men and women, SEX refers to the biological difference. But both define the difference between men and women. That is the norm that homosexuals and other liberal leftists are trying to destroy.
Mr. Boylan continues:
"I admit that I'm reluctant to react to this latest cruelty, which is obviously just one more cynical move clearly designed to stir the pot ahead of the election."
Notice how out of touch with reality he is, he refers to an attempt to enforce an accurate depiction of the sexes as "cruelty". And he complains that it is a move to get votes, as if his article is not written for the same reason, to rally homosexuals and their supporters to vote out all conservatives who refuse to bow to illogic.
"Trans people are the latest conservative whipping girl, like African-Americans in the 1950s, or gay people in the 1990s and 2000s. Nothing is more dependable now than the passion the heartless display when trans people's humanity is offered up for mockery."
It is amazing how uninterested he is in being honest. And how unconcerned he is about offending thinking African-Americans by daring to compare his personality disorder with our ethnicity. Even his use of "gay people" which by the way he is one of, is faulty as comparison to his complaint about a move to accurately define the sexes. The effort by the administration is to call what always was, what it still is, a man is a man and a woman is a woman.
Homosexuals have every right to claim that they prefer to have sex with their same gender; they were not rejected simply because they prefer their same gender, but they were rejected when they attempted to force that perversion on others, and flaunted in the public. Thinking people knew what they were after, and that they would not stop at "acceptance".
Notice how he then throws together another mix of unrelated things to give the illusion that he is on the side of truth and is being rational when in fact he is expressing an illogical point:
"I was speaking at the F. Scott Fitzgerald Festival in Rockville, Md., this weekend, when I first read about the administration's intentions. Since then, I've thought a lot about Nick Carraway, in "The Great Gatsby," who yearns for a world "in uniform and at a sort of moral attention forever."
Who would not want to live in such a world - a place in which things are ordered and simple, a world in which you never have to make room for people whose experience of being human is so radically different from your own? Conservatives, in particular, seem to yearn for such a place.
But then, that would surely be a world in which everyone would be nearly the same - drab and soulless, like Trump Tower."
Notice again the misrepresentation of us conservatives, because we acknowledge that there are biological differences that make a man a man and a woman a woman, we MUST yearn for a world of the simple and ordered with no room for variation. Can you see the massive jump from reality to illogic? But then as I said, that is necessary for them, because their arguments are not strong enough or rational enough to stand on their own.
He continues with this irrational line of argument:
"Instead, the actual world contains all sorts of wonderful variations of nature. Look: There are toucans and puffins! There is the duck-billed platypus and the blue lobster! The Venus fly-trap! Isn't it a miracle that God has given us all these wonderful things?
Surely, if there is room in this world for these, there should be room in this world for me."
Do you see how they must shift the focus from actual issue to a non-issue, and make the non-issue the issue? This issue has nothing to do with the diversity that is in the world which no one denies or objects to. The issue is protecting our language for being distorted by those who seek to use it justify and normalize their mental disorder as if it was something good, normal and beneficial to society.
Mr. Boylan, it is also wonderful that God has also given us His judgment about what a male and female is. (Gen. 1:27, Matt. 19:4, Deut. 22:5, Rom. 1:18-32). And nowhere in His word does He accept that a man can be a woman or a woman a man.
"Up until now, there has been, and more of it in recent years, as government and culture have become a little more accepting. But now that America is great again, people like me are to be redefined out of existence."
You see, he is mixing the diversity of life in nature, (that all acknowledge and accept as wonderful), with the idea that there are legitimate differences within the very nature of humans that transcends, (pun intended) and even disannuls the very identity of their sex. These two ideas are not together, nor do they belong together. The latter is a fabrication of the mental disordered (and those who support them), who have infiltrated our society as normal people and have injected their twisted thinking into our cultures via Hollywood, the liberal-left TV and cable and satellite networks, our education system and our government. They have come out of the closet with the help of sex exploiter and pervert Hugh Hefner, homosexual Alfred Kinsey, Charles Darwin and others. But you will not hear this stated on any of your favorite liberal-left news outlets or TV networks. In fact, such critical thinking is outlawed by those sources. So you had better find more reliable sources to get your knowledge from.
Mr. Boylan continues:
"President Trump and company should be prepared for the consequences of this decision -because the people most likely to be disappointed in this Glum New World will be themselves.
They will be disappointed to find themselves - if they are men - standing in a men's room with me. Even though I have breasts and a vagina and a clitoris (and I do thank you for asking), in the new world that they're creating I'll be right there in the boy's room with them, checking my bra straps and putting on eyeliner - you know, because of the Y chromosome that they insist is the only gender marker that matters.
Don't like this world? Well, you could have left us alone."
It is hard for anyone who is a thinking person to miss this taunt, this in your face attitude and utter disrespect for anyone who does not simply love this kind of "diversity". This attitude will one day result in the tyrannical control of homosexuals over straights in our nation, if we who love God continue to allow them to redefine words like gender, love, respect, tolerance, bigotry, male, female and homophobia.
A thinking person would ask themselves, why would a major respected newspaper allow the publishing of this kind of article, and the answer would be, because perhaps there are many homosexuals of all kinds working there in high places, and this is their agenda, to get the word out.
Boylan continues with his con use of manipulation tactics:
"Republican parents of transgender children will now find their trans sons and daughters endangered by freshly empowered bullies. How will those parents react when their vulnerable, frightened children come home in tears - or bruised, or not at all? Will these children make the choice of Leelah Alcorn, who decided that rather than live in such a world, she would throw herself beneath the wheels of a truck?
Don't like this world? Well, you could have left us alone."
This is the common guilt trip tactic that only thinking people can get past. You see, by our not twisting the meaning of words like gender and male and female to suit homosexuals, we are somehow empowering bullies, (unstable people who express their disagreements with physical force). We are the ones behind their desire to bully homosexuals because we give them the right to hurt homosexuals by our not agreeing with homosexuals and supporting their agenda to redefine reality. It is not just the fault of the unstable bully, they are not accountable for their acts of violence alone, but we must share their guilt because we dare to disagree with the homosexual agenda. This kind of thinking is not only foolish, it is devious. And it must be seen for what it is.
His sick use of the unfortunate suicide of Josh Alcorn, to make us feel guilty as if our correct view of homosexuality caused Josh to kill himself, is pathetic and should be called what it is. Dr. James White covers the Josh Alcon issue from a biblical perspective for those interested.
It seems that homosexuals are in denial about their own mental instability and they must blame others for their condition so that they won't have to deal with self-accountability.
Mr. Boylan continues:
"I have news for Donald Trump. I do exist. Trans men and women exist. Genderqueer people exist. We have been part of this country for hundreds of years - since before the Revolution, in fact. Redefining us won't make us go away. It won't restore your world to its precious, boring binary - which, I hate to tell you, never existed in the first place.
All it will do is make people suffer."
Again, he is arguing about something that has not been attempted. This is a scam to get people who think with their emotions and not with their head to "feel" like these homosexuals are being denied their existence. As I said, that goes over much more effectively than the truth. And such people are not interested in the truth when it comes to their homosexuality, they are only interested in manipulating the public to think like they do about the matter.
But to give the impression that homosexuals have always been around is deceptive.
God did not create men thinking they were women nor women thinking that they were men. He made both distinct and with a knowledge of who they were and how they complimented each other. Yes they were around before and during the revolution, and they were view correctly back then, as violators of God's created order. But naturally Mr. Boylan would not want to bring that up because it would not help his agenda.
Homosexuality in all of its forms is an expression of the sin within humanity, an act of rebellion against God and His created order. And nothing we do can sanitize homosexuality to be something good. Only by telling this truth can we truly be acting in love towards those who are trapped in the homosexual confusion (either by choice or by force).
Mr. Boylan concludes:
"Can any good come out of this miserable moment? Well, I can hope that this will inspire people, more than ever, to fight back - not just trans people - but our spouses, and our children, and our allies, too. Their numbers will include people not unlike my late mother - conservative Republican women who just can't stand to see their children bullied by the one person in the country who ought to be most concerned with keeping us all safe.
Don't like this world? Mr. Trump, you could have left us alone."
So finally, in the midst of all the reverse trigger words, "miserable moment", "our allies", "conservative Republican women", "bullied", and "safe", he admits that this article has a political agenda, to get people to "fight back" but he forgot to say "at the ballot box" or the equivalent. That is what this is really all about.
So I hope I have sufficiently spoiled his agenda, at least in the minds of those who have read this and honestly want to make a difference.
True Christians and even non-Christians who have determined to hold on the their sanity, must not be bullied or manipulated by the liberal left media or homosexual activists who seem to think that they are the only ones whose view of human nature matter.
While we acknowledge that you are here Mr. Boylan, we are not obligated to endure your attempts at misinforming us about what the Trump administration actually is trying to do. Nor are we obligated to allow you to redefine what reality is or how we should view your mental disorder. You are here, you do exist, and you are mentally disturbed and need help.
If you don't like the fact that we have a right to tell the truth……
then you should have left US alone.